The power of written word: Reflection reduces errors of omission.

BACKGROUND: Medical trainees are expected to perform complex tasks while experiencing interruptions, which increases susceptibility to errors of omission. In our study, we examine whether documentation of clinical encounters increases reflective thinking and reduces errors of omission among novice learners in a simulated setting. METHODS: In 2021, 56 senior medical students participated in a simulated paging curriculum involving urgent inpatient cross-cover scenarios (sepsis and atrial fibrillation). Students responded to pages from standardized registered nurses (SRNs) via telephone, gathered history, and discussed clinical decision-making. Following the phone encounter, students documented a brief note (documentation encounter). A 'phone' score (number of checklist items completed in the phone encounter) and a 'combined' score (number of checklist items completed in the phone and documentation encounters) were calculated. Data were analyzed for differences between the phone scores (control) and combined scores using T-tests and McNemar test of symmetry. FINDINGS: Fifty-four students (96%) participated. Combined scores were higher than phone scores for sepsis (72.8 ± 11.3% vs. 67.9 ± 11.9%, p < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (74.0 ± 10.1% vs. 67.6 ± 10.0%, p < 0.001) cases. Important items, such as ordering blood cultures for sepsis (p = 0.023) and placing the patient on telemetry for atrial fibrillation (p = 0.013), were more likely to be present when a note was documented. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that documentation provides a mechanism for learners to reflect, which could increase important diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. CONCLUSION: Documentation by novice medical learners may improve patient care by allowing for reflection and reducing errors of omission.

Certified Nurse-Midwives as Teachers: Expanding Interprofessional Collaboration Learning Opportunities for Medical Students on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.

INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional experiences provide critical exposure to collaborative health care teams, yet medical students often lack this experience during clinical clerkships. We created a labor and delivery triage rotation exclusively staffed by certified nurse-midwives in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship to address this gap. We sought to evaluate the clinical learning experiences of medical students rotating on this midwife-supervised collaborative team. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, we electronically sent all medical students an evaluation after each required clerkship. Our primary outcome was the quality of teaching score, as defined by level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale with a statement regarding teaching quality. A secondary outcome evaluated scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination taken by all students at the end of the rotation. Evaluations and assessments were compared between students rotating on labor and delivery triage and those who did not. Evaluation comments from students rotating on labor and delivery triage were collated to identify common themes. RESULTS: Of 374 students, 370 (98.9%) completed the end-of-clerkship course evaluation and 312 (83.4%) completed teaching evaluations. Sixty-seven students (17.9%) rotated in labor and delivery triage; of these, 52 (77.6%) completed both the course and triage rotation evaluations. There were no differences in the mean quality of teaching scores (3.9 ± 1.2 versus 3.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.54) or in NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination scores between students rotating in labor and delivery triage compared to all other rotations (79.9% ± 7.2% vs 80.2% ± 7.8%, P = 0.436). Comments from teaching evaluations highlighted student exposure to the midwifery philosophy of care model. DISCUSSION: This work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of this midwife-led authentic interprofessional collaborative experience for medical students. This model can serve as an example of how to implement and evaluate interprofessional collaboration experiences in the clinical setting.

Internal medicine paging curriculum to improve physician-nurse interprofessional communication: a single center pilot study.

Effective physician-nurse communication is critical to patient safety, yet internal medicine trainees are rarely given feedback on this skill. In order to address this gap, we developed a 4-week simulated paging curriculum for senior medical students. Standardized Registered Nurses administered five acute inpatient paging cases to students via telephone and scored communication on a 10-point global scale (1 = highly ineffective to 10 = highly effective) and seven communication domains using a 5-point Likert-type scale. The domains included precision/clarity, instructive, directing, assertive, ability to solicit information, engaged, and structured communication. Students received verbal and written feedback from the nurses on communication skills and clinical decision-making. Our primary goal was to determine if student-nurse communication improved throughout the curriculum. Data were analyzed using multivariate ANOVAs with repeated measures. Twenty-seven students participated. Global communication scores increased significantly from case 1 to case 5 (7.1 to 8.7, p < .01). The following communication domains increased significantly: precision (3.8 to 4.4, p < .01), instructive (3.6 to 4.7, p < .01), directing (4.0 to 4.6, p = .02), assertiveness (4.0 to 4.7, p = .04), engaged (4.1 to 4.7, p < .01). In conclusion, this curriculum can be an innovative approach to improve physician-nurse communication using standardized registered nurses to deliver structured feedback to medical trainees.

The decline in attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration from medical school to residency.

While interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of optimal patient care, practicing physicians often have sub-optimal attitudes regarding the importance of collaboration with their nursing colleagues. The impact of clinical training on medical students' and residents' attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration has not been investigated. The primary goal of our study was to examine if learners at different stages in their medical training had more or less favorable attitudes regarding interprofessional collaboration (IPC). A secondary goal was to compare residents in procedural versus non-procedural specialties to determine if attitudes toward IPC varied by specialty type. Third-year medical students and residents at a large public university completed the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration. Student (n = 129) and resident (n = 292) scores were compared using Student's t-tests. Resident responses were further analyzed by specialty type. Students' perceptions of the physician-nurse relationship were significantly more favorable than the views of residents, particularly in the "Authority" and "Responsibility" domains. Residents in procedural specialties had less favorable attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration than those in non-procedural specialties. Our findings highlight the importance of developing effective interventions for improving interprofessional collaboration during medical training.

Identifying Medical Student Mistreatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the mistreatment identified within the University of Michigan's Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clerkship and compare the rates of mistreatment to that of other clerkships in an effort to improve the learning environment. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study looking at multiple sources of data from 2015 to 2018 about student mistreatment including end-of-rotation and teaching evaluations completed by students, as well as an online reporting system available to medical students. For evaluations, students were asked to rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, to 5 = strongly agree). Narrative comments were also solicited and evaluated. SETTING: University of Michigan Medical School and Michigan Medicine Ob/Gyn Department, Ann Arbor, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 513 students rotated through the Ob/Gyn clerkship between 2015 and 2018 and were asked to complete evaluations. RESULTS: Five hundred and five of the 513 students completed evaluations between 2015 and 2018. In response to the statement, "Students are treated in a professional/respectful manner in this clerkship," the Ob/Gyn clerkship's mean scores on a 5-point scale were 4.45 (in 2015-2016), 4.52 (in 2016-2017), and 4.27 (in 2017-2018). These means, as well as the means to 3 other professionalism questions, were lower than the range of 4.42 to 4.84 for all other third-year clerkships over this time. The mean scores were also lower for Ob/gyn when compared to the Surgery clerkship. A total of 32 narrative comments were submitted by students between 2015 and 2017 related to mistreatment or unprofessional behavior. Frequent themes included students being treated as "stupid" or discouraged from asking questions (8 comments), being treated in an unprofessional manner by staff (7 comments), feeling ignored or marginalized by faculty (4 comments), and faculty unprofessional behavior toward others (4 comments). CONCLUSIONS: Students on the Ob/Gyn clerkship reported a higher rate of mistreatment compared to other clerkships. Efforts are being made by the Ob/Gyn department to communicate these data on mistreatment to educators in order to improve the Ob/Gyn culture and learning environment for medical students.

Multidisciplinary approach to manage antenatally suspected placenta percreta: updated algorithm and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Due to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with placenta percreta, alternative management options are needed. Beginning in 2005, our institution implemented a multidisciplinary strategy to patients with suspected placenta percreta. The purpose of this study is to present our current strategy, maternal morbidity and outcomes of patients treated by our approach. METHODS: From 2005 to 2014, a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected placenta percreta at an academic tertiary care institution was performed. Treatment modalities included immediate hysterectomy at the time of cesarean section (CHYS), planned delayed hysterectomy (interval hysterectomy 6 weeks after delivery) (DH), and fertility sparing (uterine conservation) (FS). Prognostic factors of maternal morbidity were identified from medical records. Complications directly related to interventional procedures and DH was recorded. Descriptive statistics were utilized. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients with suspected placenta percreta, 7 underwent CHYS, 13 underwent DH, and 1 had FS with uterine preservation. Of the 20 cases that underwent hysterectomy, final pathology showed 11 increta, 7 percreta, and 2 inconclusive. 19/20 cases underwent interventional radiology (IR) procedures. Selective embolization was utilized in 14 cases (2/7 CHYS; 12/13 DH). The median time from cesarean section (CS) to DH was 41 [26-68] days. There were no cases of emergent hysterectomy, delayed hemorrhage, or sepsis in the DH group. Both estimated blood loss and number of packed red blood cell transfusions were significantly higher in the CHYS group. 3/21 cases required massive transfusion (2 CHYS, 1 FS) with median total blood product transfusion of 13 units [12-15]. The four IR-related complications occurred in the DH group. Incidence of postoperative complications was similar between both groups. Median hospital length of stay (LOS) after CHYS was 4 days [3-8] compared to DH cohort: 7 days [3-33] after CS and 4 days [1 -10] after DH. The DH cohort had a higher rate of hospital readmission of 54% (7/13) compared to 14% (1/7) CHYS, most commonly due to pain. There were no maternal deaths. CONCLUSION: This multidisciplinary strategy may appear feasible; however, further investigation is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative approaches to cesarean hysterectomy in cases of morbidly adherent placenta.

Providing Informed Consent: A Standardized Case.

INTRODUCTION: From the first day of residency, residents may be required to consent patients for interventions, procedures, or tests. The ability to perform an informed consent is considered one of the Association of American Medical College's Core Entrustable Professional Activities for entering residency. This case provides learners with the opportunity to obtain informed consent for a lumbar puncture procedure and to receive immediate structured feedback on their performance. This is a formative assessment, which has been used with both senior medical students and first-year residents at our institution. METHODS: The case involves a standardized patient with a history of leukemia who presents to the emergency department with a headache, fever, and lethargy. The learner is charged with the task of compassionately, honestly, and confidently explaining the process of a lumbar puncture in order to appropriately obtain informed consent. RESULTS: This case was well received, with the vast majority of learners rating the instructions as clear and the tasks of the station as appropriate for the level of learner. Comments provided by the learners regarding the standardized patients' feedback indicate that this is a useful exercise to assist with the development of the crucial skill of obtaining informed consent. DISCUSSION: Overall, learners are able to perform this task and find it a meaningful exercise. We are able to measure both content and communication skills. In our cohort, learners are able to perform above the targeted passing score. This provides some evidence of competency in terms of both content and communication skills.