Linezolid toxic optic neuropathy: A case report and review of visual prognosis.

Purpose: To describe a case of linezolid toxic optic neuropathy in a 71-year-old female and review the relevant literature. Observations: An adult female with progressive, symmetric vision loss was hypothesized to have linezolid toxic optic neuropathy. Following cessation of linezolid, the patient experienced improvement in visual function over two months. Conclusions and importance: Patients diagnosed with linezolid toxic optic neuropathy can expect some return of visual function after cessation. The degree of return does not correlate to the cumulative dose of the drug. The goal of this study was to summarize and add to the current body of literature on the topic.

Assessing the Variability of Antibiotic Management in Patients With Open Hand Fractures Presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: Open hand fractures may be difficult to recognize and treat. There is variability in management and administration of antibiotics for these types of injuries. Unlike open long bone fractures, there is no standardized protocol for antibiotic administration for open hand fractures in children. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of antibiotic management of open hand fractures in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review at a tertiary hospital in New York of patients with hand injuries between ages 0 and 18 years presenting to the emergency department during January 2019 and December 2020. Patient encounters were reviewed for open fractures of the hand. Descriptive statistics were included for demographic and physical characteristics. RESULTS: There were 80 encounters with open hand fractures, of which the most common being tuft fractures (77.5%). The mean age was 7.6 years (SD, 4.7 years) with male predominance (58.8%). Crush injuries were the most common mechanism of injury (78.8%). Bedside repair was performed on 62 encounters (77.5%), of which 45 (72.5%) required nail bed repair, 56 (90.3%) required suturing, and 24 (38.7%) required reduction. Antibiotics were given to 62 (77.5%) encounters, most commonly oral cefalexin (45.2%), oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (27.4%), and intravenous cefazolin (14.5%). Median time to antibiotics from emergency department registration to administration was 150 minutes (interquartile range, 92-216 minutes). Antibiotic prescriptions were sent for 71 encounters (88.8%). Seventy seven (96.3%) of the encounters were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric open hand fractures have a variability of type and timing to antibiotics. Future initiatives should attempt to create standardized guidelines for management of open hand fractures.

Association between Opioids Prescribed to Medical Inpatients with Pain and Long-Term Opioid Use.

OBJECTIVES: Opioid receipt during medical hospitalizations may be associated with subsequent long-term use. Studies, however, have not accounted for pain, which may explain chronic use. The objective of this study was to identify the association between opioid exposure during a medical hospitalization and use 6 to 12 months later. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study using electronic health record data from 10 hospitals in the Cleveland Clinic Health System in 2016. Eligible patients were opioid-naïve adults with pain age 18 years and older, admitted to a medical service. Outcomes were opioid receipt during hospitalization and on discharge, and long-term opioid use, defined as ≥2 prescriptions for at least 30 pills 6 to 12 months posthospitalization. We estimated the odds of long-term opioid use by opioid exposure during the hospitalization. Models controlled for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including patient-reported pain. RESULTS: Among the 2971 patients in the sample, 64% received opioids during their hospitalization and 28% were discharged with opioids. Overall, 3% of patients had long-term use. Higher pain score was associated with greater odds of long-term use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per point increase 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.19). No patient factors were associated with long-term use. Receipt of an opioid during a hospitalization only was not associated with long-term use (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 0.81-2.57), but receipt at discharge was (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 1.08-3.56). CONCLUSIONS: Although opioid receipt at discharge was associated with long-term use, the number of patients this applied to was small. Pain severity was an important predictor of long-term use and should be accounted for in future studies.

Association Between Pain, Blood Pressure, and Medication Intensification in Primary Care: an Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Treating hypertension is important but physicians often do not intensify blood pressure (BP) treatment in the setting of pain. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether reporting pain is associated with (1) elevated BP at the same visit, (2) medication intensification, and (3) elevated BP at the subsequent visit. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort SETTING: Integrated health system PARTICIPANTS: Adults seen in primary care EXPOSURE: Pain status based on numerical scale: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (≥ 7). MAIN MEASURES: We defined elevated BP as ≥ 140/80 mmHg and medication intensification as increasing the dose or adding a new antihypertensive medication. Multilevel regression models were used to find the association between pain and (1) elevated BP at the index visit; (2) medication intensification at the index visit; and (3) elevated BP at the subsequent visit. Models adjusted for demographics, chronic conditions, and clustering within physician. In the third model, we adjusted for initial systolic BP as well. KEY RESULTS: Our population included 56,322 patients; 3155 (6%) reported mild pain, 5050 (9%) reported moderate pain, and 4647 (8%) reported severe pain at the index visit. Compared with no pain, the adjusted odds ratios of elevated BP were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28-1.48) for severe pain, 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99-1.14) for moderate pain, and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.93-1.12) for mild pain. Adjusted odds ratios of medication intensification at the index visit were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54-0.80) for mild pain, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.52-0.72) for moderate pain, and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.47-0.64) for severe pain. Among patients with elevated BP at the index visit, reporting pain at the index visit was not associated with elevated BP at the subsequent visit. CONCLUSIONS: When patients reported pain, physicians were less likely to intensify antihypertensive treatment; nevertheless, patients reporting pain were not more likely to have elevated BP at the subsequent visit.

Suppressive myeloid cells are expanded by biliary tract cancer-derived cytokines in vitro and associate with aggressive disease.

BACKGROUND: BTC is an aggressive disease exacerbated by inflammation and immune suppression. Expansion of immunosuppressive cells occurs in biliary tract cancer (BTC), yet the role of BTC-derived cytokines in this process is unclear. METHODS: Activated signalling pathways and cytokine production were evaluated in a panel of human BTC cell lines. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cultured with BTC supernatants, with and without cytokine neutralising antibodies, and analysed by flow cytometry or immunoblot. A human BTC tissue microarray (TMA, n = 69) was stained for IL-6, GM-CSF, and CD33+S100a9+ cells and correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Immunomodulatory factors (IL-6, GM-CSF, MCP-1) were present in BTC supernatants. BTC supernatants expanded CD33dimCD11b+HLA-DRlow/- myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) from human PBMCs. Neutralisation of IL-6 and GM-CSF in BTC supernatants inhibited activation of STAT3/5, respectively, in PBMCs, with heterogeneous effects on MDSC expansion in vitro. Staining of a BTC TMA revealed a positive correlation between IL-6 and GM-CSF, with each cytokine and more CD33+S100a9+ cells. Increased CD33+S100a9+ staining positively correlated with higher tumour grade, differentiation and the presence of satellite lesions. CONCLUSION: BTC-derived factors promote suppressive myeloid cell expansion, and higher numbers of CD33+S100a9+ cells in resectable BTC tumours correlates with more aggressive disease.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve the Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Timely administration of corticosteroids improves asthma care in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Using the Model for Improvement, we aimed to decrease time to delivery of corticosteroids in patients presenting to the ED with an acute asthma exacerbation. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) project targeting ED patients 1-18 years of age with an acute asthma exacerbation. We collected 5 months of baseline data from the arrival time of an ED patient with an asthma exacerbation with a Modified Pulmonary Index Score ≥5 to the time of administration of corticosteroids. A quality improvement project was launched in October 2017 involving multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act ramps. Improvement interventions continued for 9 months through June 2018, including reeducation of residents and nurses in the ED asthma order set and nursing treatment protocols, respectively, and changes to the electronic health record. Data were tacked for 15 additional months until September 2019. To promote the use of the nursing treatment protocol, we utilized real-time improvement feedback and continuing nursing education. RESULTS: The mean percentage of patients receiving steroids within 60 minutes of arrival improved from 59.3% to 84.3% over the first 5 months. The mean time to the administration of steroids within 60 minutes of arrival improved from 71.4 to 48.1 minutes. There was no increase in ED return rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our project improved the percentage of patients with acute asthma exacerbations receiving steroids within 60 minutes of ED arrival and mean time to administration of steroids. We sustained improvement for 18 months after the implementation of our QI interventions.

The Association Between Physician Race/Ethnicity and Patient Satisfaction: an Exploration in Direct to Consumer Telemedicine.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction measures have important implications for physicians. Patient bias against non-White physicians may impact physician satisfaction ratings, but this has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in patient satisfaction by physician race/ethnicity. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeking care on a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine platform between July 2016 and July 2018 and their physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Patient satisfaction was ascertained immediately following the encounter on scales of 1 to 5 stars and scored two ways: (1) top-box satisfaction (5 stars versus fewer) and (2) dissatisfaction (2 or fewer stars versus 3 or more). To approximate the information patients would use to make assumptions about physician race/ethnicity, four reviewers classified physicians into categories based on physician name and photo. These included White American, Black American, South Asian, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, and East Asian. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to assess differences in patient top-box satisfaction and patient dissatisfaction by physician race/ethnicity, controlling for patient characteristics, prescription receipt, physician specialty, and whether the physician trained in the USA versus internationally. KEY RESULTS: The sample included 119,016 encounters with 390 physicians. Sixty percent were White American, 14% South Asian, 7% Black American, 7% Hispanic, 6% Middle Eastern, and 6% East Asian. Encounters with South Asian physicians (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91) and East Asian physicians (aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.99) were significantly less likely than those with White American physicians to result in top-box satisfaction. Compared to encounters with White American physicians, those with Black American physicians (aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.12-2.64), South Asian physicians (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.23-2.56), and East Asian physicians (aOR 2.10; 95% CI 1.38-3.20) were more likely to result in patient dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients reported lower satisfaction with some groups of non-White American physicians, which may have implications for their compensation, professional reputation, and job satisfaction.