[Teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and informed consent-Are we ready for a paradigm shift?] / Anästhesiologische Risikoevaluation und rechtssichere Aufklärung per Telemedizin ­ Sind wir bereit für einen Paradigmenwechsel?

In Germany, approximately 17 million anaesthesiological procedures and, consequently, roughly the same number of preoperative consultations are conducted each year. So far, these have predominantly taken place in person. However, recent developments in technology, medical-legal aspects, and politics, combined with the catalyzing effect of the pandemic situation, have led to a significant boost in telemedicine. In the field of anaesthesia, there are new approaches to implementing telemedicine in the pre- and postoperative setting. This article focuses on the preoperative setting and presents general requirements for a teleconsultation as preoperative evaluation, the current state of technology, and medical-legal aspects.

Teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A technical and medical feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: During the surge in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in early 2020, many medical organisations began developing strategies for implementing teleconsultation to maintain medical services during lockdown and to limit physical contact. Therefore, we developed a teleconsultation preoperative evaluation platform to replace on-site preoperative meetings. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the feasibility of a teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and procedure-associated adverse events. DESIGN: Implementation study. SETTING: A tertiary care university hospital in Germany from April 2020 to October 2020. PATIENTS: One hundred and eleven patients scheduled for elective surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to receive teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and to complete a subsequent survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints were medical and technical feasibility, user satisfaction and time savings. RESULTS: For 100 out of 111 patients, telepreoperative consultations allowed for adequate perioperative risk assessment, patient education and also for effective collection of legal signatures. For six patients (5.4%), consultations could not be started because of technical issues, whereas for five patients (4.8%), clearance for surgery could not be granted because of medical reasons. A clear majority of anaesthetists (93.7%) rated the telepreoperative evaluations as equivalent to on-site meetings. The majority of the patients considered teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation as convenient as an on-site meeting (98.2%) and would choose a teleconsultation again (97.9%). Median travel time saved by patients was 60 min (Q1 40, Q3 80). We registered one adverse event: we detected atrial fibrillation in one patient only immediately prior to surgery. CONCLUSION: Telepreoperative evaluations are medically and technically feasible, yielding high satisfaction rates on both sides. However, regarding patient safety, not every patient is equally well suited. Overall, implementation of teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation into clinical routine could help maintain medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04518514, ClinicalTrials.gov.