Telemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.

Emergency physicians and nurses were trained in telemedicine techniques in two emergency departments, one rural (low volume) and one suburban (high volume). Fifteen patient complaints were selected as appropriate for the study. Of 122 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 104 (85%) consented to participate. They were randomized to control and experimental groups. The suburban emergency physician diagnosed and treated the control patients. Experimental patients presenting to the high-volume emergency department were evaluated and treated by the telemedicine nurse in person and the rural emergency physician via the telemedicine link. Immediately before discharge all telemedicine patients were re-evaluated by the suburban emergency physician. Data collected on each patient included: diagnosis; treatment; 72 h return visits; need for additional care; and satisfaction of patient, physicians and nurses. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) for occurrence of 72 h return visits, need for additional care or overall patient satisfaction. The average patient throughput time (from admission to discharge) was 106 min for the telemedicine group and 117 min for the control group. Telemedicine was a satisfactory technique for the chosen group of patients in the emergency department and was acceptable to the participants.

A randomized controlled trial of telemedicine in an emergency department.

A prospective study of emergency department telemedicine was carried out at two hospitals in northern New Jersey. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and four (85%) consented to participate, with 54 being randomized to the telemedicine group and 50 to the control group. Four patients did not complete the protocol. No significant differences were seen between the groups for: occurrence of 72 h emergency department return visits (0% vs 0%); need for additional care (2.3% vs 2.4%); positive patient-physician interaction (98% vs 100%); positive patient-nurse interaction (98% vs 98%); positive overall patient satisfaction (98% vs 95%). The average patient throughput time (time from admission to discharge) for the telemedicine group was 106 min; the average for the control group was 117 min. Telemedicine was found to be a satisfactory technique for pre-selected emergency department patients and was viewed by the physicians as an acceptable method of complementary care.

A comparison of oral, rectal, and tympanic membrane-derived temperature changes after ingestion of liquids and smoking.

Ambulatory patients frequently ingest liquids or smoke just before temperature measurement. The change in body temperature measurements over time following ingestion of ice water, hot water, and smoking were investigated. Twenty-two healthy, afebrile study subjects sequentially ingested temperature-controlled water and smoked a cigarette. Simultaneous oral and auditory canal temperatures were measured over 15 minutes following ingestion. Auditory canal temperatures were obtained with an infrared detection probe; we designated this process a tympanic membrane-derived (TMD) temperature. To determine the correlation between rectal and TMD temperatures, 100 patients had simultaneous measurements at both sites. Mean initial temperatures were rectal, 37.1 +/- 0.5 degrees C (mean +/- S.D.); oral, 36.4 +/- 0.4 degrees C; and TMD, 37.4 +/- 0.4 degrees C. Maximal mean oral temperature change was greatest at 1.5 minutes after hot, +0.9 +/- 0.1 degrees C, and cold, -1.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C, water. This change was statistically significant for seven minutes at the 95% confidence level (analysis of variance test with Dunnett's multiple range test for significance). There was no significant change in the TMD temperature with any ingestion. The Pearson correlation coefficient for 107 pairs of rectal and TMD temperatures, r = 0.90 (P less than .001), was excellent. It was concluded that hot and cold liquids significantly influence oral temperature measurement for seven to nine minutes following ingestion. TMD temperature is unaffected by liquid ingestion and may allow accurate measurement of body temperature. Further studies are needed to determine the accuracy of TMD temperature over a wide range of body temperature in diverse clinical settings.