Molnupiravir's real-world effectiveness in COVID-19 outpatients at high risk of severe disease: a single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic started in March 2020. Since then, there has been an urgent need for effective therapeutic methods to manage the disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of molnupiravir in reducing the need for hospitalization in at-risk, non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODOLOGY: This was a single-center, non-randomized, observational retrospective study of non-hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19, treated at the Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University Clinical Center in Belgrade, Serbia. RESULTS: The study was conducted between 15 December 2021 and 15 February 2022 and included 320 patients. Of these, 165 (51.6%) received treatment with molnupiravir. The study and control groups were similar in gender and age distribution. The study group had a higher proportion of vaccination (75.2% vs. 51%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in presence of comorbidity within the groups. Majority of the patients who received molnupiravir did not require hospitalization; and this was statistically significant in comparison to control group (92.7 vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). Oxygen supplementation was less frequently required in the study group compared to the control group (0.6% vs. 31%, p < 0.001). During the follow-up period of 12.12 ± 3.5 days, significantly less patients from the study group were admitted to the intensive care unit (p < 0.001). Molnupiravir significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization by 97.9% (HR 0.021; 95% CI 0.005-0.089; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Molnupiravir is an effective therapy in preventing the development of severe forms of COVID-19 and hospitalization.

Potential influence of antimicrobial resistance gene content in probiotic bacteria on the gut resistome ecosystems.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a substantial threat to human health. The commensal bacteria of the gut microbiome were shown to serve as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), termed the gut resistome, which has the potential to transfer horizontally to pathogens and contribute to the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria. Namely, AMR traits are generally linked with mobile genetic elements (MGEs), which apart from disseminating vertically to the progeny, may cross horizontally to the distantly related microbial species. On the other hand, while probiotics are generally considered beneficiary to human health, and are therefore widely consumed in recent years most commonly in conjunction with antibiotics, the complexities and extent of their impact on the gut microbiome and resistome have not been elucidated. By reviewing the latest studies on ARG containing commercial probiotic products and common probiotic supplement species with their actual effects on the human gut resistome, this study aims to demonstrate that their contribution to the spread of ARGs along the GI tract merits additional attention, but also indicates the changes in sampling and profiling of the gut microbiome which may allow for the more comprehensive studying of the effects of probiotics in this part of the resistome.

FIB-4 and APRI scores for predicting severe fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C - a developing country's perspective in DAA era.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection leads to progressive fibrosis making fibrosis staging necessary in the evaluation of such patients. Different fibrosis scores are emerging as possible non-invasive alternatives for liver biopsy. The Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores are the most widely used and the most extensively tested. This study aims to determine if it was possible to accurately use these to identify patients that are unlikely to have severe fibrosis. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and forty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who underwent liver biopsy since January 1st 2014 until May 31st 2017 at the Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases in Belgrade were analyzed. The FIB-4 and APRI scores were calculated for each patient and compared to histologically determined fibrosis stage. RESULTS: A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted in order to compare patients with and without severe fibrosis and to evaluate the accuracy of the fibrosis scores. Patients with non-severe fibrosis were younger, had higher platelet counts and lower transaminase levels. FIB-4 had an AUC of 0.875 and the APRI score had an AUC of 0.861. No patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis had a FIB-4 lower than 1.08. FIB-4 was superior to APRI in identifying patients with severe fibrosis in the study cohort. CONCLUSION: FIB-4 was superior to APRI in the recognition of severe fibrosis. FIB-4 may prove very useful in identifying patients without advanced liver disease, especially if other non-invasive methods are inaccessible.