The Pillow Project, Infant Choking, and Basic Life Support Training for Prospective Parents: A Low-Cost Intervention for Widespread Application.

Dissemination of pediatric basic life support skills, while recommended, is not done routinely for pregnant women and their partners within the maternity services. This study evaluates an e-learning program coupled with the use of a novel infant pillow mannequin to determine whether a low-cost intervention with potential for widespread application could enable training in the event of an infant choking and the provision of basic life support. A prospective cohort study with an uncontrolled pre- and posttest design was used following institutional ethical approval. A 4-week cycle of antenatal education classes in a regional Maternity Hospital in Ireland and a purposive sample of pregnant women and their partners attending the antenatal education classes were used. The following measures were assessed: (1) confidence in knowing what to do in the event of an infant choking; (2) confidence in performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (3) ability to perform the requisite skills; and (4) the perceived acceptability of the infant pillow mannequin as a means of practice. Twenty-four individuals completed a pre- and postprogram questionnaire. The e-learning program along with practice on the pillow mannequin significantly affected confidence (P < .001) in the actions to take in the event of an infant choking and in performing infant CPR. Forty-four participants used the pillow mannequin for practice and volunteered to have their skills assessed. More than 90% demonstrated correct positioning of the infant in the event of choking, correctly identified the correct ratio of chest compressions to breaths, and conducted chest compressions to the required depth. Three distinct categories of comment were identified: usefulness of the program; simplicity of the program/pillow mannequin; and accessibility for practice at home. A self-instructional e-learning program coupled with an infant pillow mannequin enables parents to learn the procedure in the event of an infant choking and to demonstrate basic life support. This low-cost intervention has the potential for widespread application within developed and developing countries.

Exploring geographical variation in access to general surgery in Ireland: Evidence from a national study.

BACKGROUND: Improving the equity of surgical services is an important objective of all clinical programmes both local and overseas. Variations in access to care threaten to dismantle the structural paradigm of any health service and such information can aid in promoting quality and access to surgical services. The aim of this study was to explore the geographical variation in the utilisation of common general surgical procedures in Ireland as a measure of the population's access to surgical interventions. METHODS: Age- and gender-standardized rates for 6 common general surgical procedures were calculated for 28 geographic areas (counties) in the Republic of Ireland using data from the national Hospital Inpatient Enquiry System. Standard statistical indicators (systematic component of variation, coefficient of variation and extremal quotient) were used to measure the extent of regional variation. RESULTS: A total of 998,406 episodes of hospital care were included in the analysis. Large variation in utilisation was present between the studied counties; CV > 0.3 (range 19.4-31.2), SCV > 5 (range 5.2-14.6). Most procedures were utilised at substantially higher rates outside the larger cities (Dublin, Galway, Waterford). CONCLUSION: Variations stemming from inefficient and unequal access are important components and markers of modern health systems and should be minimal. County of residence appears to have a clear influence on a patients' inaccessibility to certain interventions. Our findings imply a need for improved access at a regional level by facilitating the integration of public policies and promoting services at the appropriate settings.

Elective ambulatory surgical care in Ireland-why it needs to be better coded, classified and managed.

BACKGROUND: In the year to July 2017, surgical disciplines accounted for 73% of the total national inpatient and day case waiting list and, of these, day cases accounted for 72%. Their proper classification is therefore important so that patients can be managed and treated in the most suitable and efficient setting. AIMS: We set out to sub-classify the different elective surgical day cases treated in Irish public hospitals in order to assess their need to be managed as day cases and the consistency of practice between hospitals. METHODS: We analysed all elective day cases that came under the care of surgeons between January 2014 and December 2016 and sub-classified them into those that were (A) true day case surgical procedures; (B) minor surgery or outpatient procedures; (C) gastrointestinal endoscopies; (D) day case, non-surgical interventions and (E) unclassified or having no primary procedure identified. RESULTS: Of 813,236 day case surgical interventions performed over 3 years, 26% were adjudged to accord with group A, 41% with B, 23% with C, 5% with D and 5% with E. The ratio of A to B procedures did not vary significantly across the range of hospital types. However, there were some notable variations in coding and practices between hospitals. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that many day cases should have been performed as outpatient procedures and that there were variations in coding and practices between hospitals that could not be easily explained. Outpatient procedure coding and a better, more consistent, classification of day cases are both required to better manage this group of patients.

Characteristics of patients who are acutely admitted to hospital under surgical care and do not have a surgical procedure - Is there an alternative to admission?

INTRODUCTION: Previous work has shown that 56% of all acute surgical admissions in Ireland in 2012 did not have a formal surgical procedure. In light of the pressures on health systems internationally and the lack of relevant data on this topic in the literature, we examined the characteristics of this cohort of patients in Ireland. METHODS: Discharge data on acutely admitted patients who did not undergo a surgical procedure was extracted from the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) database for the year 2013. These were analysed by age, sex, diagnoses, procedures performed and length of stay in hospital. RESULTS: In 2013, 63,079 patients were admitted acutely under surgical care and then discharged without undergoing a formal surgical procedure compared to 49,903 who had a surgical procedure. Most of the discharges not having formal surgery were treated by general surgical specialities (n = 41,434) and the average length of stay was 4.8 days. Approximately half of these patients (n = 32,194) did not have any HIPE coded procedure, surgical or otherwise, during their admission into hospital. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients were admitted to Irish surgical units in 2013 and were discharged again without any formal surgical intervention. We postulate that some of these patients may not require admission to hospital and outline mechanisms which may prevent admissions Such mechanisms could allow for greater capacity for scheduled patients in currently overstrained surgical units.

Research in progress: Medical Research Council United Kingdom Refractory Asthma Stratification Programme (RASP-UK).

The UK Refractory Asthma Stratification Programme (RASP-UK) will explore novel biomarker stratification strategies in severe asthma to improve clinical management and accelerate development of new therapies. Prior asthma mechanistic studies have not stratified on inflammatory phenotype and the understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in asthma without Type 2 cytokine inflammation is limited. RASP-UK will objectively assess adherence to corticosteroids (CS) and examine a novel composite biomarker strategy to optimise CS dose; this will also address what proportion of patients with severe asthma have persistent symptoms without eosinophilic airways inflammation after progressive CS withdrawal. There will be interactive partnership with the pharmaceutical industry to facilitate access to stratified populations for novel therapeutic studies.

A method to assess adherence in inhaler use through analysis of acoustic recordings of inhaler events.

RATIONALE: Poor adherence to inhaler use can be due to poor temporal and/or technique adherence. Up until now there has been no way of reliably tracking both these factors in everyday inhaler use. OBJECTIVES: This paper introduces a device developed to create time stamped acoustic recordings of an individual's inhaler use, in which empirical evidence of temporal and technique adherence in inhaler use can be monitored over time. The correlation between clinical outcomes and adherence, as determined by this device, was compared for temporal adherence alone and combined temporal and technique adherence. FINDINGS: The technology was validated by showing that the doses taken matched the number of audio recordings (r2 = 0.94, p<0.01). To demonstrate that audio analysis of inhaler use gives objective information, in vitro studies were performed. These showed that acoustic profiles of inhalations correlated with the peak inspiratory flow rate (r2 = 0.97, p<0.01), and that the acoustic energy of exhalations into the inhaler was related to the amount of drug removed. Despite training, 16% of participants exhaled into the mouthpiece after priming, in >20% of their inhaler events. Repeated training reduced this to 7% of participants (p = 0.03). When time of use was considered, there was no evidence of a relationship between adherence and changes in AQLQ (r2 = 0.2) or PEFR (r2 = 0.2). Combining time and technique the rate of adherence was related to changes in AQLQ (r2 = 0.53, p = 0.01) and PEFR (r2 = 0.29, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel method to objectively assess how errors in both time and technique of inhaler use impact on clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2011-004149-42.

Early outcomes for rectal cancer surgery in the republic of ireland following a national centralization program.

BACKGROUND: Following a national audit of rectal cancer management in 2007, a national centralization program in the Republic of Ireland was initiated. In 2010, a prospective evaluation of rectal cancer treatment and early outcomes was conducted. METHODS: A total of 29 colorectal surgeons in 14 centers prospectively collated data on all patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery in 2010. RESULTS: Data were available on 447 patients who underwent proctectomy with curative intent for rectal cancer in 2010; 23.7 % of patients underwent abdominoperineal excision. The median number of lymph nodes identified was 12. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.1 %. Compared with 2007, there was a reduction in positive circumferential margin rate (15.8 vs 4.5 %, P < 0.001), clinical anastomotic leak rate (10.8 vs 4.3 %, P = 0.002), and postoperative radiotherapy use (17.8 vs 4.0 %, P < 0.001). Also, 53.9 % received preoperative radiotherapy in 2010. Four centers gave statistically more patients (high-administration), and four centers gave fewer patients (low-administration) preoperative radiotherapy for T2/T3 tumors (P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, being treated in a "high-administration center" increased the likelihood (likelihood ratio [LR], 2.9; 95 % CI 1.7-4.8; P < 0.001) while attending a "low-administration center" (LR, 0.3; 95 % CI 0.2-0.5; P < 0.001) reduced the likelihood of receiving preoperative radiotherapy for a T2/T3 rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in hospitals following a national centralization initiative received high-quality surgery. Significant heterogeneity exists in radiotherapy administration, and evidence-based guidelines should be developed and implemented.

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases.

INTRODUCTION: For colorectal surgeons, laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery poses a new challenge. The defence of the questionable oncological safety tempered by the impracticality of the long learning curve is rapidly fading. As a unit specialising in minimally invasive surgery, we have routinely undertaken rectal cancer surgery laparoscopically since 2005. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer between June 2005 and February 2010 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer during the study period. One hundred and twenty patients had a laparoscopic resection, six were converted to open (conversion rate 5%) and 10 had a planned primary open procedure. Fifty four were low rectal tumours and 76 were upper rectal tumours. One hundred and thirteen patients had an anterior resection (87%), 17 patients an abdomino-perineal resection (13%) and 62 of the 130 patients (47.6%) had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median lymph node retrieval rate was 12 (9-14), five patients (3.8%) had a positive circumferential margin and the clinical anastomotic leak rate was 3.8% (n = 5 patients). There was no significant difference in the stated parameters for neoadjuvant versus non-neoadjuvant patients and for upper versus lower rectal tumours. Ninety three percent of mesorectal excision specimens were complete on pathological assessment. CONCLUSIONS: During the study period, 92% of rectal cancers underwent a laparoscopic resection with low rates of morbidity and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. This data supports the view that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be safely delivered in mid-volume centres by surgeons who have completed the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer: evaluation of oncological efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic resection of low rectal cancer poses significant technical difficulties for the surgeon. There is a lack of published follow-up data in relation to the surgical, oncological and survival outcomes in these patients. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical, oncological and survival outcomes in all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancers were included in the study. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were recorded over a 4-year period. The mean follow-up was 25 months RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included in the study, 30 of whom were males. The mean age was 64.14 years (range, 34-86 years). The mean hospital stay was 8.2 days (range, 4-42 days). Fifty were completed laparoscopically and three were converted to an open procedure. Thirty-eight were anterior resections and 15 were abdominoperineal resections. Twenty-four patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The total mesorectal excision was optimal in 51 (98%) cases. There were no anastomotic sequelae and no surgical mortality. There was no local recurrence detected. The overall survival (mean follow-up, 25 months) was 93.5%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancers permits optimum oncological control. In our series, this technical approach is associated with excellent 4-year survival and clinical outcomes.

Complex rectal polyps: other treatment modalities required when offering a transanal endoscopic microsurgery service.

PURPOSE: Complex rectal polyps may present a clinical challenge. The study aim was to assess different treatment modalities required in the management of patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. METHODS: Patients referred with complex rectal polyps from 1998 to 2008 were entered prospectively to a colorectal database. These data was analyzed for referral pattern, histology, surgical procedures performed, and subsequent outcome. RESULTS: Of the 209 patients referred (101 female, 108 male, median age of 65 years, range of 24-89), 132 (63%) were deemed suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Seventeen patients required a second staged procedure; three patients required an anterior resection at time of index surgery. Seventeen patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery went direct to anterior resection, 37 underwent snare polypectomy (SP), and 17 patients underwent transanal excision. Six patients had no surgery (three unfit for anesthesia and three had no residual lesions). Thus, 37% of the patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery required a different treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of patients referred to our unit with complex rectal polyps were suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. However, this study highlights that in offering a transanal microsurgery service, one should be prepared for a diversity of pathology necessitating a range of management options.

Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic resection for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven to have a similar oncological efficacy compared to open resection. Despite this, it is performed by a minority of colorectal surgeons. The aim of our study was to evaluate the short-term clinical, oncological and survival outcomes in all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colon cancer. METHODS: From July 2005 to December 2008, 202 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic resection for colon cancer. Surgery was analysed on an intention to treat basis. The mean follow-up was 24.3 months. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients underwent resection for colon cancer. Two hundred two underwent laparoscopic resection (91%). One hundred sixteen were male patients. Mean age was 65.9 years (range = 24-91). The median length of stay was 6.6 days (mean = 7.1 days). One hundred eighty-eight of 202 (93.1%) were completed laparoscopically. Fourteen (6.9%) were converted. The overall morbidity rate was 15.8%. There were three clinically apparent anastomotic leaks. The 30-day mortality was 1 (0.5%). The mean nodal yield was 13.4 (range = 8-37) nodes. There were no positive margins detected. Overall survival in laparoscopically treated colon cancer was 88.1%. In those patients with non-metastatic disease, the overall survival was 90.7% (165/182). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer is achievable in 85% (188/222) of patients. This facilitates adequate oncological clearance. It is associated with a low morbidity rate and favourable short-term survival outcomes. This data reflects the potential outcomes dedicated MIS colorectal units will have to offer colon cancer patients once laparoscopic colorectal surgery becomes the de facto surgical approach.

The benefit of an enhanced recovery programme following elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) have demonstrated reduced morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open elective colorectal resections. The application of laparoscopic techniques to colorectal surgery is associated with shorter length of stay and morbidity compared to open resections. In the setting of laparoscopic surgery, it is unclear whether there is an additive effect on length of stay and morbidity by combining these. The current study addresses the benefit of an ERP (RAPID protocol) in a cohort of matched patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients over a 40-month period who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection were assigned either to the RAPID protocol (group 1) or traditional post operative care (group 2) in a non-randomised manner. Analysis was on an "intention to treat" basis. Primary and secondary endpoints were identified; primary endpoints included length of hospital stay and readmission rate. Secondary endpoints included morbidity and mortality rate. RESULTS: Seventy-three consecutive patients were included. Group 1 included 37 patients. Group 2 included 36 patients. Median length of hospital stay in groups 1 and 2 was 5 and 8 days, respectively (p = 0.01). Readmission rate in groups 1 and 2 was 8.1% and 8.3%, respectively (p = 0.98). Morbidity rate in groups 1 and 2 was 30% and 22%, respectively (p = 0.61); there was one mortality in each group. CONCLUSION: The application of the ERP (RAPID) to patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection results in a significant improvement in length of hospital stay, with comparable morbidity and readmission rates.

Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine whether the metrics from a left-sided laparoscopic colectomy (LC) simulator could distinguish between the objectively scored performance of minimally invasive colorectal expert and novice surgeons. We report our results from the first virtual reality-based laparoscopic colorectal training course for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. METHODS: Eleven surgeons, experienced but novice in LC, constituted the novice group, and three experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons (>300 LCs) served as our experts. Novice subjects received didactic educational sessions and instruction in practice of LC from the experts. All subjects received instruction, demonstration, and supervision on the surgical technique to perform a LC on the simulator. All subjects then performed a laparoscopic colectomy on the simulator. Experts performed the same case as the novices. Outcomes measured by the simulator were time to perform the procedure, instrument path length, and smoothness of the trajectory of the instruments. Anatomy trays from the simulator were objectively scored for explicitly predefined intraoperative errors after each procedure. RESULTS: Expert surgeons performed significantly better then the novice colorectal surgeons with regard to instrument path length, instrument smoothness, and time taken to complete the procedure. Of the 13 predetermined errors, experts made significantly fewer errors in total then the novices (mean score 2.67 versus 4.7, p=0.03), and performed better in 8 out of 13 errors. CONCLUSION: The parameters assessed by the ProMIS VR simulator for laparoscopic colorectal training distinguished between novice and expert colorectal surgeons, despite using otherwise experienced novices who had extensive training before the procedure and expert mentoring during it. Experts performed the simulated procedure significantly faster with more efficient use of their instruments, and made fewer intraoperative errors. Thus the simulator demonstrated construct validity.

Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in surgical training is unclear. Although LA as a therapeutic modality is potentially superior to open surgery, it has failed to become established as standard in training hospitals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of LA performed by inexperienced surgeons in a training environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all attempted LA performed over a 12-month period was undertaken. Data collected included operator grade (experienced and inexperienced), conversion rate and duration of surgery, complications, and postoperative stay. RESULTS: During the study period, 169 appendectomies were performed. The conversion rate to open surgery declined significantly from 28% in the first quarter to 9% in the last quarter, with no difference in the conversion rate between experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Operative time shortened significantly in the inexperienced group. Postoperative complications occurred in 8% of patients, independent of operative grade. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that LA may be safely introduced as a teaching procedure. Time-to-train should not preclude institutions from adopting the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

Electromyographic biofeedback can improve subjective and objective measures of fecal incontinence in the short term.

Electromyographic biofeedback therapy has demonstrated subjective improvement in patients with fecal incontinence that is comparable to surgery. We assessed the efficacy of biofeedback therapy in a consecutive heterogeneous group of patients using both subjective and objective assessment criteria. These 28 patients with fecal incontinence were studied retrospectively. Patients were assessed using a quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL), the Vaizey and Wexner incontinence scoring systems, and anorectal manometry for efficacy of treatment, before and after biofeedback therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients completed the study. Median follow-up was 18 months. Eighty percent of patients demonstrated significant improvements in their Vaizey and Wexner scores (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The mean QOL score improved from 62 to 77 (P<0.01). Significant improvements were also demonstrated in the mean resting pressure (P<0.01), peak amplitude of squeeze (P<0.01), and the duration of squeeze pressure (P<0.05). The deferred 15-minute evacuation time also significantly increased (P<0.001). This study reported significant short-term improvement in fecal incontinence with electromyographic biofeedback therapy using validated subjective and objective scoring systems. Similarly, this treatment also significantly improved anorectal manometric findings. Our data confirm the role of biofeedback therapy in the multimodality approach to patients with fecal incontinence.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with idiopathic combined fecal and urinary incontinence.

The etiologies of combined fecal and urinary incontinence may be interrelated but remain poorly understood. A potential variable in this process is global pelvic floor dysfunction. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the use of phased-array, body coil dynamic MRI in identifying pelvic floor abnormalities in patients with combined incontinence symptoms. Symptomatic patients were compared to asymptomatic control subjects and were selected from those referred to the pelvic physiology laboratory with complaints of combined urinary and fecal incontinence. All patients underwent standard urodynamic studies and anorectal physiologic assessment. Colonoscopy and endoanal ultrasonography were also performed. A standardized protocol was used for dynamic MRI, and the parameters were measured using workstation software (callipers, compass, and densitometer). In the incontinent group there was a significant difference, when compared to control subjects, in the angle of the levator ani muscle arch of the levator plate complex (3.0+/-5 degrees vs. 14+/-10 degrees; P=0.004), the width of the levator hiatus (58.3+/-8 mm vs. 46.5+/-8 mm; P=0.001), the area and tissue density of the levator ani muscle (19.5+/-1 mm(2) vs. 26.9+/-1 mm(2); P=0.001, and 157.3+/-47 pixels vs. 126.1+/-23 pixels; P=0.025, respectively), and in the length of the external anal sphincter (20.0+/-5 mm vs. 26.6+/-13 mm; P=0.03). Body coil dynamic MRI is a noninvasive and well-tolerated imaging modality. Our data show that it can identify changes in pelvic muscle morphology in patients with disorders of incontinence, and this may help in planning better management strategies.