Airway changes in patients with sleep apnea using AdvanSync2 Class II correctors - a case series.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a condition that affects a patient's ability to sleep normally, predisposing them to many risks and reduced quality of life. Myofunctional therapy has been proven to increase the airway space according to literature. Aim: To report the effects of AdvanSync2 Class II corrector in the management of 3 orthodontic patients who reported sleeping difficulties due to breathing problems and retrognathic mandible. Case presentation: Three patients reported to Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics with Class II malocclusion associated with sleep apnea requiring treatment. Clinical examination revealed a retrognathic mandible with airway constriction in all subjects. A non-extraction approach using an AdvanSync2 Class II corrector (Ormco Corp, Glendora, Calif) with fixed appliances was considered. Lateral cephalometric records were obtained at three stages: pre-treatment, post functional and prefinishing/post treatment. The airway was divided into 3 parts in the lateral cephalogram: velopharynx, hypopharynx and glossopharynx. The most constricted part of the airway was noted. Pre and post treatment lateral cephalograms were compared to assess the changes in airway dimensions after using AdvanSync2. Significant enhancement in airway dimensions was noted in all three parts (velopharynx, glossopharynx and hypopharynx) in all patients. Conclusion: Airway assessment is an important aspect in orthodontic diagnosis. Use of the AdvanSync2 Class II corrector in combination with fixed orthodontic appliances enhanced quality of life in Class II patients by improving airway dimensions. This approach can be recommended in the management of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions associated with mandibular retrognathism and airway constriction.

Erratum: Retraction notice to "Performance comparison of vibration devices on orthodontic tooth movement - A systematic review and meta-analysis"[J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 10 (2020) 814-823].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.10.013.].

Alleviation of Lower Anterior Crowding with Super- Elastic and Heat-Activated NiTi Wires: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the amount of alleviation of lower anterior crowding and changes in intercanine width (ICW), intermolar width (IMW), and arch depth (AD) dimensions using 2 different types of nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. METHODS: Thirty participants were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups, using heat-activated NiTi (HANT) or super-elastic (SE-NiTi) round (0.014") archwires. The inclusion criteria were a Little's Irregularity Index (LII) greater than 4, malocclusion requiring non-extraction therapy, all teeth erupted to the second molars in the lower arch, and Angle's Class I malocclusion. The primary aim was to measure alleviation in mandibular crowding over 12 weeks; the secondary aim was to measure changes in ICW, IMW, and AD during those 12 weeks. Simple randomization was performed. The measurements were made on dental stone casts using a coordinate measuring machine at 4-week intervals. RESULTS: LII at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks was 8.59 ± 1.44, 6.17 ± 1.65, 4.65 ± 1.63, and 3.28 ± 1.57 mm in the HANT; 8.87 ± 1.29, 6.92 ± 1.49, 5.25 ± 1.32, and 3.63 ± 1.32 mm in the SE-NiTi group, respectively. ICW increased from 25.43 ± 1.39 to 27.41 ± 1.29 mm in the HANT and from 25.81 ± 1.78 to 27.27 ± 1.83 mm in the SE-NiTi groups over a period of 12 weeks, at P < .05. There was a statistically significant increase in IMW, CAD (canine arch depth), and MAD (molar arch depth), favoring the HANT group (P < .05). No significant differences in LII between the 2 groups were noted (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The amount of alleviation of lower anterior crowding was similar with both archwires. ICW, IMW, and AD increased with HANT archwires.

Performance comparison of vibration devices on orthodontic tooth movement - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficiency of vibratory devices in altering rate of orthodontic tooth movement. METHODS: A literature search up to January 31, 2020 was conducted in three electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Science Direct, to identify studies on vibratory devices reporting any alteration in tooth movement as a primary outcome. Only articles published in English language were included. A meta-analysis was done to compare the amount of tooth movement (in mm) in patients treated with vibratory devices compared to control groups, to quantify weighted treatment effects. RESULTS: A total of two split mouth studies, six parallel arm randomized control trials (RCT) one split mouth RCT, and three regular RCTs were assessed qualitatively. Quantitative assessment was done for 8 randomized trials using a forest plot (310 patients). Pooled data showed increase in the amount of tooth movement by 0.34 â€‹mm (95% CI:0.25,0.42). There was a statistically significant difference noted for this result at p â€‹< â€‹0.00001. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests a moderate to high level of certainty in regard to included studies in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Vibratory devices when used in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances show significant increase in the rate of tooth movement. These devices can be used by clinicians to reduce treatment duration and patient discomfort. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020169675.