Primary Versus Revisional Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients with a Body Mass Index ≥ 50 kg/m2-90-Day Outcomes and Risk of Perioperative Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) is an effective treatment for patients with severe obesity. Patients with higher body mass index (BMI) and patients undergoing revisional surgery have a higher rate of major complications. This study purpose is to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 undergoing BMS between 2015 and 2023 was conducted. A comparative analysis was performed between patients undergoing primary versus revisional surgery. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were included in the study. Primary procedures were performed in 220 patients (83.7%) and revisional procedures in 43 patients (16.3%). BMS included one anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 183), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 63), and other procedures (n = 17). Mean BMI was 54.6 with no difference between groups. There was no difference in baseline characteristics except the revisional group was older (44.8 ± 9.6 versus 39 ± 13 years; p = 0.006), had higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (21% vs 7.3%; p = 0.005), and fatty liver disease (74% vs 55%; p = 0.02). There was perioperative mortality in three cases (1.1%) with no significant difference between groups. Leak rates were higher, and length of stay (LOS) was longer in the revisional group (4.6% vs 0.45%; p = 0.018 and 2.9 vs 3.7; p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Revisional BMS in patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 is associated with increased leak rates and LOS. Mortality rate is 1.1% and is insignificantly different between groups. Further prospective and large-scale studies are needed to clarify the optimal surgical approach to patients with extreme BMI including revisional surgery.

Marginal Ulcer Perforation after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Surgical Treatment and Two-Year Outcomes.

Background: Marginal ulcer (MU) perforation is a chronic complication after One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). This study's purpose was to analyze patients undergoing OAGB revision due to MU perforation and describe the two-year outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a database in a single-tertiary hospital. All patients undergoing surgical revision due to MU perforation were included. Results: During the study period, 22 patients underwent OAGB revision due to MU perforation. The rate of MU perforation was 0.98%. The median age was 48 years and there were 13 men (59%). The median time from OAGB to MU perforation was 19 months with a median total weight loss of 31.5%. Nine patients (41%) were smokers. Omental patch (±primary closure) was performed in 19 patients (86%) and three patients (14%) underwent conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). At a median follow-up of 48 months, three patients (14%) had recurrent MU diagnosis, of which one had a recurrent MU perforation. Four patients (18%) underwent conversion to RYGB during follow-up. Conclusions: MU perforation is a chronic complication after OAGB. In this cohort, most patients were men and likely to be smokers. Omental patch was effective in most cases. Recurrent MU rates at two years follow-up were acceptable.

Revision of restrictive bariatric procedures in elderly patients: results at a 5-year follow-up.

Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) is increasing in popularity. Elderly patients (> 65 years old) are sometimes referred for RBS evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of elderly patients undergoing RBS. A retrospective analysis of a cohort from a single-tertiary bariatric center. All elderly patients undergoing RBS after restrictive procedures between 2012 and 2022 were included. Thirty Nine patients undergoing RBS were included in the comparative analysis - 23 patients (57.5%) after adjustable gastric banding (s/p LAGB) and 16 patients (40%) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (s/p SG). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients were comparable (67.2 ± 2.8 years and 38.3 ± 7.4, respectively). There was no difference in associated medical problems except reflux which was higher in s/p SG (68% vs. 13%; p < 0.001). The mean time interval between surgeries was 8.7 ± 5.1 years. The surgeries included One anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 22), SG (n = 8) and Roux-en-y gastric bypass (n = 9). Early major complication rates were comparable (4.3% and 12.5%; p = 0.36), and readmission rate was higher in patients s/p SG (p = 0.03). Ninety percent of patients were available to a follow-up of 59.8 months. The mean BMI and total weight loss was 29.2 and 20.3%, respectively with no difference between groups. The rate of patients with associated medical problems at last follow-up was significantly reduced. Five patients (12.5%) underwent revisional surgery due to complications during follow-up. In conclusion, RBS in the elderly is associated with a reasonable complication rate and is effective in terms of weight loss and improvement of associated medical problems in a 5-year follow-up.

Technical Considerations in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-the Israeli Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Experience.

BACKGROUND: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is gaining popularity worldwide due to its safety and effectiveness. OAGB is the most commonly performed metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) in Israel. Israel is the only country where OAGB is the most prevalent MBS. Our aim is to address OAGB technical aspects using a national survey completed by members of the Israeli Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ISMBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online-survey composed of a 17-item-based questionnaire was sent to ISMBS members. All responses were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 47/64 (73.4%) ISMBS members participated in the survey. Most surgeons (74.5%) had > 10 years of MBS experience, and most (61.7%) performed > 100 MBS/year. The majority (78.7%) perform OAGB as their most common procedure. Most surgeons fashion a 10-15-cm pouch and use a 36-Fr bougie, (57.4% and 38.3%). Regarding bowel length measurement, 70% use visual estimation and 10.6% routinely measure total small bowel length (TSBL). The most common reasons for creating a longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL) were high body mass index (BMI) and revisional surgery (83.3% and 66%, respectively). In a primary procedure of a patient with a BMI = 40, most (76.6%) would create a 150-200-cm BPL. In patients with a BMI > 50 or revisional cases, most (70.2% and 68.0%) would create a 175-225-cm BPL. CONCLUSION: OAGB is the most prevalent MBS performed in Israel. This survey showed common preferences and variations among ISMBS members. Further studies are needed in order to standardize and build a consensus on OAGB technique.

Long Term Effects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) is a rare disorder, linked to severe obesity. The study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) on IIH outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with IIH and severe obesity who underwent MBS. Data were retrieved from prospectively maintained databases of two bariatric surgeons. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included, of them 12 women. Median age was 36 (interquartile range;IQR 21,47) years and body mass index (BMI) was 40.4 (IQR 37.8,41.8) kg/m2. All patients had visual disturbances,12/13 had headaches, and 6/13 had tinnitus. The mean opening pressure on lumbar puncture was 45 cmH2O, and 11/13 patients had papilledema. Medications for IIH were consumed by 11/13 patients, and 2/13 patients had prior surgical intervention for IIH. MBS types included sleeve gastrectomy (n=7), adjustable gastric banding (n=2), roux-en-y gastric bypass (n=2), one anastomosis gastric bypass (n=1), duodenal switch (n=1). At a median follow-up of 10 years (IQR 8,13), the median BMI and total weight loss were 29.7 kg/m2 and 27%, respectively. Remission of symptoms was achieved in 9/13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: MBS results in significant and sustainable weight loss, with subsequent resolution or improvement of IIH. It may be considered as a preventive measure for IIH in patients with severe obesity.

Bariatric Surgery in Severely Obese Kidney Donors Before Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) is the optimal approach for sustained weight loss and may alter donation candidacy in potential donors with obesity. We evaluated the long-term effects of nephrectomy after BS on metabolic profile, including body mass index, serum lipids and diabetes, and kidney function of donors. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. Live kidney donors who underwent BS before nephrectomy were matched for age, gender, and body mass index with patients who underwent BS alone and with donors who underwent nephrectomy alone. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and adjusted to individual body surface area to create absolute eGFR. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients who underwent BS before kidney donation were matched to 46 controls who underwent BS alone. At the last follow-up, the study group showed significantly worse lipid profile with low-density lipoprotein of 115 ± 25 mg/dL versus the control group with low-density lipoprotein of 99 ± 29 mg/dL ( P = 0.036) and mean total cholesterol of 191 ± 32 versus 174 ± 33 mg/dL ( P = 0.046). The second control group of matched nonobese kidney donors (n = 72) had similar serum creatinine, eGFR, and absolute eGFR as the study group before nephrectomy and 1 y after the procedure. At the end of follow-up, the study group had significantly higher absolute eGFR compared with the control group (86 ± 21 versus 76 ± 18 mL/min; P = 0.02) and similar serum creatinine and eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: BS before live kidney donation is a safe procedure that could increase the donor pool and improve their health in the long run. Donors should be encouraged to maintain their weight and avoid adverse lipid profile and hyperfiltration.

Clinical influence of conversion of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease.

PURPOSE: Assess the subjective impact of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms on patients undergoing revision from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire for GERD (RDQ) and the GERD-health related quality of life score (GERD-HRQL), prior to- and following conversion. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision from LSG to OAGB were prospectively followed between May 2015 and December 2020. Data retrieved included demographics, anthropometrics, previous bariatric history, time interval between LSG and OAGB, weight loss, and co-morbidities. Pre- and post-OAGB RDQ and GERD-HRQL questionnaires were obtained. In the case of sleeve dilatation, sleeve resizing was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 37 patients underwent revision from LSG to OAGB. Mean ages at LSG and pre-OAGB were 38 ± 11.74 and 46 ± 12.75, respectively. Median follow-up time was 21.5 months (range 3-65). All patients underwent sleeve resizing. RDQ and GERD-HRQL scores were obtained at a median of 14 months (range 3-51) between pre- and post-OAGB. Median RDQ score pre-OAGB vs post-OAGB was significantly reduced (30 (range 12-72) vs 14 (range 12-60), p = 0.007). All 3 parts of the GERD- HRQL questionnaires were significantly reduced between pre-OAGB and post-OAGB: Symptoms (20; 62.5% vs 10; 31.3%, p = 0.012), overall score (15 (0-39) vs 7 (0-28), p = 0.04) and subjective improvement (10; 31% vs 20; 62.5%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Conversion of LSG to OAGB showed subjective improvement of GERD symptoms both in RDQ and in GERD-HRQL.

Ten-Year Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Retrospectively Designed Study of a Single Tertiary Center.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most popular bariatric surgery. Nonetheless, only a few studies have reported its long-term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate changes in weight and body mass index (BMI) parameters, resolution of comorbidities, and frequency of re-operations in a follow-up period of at least 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was available from 180 patients' records who underwent SG between 2008 and 2011 in the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Eighty patients agreed to partake in a follow-up assessment that was completed via a phone call questionnaire and hospital computed registry. RESULTS: Patients' mean preoperative BMI was 43.86 ± 6.36 kg/m2 which was significantly higher when compared to mean nadir BMI and last follow-up BMI (29.44 ± 7.12 and 36.34 ± 9.7; p < 0.001). Mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 10 years was 42.65 ± 36.02% and mean percentage of total weight loss was 19.33 ± 16.73%. Twenty-eight patients (35%) maintained at least 50% EWL. Twenty-seven (33.75%) patients underwent at least one surgical procedure following SG. Eleven patients (13.75%) underwent a conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and six patients (7.5%) underwent conversion to one anastomosis gastric bypass. Resolution of type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia occurred in 47%, 43.7%, and 48.4%, respectively. De-novo cases of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) were present in 40%. CONCLUSION: SG shows high long-term failure rates. One of every three patients will undergo another surgical procedure within a 10-year period.

Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in patients with cirrhosis; before, during or after liver transplantation: A single center's experience.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of morbid obesity (MO) results in parallel growth of obesity-associated liver diseases necessitating liver transplantation (LT). OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in the setting of LT. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included the data on all the MO candidates before and after LT who underwent bariatric surgery (BS) in our institution between 04/2013-09/2016. The reported outcomes were weight change and early and late postoperative complications (mean follow-up: 43 ± 11.1 months). RESULTS: Eighteen MO peri-LT patients (10 females, 8 males, average age 48 years) were included in the study. Ten had cirrhosis (mean Model of End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] score of 12.5 ± 6.42), three underwent concurrent LT and BS (mean MELD score 23.7 ± 0.58), and five had LT (mean of 56 months from LT). The mean percentage of total and excess weight loss was 31% and 81%, respectively. Six of the eight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus became normoglycemic after BS. Three patients sustained perioperative complications. Two cirrhotic patients died 1 and 4.5 years after BS with decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery appears to effectively address obesity in cirrhotic and LT patients. The surgical risk is higher than that of the regular BS population.

Laparoscopic revision to total gastrectomy or fistulo-jejunostomy as a definitive surgical procedure for chronic gastric fistula after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Staple-line leaks (SLL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are a rare but serious complication requiring radiologic and endoscopic interventions with varying degrees of success. When failed, a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula forms with decreasing chances of closure with time. Definitive surgical management of chronic SLL after SG include laparoscopic revision to total/subtotal gastrectomy (LTG/LSTG) or a fistulo-jejunostomy (LRYFJ), both with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of SG revisions to LTG/LSTG versus LRYFJ as a definitive treatment for chronic SLL. SETTING: High-volume bariatric unit. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 17 patients with chronic gastric fistula after SG that were revised to either LTG/LSTG or LRYFJ between September 2011 and May 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, quality of life, and laboratory values for both options were compared. RESULTS: Of the 17 conversions, 8 were revised to LTG/LSTG and 9 to LRYFJ. Mean age and body mass index at revision were 36.85 years (range, 21-66 yr) and 29 kg/m2 (range, 21-36 kg/m2), respectively. Average preoperative endoscopic attempts was 5 (range, 1-16). The overall average operation time of revision was 183 minutes (range, 130-275 min) with no significant difference between either conversion options. Mean follow-up time was 46.5 months (range, 1-81 mo) and was available for 10 patients (58.8%). Food intolerance was significantly better after revision to LRYFJ (n = 6/6, 100% versus n = 1/5, 20%, P < .05). There were no significant differences between revisional procedures and laboratory abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic revision to LRYFJ is a safe and feasible treatment for chronic SLL.

Prospective Longitudinal Trends in Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes 3 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Longitudinal assessment of body composition following bariatric surgery allows monitoring of health status. Our aim was to elucidate trends of anthropometric and clinical outcomes 3 years following sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 60 patients who underwent SG. Anthropometrics including body composition analysis measured by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, blood tests, liver fat content measured by abdominal ultrasound and habitual physical activity were evaluated at baseline and at 6 (M6), 12 (M12), and 36 (M36) months post-surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients (55% women, age 44.7 ± 8.7 years) who completed the entire follow-up were included. Fat mass (FM) was reduced significantly 1 year post-surgery (55.8 ± 11.3 to 26.7 ± 8.3 kg; P < 0.001) and then increased between 1 and 3 years post-operatively, but remained below baseline level (26.7 ± 8.3 to 33.1 ± 11.1 kg; P < 0.001). Fat free mass (FFM) decreased significantly during the first 6 months (64.7 ± 14.3 to 56.9 ± 11.8 kg; P < 0.001), slightly decreased between M6 and M12 and then reached a plateau through M36. Weight loss "failure" (< 50% excess weight loss) was noticed in 5.0% and 28.3% of patients at M12 and M36, respectively. Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism changed thereafter in parallel to the changes observed in FM, with the exception of HDL-C, which increased continuingly from M6 throughout the whole period analyzed (45.0 ± 10.2 to 59.5 ± 15.4 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and HbA1c which continued to decrease between M12 and M36 (5.5 ± 0.4 to 5.3 ± 0.4%; P < 0.001). There were marked within-person variations in trends of anthropometric and clinical parameters during the 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Weight regain primarily attributed to FM with no further decrease in FFM occurs between 1 and 3 years post-SG. FM increase at mid-term may underlie the recurrence of metabolic risk factors and can govern clinical interventions.

Bariatric Surgery Is Efficacious and Improves Access to Transplantation for Morbidly Obese Renal Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: The surgical risk of morbidly obese patients is high and even higher for kidney transplant candidates. A BMI > 35-40 kg/m2 is often a contraindication for that surgery. The safety, feasibility, and outcome of bariatric surgery for those patients are inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data on morbidly obese renal transplant candidates who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in our institution between January 2009 and September 2017. The reported outcome included body weight and graft status after a mean follow-up of 47 months (range 0.5-5 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (8 females, 16 males, average age 54 years, average preoperative BMI 41 kg/m2 [range 35-51]) underwent LSG (n = 17) or LRYGB (n = 7). Sixteen of them (67%) proceeded to kidney transplantation. Of the 8 pre-transplant and post-bariatric surgery patients, 5 are on the waitlist, and 2 patients died (one of staple line leakage, and one from sepsis unrelated to the bariatric surgery). The average time from bariatric surgery to transplantation was 1.5 years (range 1 month to 4.3 years). The average pre-transplantation BMI was 28 kg/m2 (range 19-36). The mean percentage of excess weight loss was 66% (n = 21), and the total percentage of weight loss was 29% (n = 21). Comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) improved significantly following both surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: LSG and LRYGB appear to effectively address obesity issues before kidney transplantation and improve surgical access. Morbidly obese transplant candidates would benefit from prior bariatric surgery.

Survival benefit in bariatric surgery kidney recipients may be mediated through effects on kidney graft function and improvement of co-morbidities: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the benefits of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity among kidney transplant recipients are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of bariatric surgery on graft function and survival and on obesity-related co-morbidities. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: This case-control study used retrospectively collected data of all kidney recipients who underwent bariatric surgery in our institution between November 2011 and August 2016 (n = 30, 11 females). Nonbariatric operated kidney recipients matched for age, sex, and time elapsed since transplantation served as controls (n = 50, 23 females). Main outcomes were renal function, graft loss events, mortality, and obesity-related co-morbidities. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.3 years for both groups. At final follow-up, there was an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rates for the bariatric surgery group, and a decrease for the controls (13.4 ± 19.9 and -3.9 ± 15.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, P < .001). The chronic kidney disease classification improved in 9 bariatric surgery group patients and in 6 controls (P = .1). Two patients in the bariatric surgery group and 6 controls died. Total death or graft function loss during the follow-up was 6.7% and 16.7%, respectively (P = .3). The total numbers of co-morbidities and medications were lower in the bariatric surgery patients (-.7 and -2, respectively) and higher in the controls (+.3 and +1.1; P < .001) at study closure. CONCLUSIONS: There was an improvement in renal function, graft survival, and obesity-related co-morbidities among kidney transplant recipients who underwent bariatric surgery compared with those who did not. These findings support bariatric surgery in this population and warrant prospective studies.

Obesity-related acetylcholinesterase elevation is reversed following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Impaired sympathetic/parasympathetic response, expressed by elevated Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome and inflammation. However, the association between morbid obesity and AChE and the changes in cholinergic tone following bariatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) surgery-induced weight reduction were never analyzed. METHODS: Two studies are presented; the first (the "apparently healthy cohort") was a cross-sectional study and the second (the "LSG cohort") was a prospective-cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. The "apparently healthy cohort" included 1450 apparently healthy participants who volunteered to the Tel-Aviv Medical Center Inflammation Survey (TAMCIS) during a routine annual checkup visit. The "LSG cohort" included 77 morbid obese patients before and at 3, 6, and 12 months following LSG surgery. Main outcomes included anthropometric measurements, Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C), serum AChE, insulin test and Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA). RESULTS: Among the TAMCIS participants, serum AChE activity increased with BMI in a dose-dependent manner until it reached a peak level at BMI of 30-35 kg/m², followed by a plateau. Following LSG, a significant decrease in AChE activity between baseline and 12 months post-surgery was found for men, but not for women (-122.2 ± 135.3, P < 0.001 vs. -21.8 ± 120.5, P = 0.258 nmol substrate hydrolyzed/min per ml, respectively). The reduction in AChE activity was negatively correlated with %excess weight loss (EWL) and positively correlated with %body fat reduction at 12 months post-surgery among women (r = -0.329, P = 0.034 and r = 0.350, P = 0.023, respectively). In men, AChE activity reduction was positively correlated with the HOMA reduction (r = 0.358, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity-related AChE resistance phenotype may be reversed following LSG and correlates with metabolic outcomes. Further long-term studies will be needed to validate and evaluate the beneficial effect of AChE reduction post bariatric surgery.

Circulating Endocannabinoids Are Reduced Following Bariatric Surgery and Associated with Improved Metabolic Homeostasis in Humans.

BACKGROUND: The endocannabinoid (eCB) system plays a key role in the development of obesity and its comorbidities. Limited information exists on the changes in circulating eCBs following bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (i) assess the circulating levels of eCBs and related molecules and (ii) examine the association between their levels and numerous clinical/metabolic features pre- and post-operatively. METHODS: Sixty-five morbidly obese patients (age 42.78 ± 9.27 years; BMI 42.00 ± 5.01 kg/m2) underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) surgery, and were followed up for 12 months. Data collected included anthropometrics and metabolic parameters. The serum levels of the eCBs, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), anandamide (AEA); and their related molecules, arachidonic acid (AA) and oleoylethanolamine (OEA) were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Levels of 2-AG, AEA, and AA were reduced post operatively with no differences in serum OEA levels. The delta changes in eCB levels between pre- and post-operation were correlated with the delta of different metabolic parameters. Positive correlations were found between delta AA and waist circumference (WC) (r = 0.28, P < 0.05), free fat mass (r = 0.26, P < 0.05), SteatoTest score (r = 0.45, P < 0.05), and ALT (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). Delta AEA levels positively correlated with WC (r = 0.30, P < 0.05). Delta 2-AG levels positively correlated with total cholesterol (r = 0.27, P < 0.05), triglycerides (r = 0.55, P < 0.05), and SteatoTest score (r = 0.27, P < 0.05). Delta OEA levels negatively correlated with fasting glucose levels (r = - 0.27, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides compelling evidence that LSG surgery induces reductions in the circulating 2-AG, AEA, and AA levels, and that these changes are associated with clinical benefits related to the surgery including reduced fat mass, hepatic steatosis, glucose, and improved lipid profile.

The effect of bariatric surgery on hypothyroidism: Sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Hypothyroidism is prevalent in morbidly obese patients and may improve after a weight reduction surgery. OBJECTIVES: Laboratory and clinical changes in hypothyroid patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were compared and evaluated. SETTINGS: Data were retrieved from a prospectively collected database of 2 public bariatric units. METHODS: Patients with hypothyroidism prior to bariatric procedure were evaluated for changes in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and changes or cessation of hormone replacement therapy after surgery. Correlation between changes in TSH levels and percentage of excess weight loss and comparison between effects of LSG and LRYGB were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. Mean follow-up was 11 ± 9 .73 months. Mean body mass index decreased from 43.8 to 33.2 kg/m2. Forty patients had deranged elevated TSH levels prior to surgery that decreased significantly after surgery (mean 6.6 ± 1.9 to 2.9 ± 1.5 mU/L, P < .01). Of patients receiving hormone replacement therapy prior to surgery, 42% required lower doses, with a 61% mean decrease in doses, while 10% stopped hormone replacement therapy completely. No correlation was found between the improvement in TSH and percentage of excess weight loss. A significant advantage to one of the bariatric procedures (LSG [61] and LRYGB [29]) could not be established. CONCLUSIONS: LSG and LRYGB both proved to improve thyroid function in hypothyroid obese patients. No procedure was found to be superior. No correlation was found between percentage of excess weight loss and TSH reduction. This implies that the effect of bariatric surgery on the improvement of thyroid functions is mediated by mechanisms other than weight loss, probably hormonal.

Bariatric surgery in solid organ transplant patients: Long-term follow-up results of outcome, safety, and effect on immunosuppression.

The surgical risk of transplanted patients is high, and the modified gastrointestinal anatomy after bariatric surgery (BS) may lead to pharmacokinetic alterations in the absorption of immunosuppressive drugs. Data on outcomes of BS and the safety and feasibility of maintaining immunosuppression and graft safety among solid organ transplanted patients are scarce. In the current study, weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, and changes in dosage and trough levels of immunosuppression drugs before and after BS were analyzed for all transplanted patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in our institution between November 2011 and January 2017. Thirty-four patients (13 females, 21 males, average age 53 years) were included in the study. A successful weight loss (>50% excess weight loss in 28 of them [82%]) was recorded at the last follow-up. Comorbidities improved significantly. Immunosuppressive stability increased from 39% to 47% among all patients. The tacrolimus blood trough levels declined slightly, but remained within therapeutic range. These data suggest that LSG and LRYGB ensure good immunosuppressive maintenance together with significant weight loss and improvement in comorbidities without serious graft rejection or dysfunction. The surgical risk is higher than in the regular BS population.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to a Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch or a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass due to Weight Loss Failure.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and inadequate weight loss (IWL) are long-term complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and indications for a laparoscopic conversion to an alternative bariatric procedure. The aim of this study is to report the long-term outcomes of biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch (DS) or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as conversion procedures for weight loss failure after LSG. METHODS: The data of all patients who underwent post-LSG conversion to either a RYGB or a DS at our institution between November 2006 and May 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. Included were all patients with > 1-year follow-up who were operated due to IWL or weight regain. Patients with the indication of reflux were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients underwent conversion from LSG to RYGB, DS, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass during the study period. There were 21 revisions to DS and 18 to RYGB that met the inclusion criteria. The respective weight and body mass index (BMI) before and after LSG were 125 and 110 kg and 46 and 40.5 kg/m2 in the RYGB group and 148 and 126 kg and 53.7 and 46 kg/m2 in the DS group. At the last follow-up (> 2 years), 15 RYGB patients had a reduction in BMI of 8.5-31.9 kg/m2 and 18 DS patients had a reduction in BMI of 12.8-31.9 kg/m2. The mean follow-up was 48.5 months (range 24-76). All comorbidities improved or underwent complete remission. CONCLUSION: Conversion from SG to RYGB or DS is an efficient and effective treatment for IWL and improvement of comorbidities. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term weight regain.