Variability in rod to bone distance needed in pelvic subcutaneous internal fixation to avoid nerve compression: A tridimensional population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic internal fixation has become a popular method for treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Although successful, one complication is femoral nerve palsy from compression of the connecting rod. In light of this complication, this study was designed to evaluate sagittal inclinations of the rod and the feasibility of using a rod with a constant curvature. HYPOTHESIS: It is hypothesized that that there is a connection between the sagittal inclination of the rod and the rod to bone distance, as well as single rod can be contoured with a constant curvature to be used in the majority of all patients. METHODS: Three dimensional models of pelvis CTs from a single level 1 trauma center were created and imported into a program where software superimposed a pre-contoured rod in the sagittal planes upon the pelvic slices. The sagittal inclination was deemed acceptable is no interference occurred between the area of compression risk and the rod. For each pelvis and considered sagittal rod inclination, the rod radius of curvature (ROC), minimal rod to bone distance (RTB) and transverse inclinations (φL and φR) were measured at which the pedicle screws should be inserted to follow the direction of the smallest RTB. RESULTS: The sagittal inclinations feasible for all subjects were between 15° to 30°. In this sagittal range, the average RTB varied in values ranging from 4.0±0.9mm to 25.4±11.4mm (p<0.01). Only 46% of subjects allowed a rod with constant curvature. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study found that a rod to bone distance of 15mm was not safe for all models. As well, many subject models did not allow placement of pre-contoured rod. Patient specific templating of pelvic subcutaneous internal fixation is strictly needed to limit complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VII; Basic Science.

Adapting Orthopaedic Surgery Training Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Future Directions.

The COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world, altering the structure and existence of graduate medical education programs across all disciplines. Orthopaedic residency programs can adapt during these unprecedented times to continue providing meaningful education to trainees and to continue providing high-quality patient care, all while keeping both residents and patients safe from disease. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature and describe evidence-based changes that can be made in an orthopaedic residency program to ensure patient and resident safety while sustaining the principles of graduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe measures that can be enacted now or during future pandemics, including workforce and occupational modifications, personal protective equipment, telemedicine, online didactic education, resident wellness, return to elective surgery, and factors affecting medical students and fellows. After a review of these strategies, programs can make changes for sustainable improvements and adapt to be ready for second-wave events or future pandemics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.