The adequacy of user seal checking for N95 respirators compared to formal fit testing: A multicentred observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of the user seal check (USC) in predicting N95 respirator fit. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study conducted from May to September 2020. SETTING: The study setting included three private intensive care units (ICUs) in Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: ICU staff members in three private ICUs in Melbourne and regional Victoria participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure is the proportion of participants who passed a USC and subsequently failed fit testing of an N95 respirator. INTERVENTION: Three different respirators were available: two N95 respirator brands and CleanSpace HALO® powered air-purifying respirator. Participants were sequentially tested on N95 respirators followed by powered air-purifying respirators until either successful fit testing or failure of all three respirators. The first N95 tested was based on the availability on the day of testing. The primary outcome was failure rate of fit testing on the first N95 respirator type passing a USC. RESULTS: Of 189 participants, 22 failed USC on both respirators, leaving 167 available for the primary outcome. Fifty-one of 167 (30.5%, 95% confidence interval = 23.7-38.1) failed fit testing on the first respirator type used that had passed a USC. CONCLUSION: USC alone was inadequate in assessing N95 respirator fit and failed to detect inadequate fit in 30% of participants. Mandatory fit testing is essential to ensure adequate respiratory protection against COVID-19 and other airborne pathogens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620001193965.

Unexpected suicide left ventricle post-surgical aortic valve replacement requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support despite gold-standard therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Suicide left ventricle is a well-documented phenomenon occurring after valve replacement, however, it is most commonly described in the mitral valve replacement (MVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) population. Cases within the surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) population usually resolve with optimal medical and interventional therapies. We describe a case of left ventricular suicide following SAVR presenting with persistent haemodynamic instability despite currently accepted medical and surgical therapies. CASE SUMMARY: A 62-year-old male with severe aortic stenosis presented for SAVR and a MAZE procedure. There were no significant signs of ventricular hypertrophy on preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Intraoperatively, there was mild chordal systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve (SAM) which only occurred when underfilled. During recovery in the intensive care unit, the patient's pulmonary arterial pressures were noted to rise with worsening cardiac output. Subsequent TTE showed severe dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction secondary to SAM. Due to refractory medical management, an alcohol septal ablation was performed. Despite resolution of obstruction, the patient exhibited biochemical signs of systemic hypoperfusion, and thus veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support was initiated. Following 72 h of VA-ECMO support, the patient was weaned with complete resolution of biochemical insults. He was subsequently discharged from the hospital without complication. DISCUSSION: Compared to the TAVR population, suicide ventricle post-SAVR is comparatively rare. Patients who exhibit persistent impaired cardiac output postoperatively should be investigated rapidly with echocardiography. Furthermore, resolution of a LVOT obstruction state from procedural intervention may not immediately follow with improved cardiac output, and may require further supportive management.

Pain assessment in the paediatric Emergency Department: whose view counts?

OBJECTIVES: To compare patient, guardian and professional assessment of acute pain in children presenting to an Emergency Department, and to examine whether there was a correlation between the scores obtained using the Faces and linear scales for each group. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study of 73 children aged 4-14 years attending a paediatric hospital Emergency Department between March and April 2002 with pain caused by an acute injury. The child's pain on admission, as estimated by the child, their guardian and a healthcare professional (nurse/doctor/emergency nurse practitioner) was recorded using a Faces scale and a linear scale. RESULTS: Professionals consistently score pain lower [median linear scale score 3.1; interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-5.3] than do patients (6.6; 4.9-7.4) or guardians (6.0; 3.9-7.1) using both linear and Faces scales. There is a significant correlation between pain scores obtained using the two scales for professionals [Spearman R value 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.93], guardians (0.83; 0.74-0.89) and patients (0.42; 0.21-0.59). CONCLUSION: Professionals score pain lower than do children or guardians. Similar pain scores are obtained using both a Faces and a linear scale. This study offers no support for the introduction of a uniform pain assessment tool in a paediatric Emergency Department setting.