RESUMO
Although sleep disruption has emerged as a theoretically consistent and empirically supported suicide risk factor, the mechanistic pathways underlying the sleep-suicide link are less understood. This paper describes the methodology of a study intended to examine longitudinal mechanisms driving the link between sleep and suicide in Veterans at elevated suicide risk. Participants will be 140 Veterans hospitalized for suicide attempt or ideation with plan and intent or those identified through the Suicide Prevention Coordinator (SPC) office as being at acute risk. After study enrollment, actigraphy and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data will be collected for 8 weeks, with follow-up assessments occurring at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 26 weeks. Participants respond to EMA questionnaires, derived from psychometrically validated assessments targeting emotional reactivity, emotion regulation, impulsivity, suicide risk, and sleep timing constructs, five times a day. First and last daily EMA target sleep parameters including sleep quantity, quality, timing, nightmares, and nocturnal awakenings. During follow-up assessments, participants will complete self-report assessments and interviews consistent with EMA constructs and the Iowa Gambling Task. The primary outcome for aim 1 is suicide ideation severity and for the primary outcome for aim 2 is suicide behavior. Findings from this study will improve our understanding of the dynamic interactions among sleep disturbance, emotion reactivity/regulation, and impulsivity to inform conceptual Veteran sleep-suicide mechanistic models. Improved models will be critical to optimizing the precision of suicide prevention efforts that aim to intervene and mitigate risk in Veteran populations, especially during a period of acute risk.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Veteran suicide rates continue to be unacceptably high, with the most common risk factor being a past suicide attempt (SA). However, some characteristics of suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior among Veterans hospitalized for suicide risk remain under-reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three Veterans hospitalized for either an SA or SI with intent were screened for enrollment in a treatment study to prevent suicide. Veterans completed a demographic form, the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and the McLean borderline personality disorder screening measure shortly after inpatient psychiatric admission. Chi-squared and t-tests were used to compare suicide characteristics (e.g., intensity, duration, deterrents, and controllability) between Veterans with and without a lifetime history of SA. Thematic analyses of the reported method of SI were conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of participants were hospitalized for SI and 33% were hospitalized for SA. Twenty-one percent of Veterans hospitalized for SI also endorsed a recent SA in the weeks preceding hospitalization. Most participants reported at least one lifetime SA (71%). Veterans with a lifetime history of SA reported greater frequency and duration of ideation in the week before hospitalization (t[169] = -2.56, P = .01; t[168] = -2.04, P = .04) while also reporting that deterrents were less likely to prevent an SA (t[107.09] = -3.58, P = .001) compared to those with no lifetime SA. CONCLUSION: Overall, Veterans hospitalized for SI/SA demonstrated markers of chronic suicide risk, as most participants endorsed a past attempt in their lifetime. Some Veterans admitted for SI also reported a past month's attempt, suggesting that in certain cases, hospitalization does not immediately follow an acute suicidal crisis. A past SA differentiated Veterans on average frequency and duration of SI as well as the perception of deterrents preventing suicidal behavior. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of suicide methods and intensity may be informative in treatment planning for Veterans at greatest risk of suicide.
