Deficiencies in the availability of essential musculoskeletal surgical services at 883 health facilities in 24 low- and lower-middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: The sequelae of acute musculoskeletal conditions, especially injuries and infections, are responsible for significant disability in low- and middle-income countries. This study characterizes the availability of selected musculoskeletal surgical services at different tiers of the health system in a convenience sample of 883 health facilities from 24 low- and lower-middle-income countries. METHODS: Selected data points from the World Health Organization's (WHO) tool of situational analysis of surgical availability were extracted from the WHO's database in December, 2013. These included infrastructure, physical resources and supplies, interventions, and human resources. For a descriptive analysis, facilities were divided into two groups based on number of beds (<100, 100-300, and >300) and level of facility (primary referral, secondary/tertiary, and Private/NGO/Mission). Statistical comparison was made between public and Private/NGO/Mission facilities based on number of beds (≤100, 100-300, and >300) using a Chi-Square analysis, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. FINDINGS: Significant deficiencies were noted in infrastructure, physical resources and supplies, and human resources for the provision of essential orthopedic surgical services at all tiers of the health system. Availability was significantly lower in public versus Private/NGO/Mission facilities for nearly all categories in facilities with ≤100 beds, and in a subset of measures in facilities with between 100 and 300 beds. INTERPRETATION: Deficiencies in the availability of orthopedic surgical services were observed at all levels of health facility and were most pronounced at facilities with ≤100 beds in the public sector. Strengthening the delivery of essential surgical services, including orthopedics, at the primary referral level must be prioritized if we are to reduce the burden of death and disability from a variety of emergent health conditions. FUNDING: There were no sources of funding.

Pedicle fat grafts for the prevention of scar in low-back surgery. A preliminary report on the first 92 cases.

Encouraged by the results of an experimental study on dogs, the authors performed pedicle fat grafts in 92 patients. The grafts were used in the following groups of patients: following primary disc removal (37 cases); following scar removal in the multiply operated back with definite root findings (37 cases); in patients with spondylolisthesis who had had prior decompressions but developed fifth lumbar nerve root pain after lateral fusion (6 cases); in three patients with spondylolisthesis and simple decompression; in nine patients with spinal stenosis. Pedicle fat grafts were obtained from the subcutaneous layer of fat of the low back in 85 patients and from the buttocks in seven patients. The grafts were brought through openings in the fascia and muscle and were used to cover the dural sac as well as the margins of the nerve root. They were held in position by a fine suture of silk. The results after a minimum follow-up of 1 year and a maximum of 4 years have been excellent or good in 66 percent of the patients who have had lateral fusion with resultant L5 root compression, in 99 percent of patients with spondylolisthesis and decompression only, and in 66 percent of patients with spinal stenosis. The results in the other two groups compare favorably with those reported in the literature.