Depression: another cortisol-related comorbidity in patients with adrenal incidentalomas and (possible) autonomous cortisol secretion.

PURPOSE: Hypercortisolism is associated with a high prevalence of depression and impaired health-related quality of life (QoL). According to the available literature, studies examining the depression risk in patients with adrenal incidentalomas (AI), nonfunctioning and the ones with (possible) autonomous cortisol secretion ((P)ACS) are scarce. The aim of this observational, case-control study was to screen patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas (NAI) and the ones with (P)ACS for depression and to assess their QoL. METHODS: The total studied group consisted of 92 subjects-26 with NAI, 34 with (P)ACS and 32 age-matched healthy controls (HC). To screen for depression, we used the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and to assess the QoL, we used the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Patients with (P)ACS had significantly higher BDI-II scores and substantially lower QoL than patients with NAI or HC. Midnight cortisol level was the most significant predictor of BDI-II and SF-36 score. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a midnight cortisol value of 86.95 nmol/l had a high sensitivity (82.8%) and high specificity (80%) for detection of mild depression in patients with (P)ACS. CONCLUSION: Screening for depression and QoL assessment should become an integral part of clinical evaluation in patients with (P)ACS.

The effect of parathyroidectomy on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism - an never ending story?

Previous studies demonstrated insulin resistance and increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The effect of curative parathyroidectomy on insulin sensitivity was associated with conflicting results depending on which method for measuring the insulin sensitivity has been used. There was no improvement using HOMA and QUICKI while minimal model demonstrated significant improvement in insulin sensitivity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the insulin sensitivity before and after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT using a euglycemic clamp. 44 patients with PHPT and 11 age and body mass index matched healthy controls participated in study protocol. Before surgery M values and HOMA IR suggest insulin resistance in patients with PHPT. There was no difference in M index (3.74±1.89 vs. 4.62±2.27, p>0.05), HOMA IR (2.94±1.39 vs. 3.29±0.81, p>0.05), AUC glucose (863.0±261.3 vs. 842.3±165.5, p>0.05), AUC insulin (7068.7±4159.0 vs. 7229.6±2581.7, p>0.05), ISI (4.73±2.77 vs. 4.25±2.94, p>0.05) and AIR (47.89±32.05 vs. 38.96±21.20, p>0.05) between patients with PHPT and HC. There was significant improvement in insulin sensitivity after parathyroidectomy but both preoperative and postoperative M values were not significantly different in comparison to HC. There were no significant changes in HOMA IR, AUC glucose, AUC insulin, ISI and AIR before and after therapy. In conclusion, we observed significant improvement in insulin sensitivity after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT. There was no difference in parameters of insulin secretion before and after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT.

Total ghrelin levels during acute insulin infusion in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Controversial data were reported concerning fasting ghrelin (decreased, normal or elevated) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of our study was to clarify ghrelin levels in non-obese, overweight, and obese PCOS patients; to investigate the effect of acute insulin infusion on ghrelin in PCOS as a chronic insulin-resistant state, with and without the impact of obesity, and to examine ghrelin-androgen interaction. In that order, we evaluated 1) ghrelin levels among 8 nonobese patients with PCOS [body mass index (BMI): 20.52+/-1.31 kg/m2], 8 overweight and obese patients with PCOS (BMI: 34.36+/-6.53 kg/m2) and their respective controls, 2) ghrelin suppression during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, and 3) ghrelin-androgen interrelationship. After overnight fast, 2-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, was performed in all investigated women. Fasting ghrelin was significantly lower in non-obese PCOS than in controls (64.74+/-25.69 vs 108.36+/-52.60; p<0.05) as well as in overweight and obese PCOS in comparison with controls (38.71+/-14.18 vs 98.77+/-40.49; p<0.05). Insulin infusion significantly suppressed ghrelin in all subgroups of investigated women. Analysis of variance for repeatable measures confirmed that there was no significant difference in pattern of response between PCOS and controls. In conclusion, women with PCOS had lower fasting ghrelin and decreased insulin sensitivity independently of their BMI, compared to the controls. In addition, there were no differences between fasting ghrelin levels among non-obese, overweight, and obese women with PCOS. During euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, ghrelin decreased in all studied groups to a similar extent, implying that, compared to chronic hyperinsulinemia, acute hyperinsulinemia reduces ghrelin levels independently of the degree of insulin resistance.

Effect of biphasic insulin aspart on glucose and lipid control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) monotherapy in insulin-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 12-week, open-labelled, uncontrolled, clinical-experience study involving 71 patients with secondary oral antidiabetic agent failure, patients received BIAsp 30 after discontinuing oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Glucose and lipid concentrations, hypoglycaemic episodes and adverse events were assessed before and after treatment. Patient data were categorised according to previous OADs into the biguanides (BI) plus sulfonylureas/meglitinides (SU/MEG) and SU-only groups. RESULTS: After treatment, glucose and lipid control was significantly improved in both groups, with a greater improvement in the SU-only group. Mean glycated haemoglobin, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose excursion improved by 2.15 +/- 1.24%, 3.70 +/- 3.18 mmol/l and 1.26 +/- 2.65 mmol/l in the BI plus SU/MEG group, and by 3.09 +/- 1.62%, 6.11 +/- 5.02 mmol/l and 2.06 +/- 2.33 mmol/l in the SU-only group, respectively. Mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides improved by 0.09 +/- 0.18 mmol/l and 0.94 +/- 1.17 mmol/l in the BI plus SU/MEG group and by 0.09 +/- 0.18 mmol/l and 1.04 +/- 2.72 mmol/l in the SU-only group, respectively. No major hypoglycaemic episodes or serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that BIAsp 30 treatment safely improved glucose and lipid control in insulin-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on BI plus SU/MEG and SU-only. Key limitations were the lack of a comparator group and the short study duration.

[Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative localization of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the pancreas].

BACKGROUND: Preoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) is usually very difficult. Noninvasive, imaging tests, such as abdominal ultrasound, CT or MRI are not sensitive enough as well as selective angiography. The aim of the study was to clarify the usefulness of the EUS in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET. METHODS: From September 1998 March 2005, EUS was performed in 1600 patients. Among them, in 10 (0.7%), this examination was carried out due to previous biochemical tests, which diagnosed the pancreatic NET. We studied the location, the size and echo-pattern of the neoplasm. The results were compared with operation and histology or EUS- FNA guided pancreatic biopsy in 9/10 patients. All EUS examinations were performed using Olympus GIF-130 videoecho-endoscope with 7,5 /12MHz switchable radial probe. RESULTS: EUS correctly localized the pancreatic NET in 7/8 cases, (sensitivity:87.5%). In 2 patients, EUS accurately exclouded pancreatic NET. There were no false positive findings (specificity 100%). Six tumours were benign (75%), and two were malign (25%). We localized 6 insulinomas and single pancreatic carcinoid tumour. The median tumour size detected by EUS was 21mm. CONCLUSION: EUS is highly accurate in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET-s and We confirmed it in our study. EUS presents the method of choice for preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET.

Growth-hormone response to combined stimulation with GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome before and after short-term fasting.

Controversial data were reported on GH response to different provocative stimuli in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of our study was to assess the effect of short-term fasting on GH response to combined stimulus with GHRH+GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in obese patients with PCOS and possible relation with leptin and insulin changes during fasting. Twelve obese PCOS women and nine obese control women participated in 3-day fasting. GH response, IGF-I, insulin and leptin were measured after GHRH+ GHRP-6, before and after short-term fasting. Obese PCOS patients had significantly greater GH peak after GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting. Enhanced response to GH stimulation was found after fasting without substantial differences between obese PCOS and obese controls. Insulin and leptin significantly decreased, while insulin sensitivity significantly improved in both groups during fasting. In conclusion, obese PCOS patients have peculiar type of GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting, possibly due to enhanced sensitivity of somatotrophs. Observed changes in insulin and leptin may participate in modulation of enhanced GH response after short-term fasting to GHRH+GHRP-6 in PCOS and obese controls.

Effect of 12 months of recombinant human growth hormone replacement therapy on insulin sensitivity in GH-deficient adults as determined by different methods.

BACKGROUND: Controversial results have been obtained in measuring insulin sensitivity (S(I)) during recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment in adult growth hormone deficient (GH-deficient) patients. AIMS: The aim of our study was to estimate S(I) before and during treatment using three different methods for quantifying insulin sensitivity in GH-deficient adults treated with rhGH. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Twenty-one GH-deficient adults were treated with rhGH during 12 months. S(I) was estimated using Minimal model analysis, Homeostatic Model of Assessment (HOMA) and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) before and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of rhGH therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) and Frequently Sampled Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (FSIGT) were performed in each patient at respective time intervals. QUICKI and HOMA were calculated using basal values of glucose and insulin from FSIGT. Minimal model computer analysis was calculated from glucose and insulin data obtained during FSIGT. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Area under the curve for glucose, insulin and C-peptide were calculated using trapezoidal rule from OGTT data. Differences and correlations were tested using ANOVA for repeated measures, Wilcoxon's matched-paired test, paired t-test, Pearson's correlation and Bland Altman plot. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in S(I) using Minimal model analysis and QUICKI during rhGH treatment. On the contrary, HOMA analysis indicated significant deterioration in S(I) after 12 months of therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study did not demonstrate any changes in S(I) using Minimal model and QUICKI analysis, while there was significant increase in insulin resistance using HOMA model. We suggest that the choice of method for the determination of S(I) may influence the interpretation of results concerning the effect of rhGH therapy on S(I) in GH-deficient adults.

Cardiovascular risk in adolescent and young adult obese females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) could have associated risk for cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between age and metabolic factors on cardiovascular risk in obese women with PCOS. Obese patients with PCOS were divided into an adolescent group (n=11; age 16.90 +/- 0.45 yr; BMI 35.04 +/- 1.70 kg/m2), and an adult group (n=18; age 29.66 +/- 1.31; BMI 34.57 +/- 1.46). We determined basal values of glucose, insulin, lipid and fibrinolytic parameters from blood samples taken in all patients and matched controls. Significantly different concentrations between the groups with PCOS were obtained for glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol and Apo-B. Elevated concentrations of insulin (20.63 mU/l), both insulin sensitivity indexes--G:I ratio (7.52 mg/10(-4) U) and HOMA model (4.11 mmol/l x U/l(2))--and PAI-1 (5.49 U/ml) were obtained in the adolescent group with PCOS compared to controls, with further increase in the adult group with PCOS. It seems that the youngest obese population with PCOS represents a cohort with potential cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Ovulation induction and early pregnancy loss in a woman susceptible to autoimmune diseases: a possible interrelationship.

We report a 34-year-old woman with sequentially occurring autoimmune diseases that are possibly triggered by numerous ovulation inductions. At the ages of 26-32 years, she experienced 27 uncontrolled ovulation induction cycles using clomiphene citrate (CC) or CC plus human menopausal gonadotropin plus human chorionic gonadotropin. She became pregnant at the ages of 27, 30 and 31 with subsequent pregnancy loss in the 28th, 8th and 10th week of gestation, respectively. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) developed at the age of 28. During the second year of ovulation induction, at the age of 27, she developed arthralgia that worsened and became migratory from the age of 31. Thrombocytopenia appeared at the age of 33. The diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was established at the age of 34. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of concurrent IDDM, SLE and APS in a patient associated with ovulation inductions. Excessive levels of estradiol achieved during the ovulation inductions could play a role in the expression of multiple autoimmune diseases in the susceptible woman.

White Addison's disease: what is the possible cause?

A case of chronic primary adrenal insufficiency without hyperpigmentation in a 64-year-old woman is reported. Due to the absence of hyperpigmentation the diagnosis was delayed and she became critically ill. During endocrine evaluation, in order to investigate the mechanism responsible for the absence of hyperpigmentation, skin biopsy was done and hormones responsible for the skin pigmentation were measured. Absence of hyperpigmentation is explained by high degree of melanosome degradation in secondary lysosomes called "compound melanosomes", which overwhelmed increased stimulation of the skin pigmentation. Melanocyte-stimulating hormones were elevated with a strikingly high beta-LPH/ACTH ratio. To our knowledge, this is the first study of pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the absence of hyperpigmentation in white Addison's disease.

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 and GH-releasing hormone in normal-weight and overweight patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) was found to be either decreased or normal. The recent introduction of a new and potent GH stimulus, GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), allowed further investigation of the functional properties of somatotropes in a variety of metabolic diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the response of GH to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH in NIDDM patients. Twenty-one patients with NIDDM were divided into two groups: group A, normal weight (body mass index [BMI], 23.31+/-0.62 kg/m2); and group B, overweight (BMI, 27.62+/-0.72 kg/m2). Eight normal-weight control subjects (group C) were studied. Each subject received GHRP-6 (90 microg intravenously [i.v.]), GHRH (100 microg i.v.), and GHRP-6 + GHRH on three separate occasions. There was no difference between the GH response after GHRP-6 in groups A, B, and C in terms of the GH peak (50.95+/-11.55, 51.96+/-7.71, and 70.07+/-15.59 mU/L, P>.05) and the area under the curve (AUC) for GH (2,340.06+/-617.36, 2,684.54+/-560.57, 3,462.78+/-1,223.53 mU/L/120 min, P>.05). A decreased GH response to GHRH was found in group B in comparison to group A (B v A: peak GH response, 8.25+/-1.90 v 22.19+/-8.81, P<.05; AUC GH, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,443.21+/-743.76, P<.05). There was no difference in the GH response between group A and group C (peak GH response, 22.19+/-8.81 v 26.42+/-6.71, P>.05; AUC, 1,443.21+/-743.76 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P>.05). There was a significant difference between the same parameters in group B versus group C (8.25+/-1.90 v 26.42+/-6.71, P<.05; AUC, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P<.05). The combined administration of GHRP-6 + GHRH elicited a synergistic GH response in NIDDM patients and controls. There was a significant difference between groups A and B for the GH peak (96.49+/-9.80 v 68.38+/-8.25, P<.05), whereas there was no difference for the AUC (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 3,425.95+/-459.67, P>.05). There was no difference in the peak GH after the combined test between group A and group C (96.49+/-9.80 v 139.82+/-24.16, P>.05), whereas the peak GH in the same test was significantly decreased in group B in comparison to group C (68.38+/-8.25 v 139.82+/-24.16, P<.05). The AUC for GH after combined GHRP-6 + GHRH in group A versus group C was not significantly different (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P>.05), whereas there was a significant difference for the same test between group B and group C (3,425.95+/-459.67 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P<.05). Our results demonstrate that normal-weight NIDDM patients have a preserved GH response to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH, and overweight NIDDM patients have a blunted response to GHRH and GHRP-6 + GHRH. The preserved GH response to GHRP-6 in both diabetic groups suggests that the secretory potential of somatotropes is preserved in NIDDM patients. The impairment of the GH response to GHRH in overweight NIDDM patients could be a functional defect due to the obesity, since it could be overridden by administration of GHRP-6.

Leptin levels and insulin sensitivity in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

The study was conducted to assess leptin levels and insulin sensitivity in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Twenty-two women with PCOS and 19 control healthy women were included in the study, divided into obese and non-obese groups. Leptin was determined using Linco Research radio-immunoassay while insulin sensitivity was calculated from intravenous glucose tolerance tests with frequent blood sampling using MINMOD analysis. Significantly higher basal leptin levels were found in obese compared to non-obese PCOS (31.76 +/- 3.06 vs. 10.42 +/- 2.31 ng/ml; p < 0.05) as well as in obese in comparison to non-obese controls (29.16 +/- 5.06 vs 8.51 +/- 0.88 ng/ml; p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between insulin sensitivity and leptin levels in both obese (r = -0.2480; p > 0.05) and non-obese PCOS groups (r = -0.4620; p > 0.05). In conclusion, high serum leptin, insulin and testosterone levels together with reduced insulin sensitivity were found in obese PCOS women, suggesting that high leptin levels could be a characteristic of the obese PCOS phenotype.

The sequential administration of growth hormone-releasing hormone followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin, as an effective test to assess the pituitary GH reserve in man.

OBJECTIVE: GH deficiency, either in children or in adults, is a clinically relevant problem. The diagnosis is based on dynamic tests of GH secretion, which are clear cut on a group basis but highly problematic for individual diagnosis. The controversy surrounding the diagnosis of GH deficiency reflects the absence of a gold standard dynamic test. The synthetic hexapeptide hexarelin and GHRH stimulate GH secretion using different mechanisms. A sequential test has been devised using the administration of GHRH as first stimulus followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin. The two aims of the study were (a) to evaluate the interaction of GHRH and hexarelin, and (b) to devise a sequential test of GH reserve. DESIGN: The GH stimuli used were GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) as a pituitary stimulus, and hexarelin (1 microgram/kg i.v.) as a GH stimulus whose main action is hypothalamic. Each subject was tested twice in order to serve as his own control. Three different studies, each with two duplicate tests, were performed on separate groups of individuals: (a) GHRH followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin and on the second day hexarelin followed 120 minutes later by GHRH; (b) GHRH followed 120 minutes later by GHRH and on the other day hexarelin followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin; (c) GH 0.5 IU i.v. followed 120 minutes later by GHRH and on the other day, the same dose of GH followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin. PATIENTS: Eighteen normal volunteers (12 women, 6 men) after giving informed consent. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma GH levels were measured by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay; each value shown is the mean +/- SEM of n = 6. RESULTS: GHRH followed 120 minutes later by hexarelin induced two episodes of GH secretion (expressed as mean GH peak, mU/l). The GHRH-mediated GH release showed a mean GH peak of 38.2 +/- 13.6 mU/l and after hexarelin 120 minutes later of 56.7 +/- 18.0 mU/l. The contrary sequence blocked the second stimulus, i.e. the hexarelin-stimulated GH mean peak was 54.7 +/- 18.4, and the GH release 120 minutes later after GHRH was 4.8 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.05 vs GHRH used as first stimulus). In the two sequential tests using the same stimulus, the second GH peak was reduced. In fact, GHRH induced a GH mean peak of 63.8 +/- 21.1 mU/l as first stimulus, greater (P < 0.05) than when GHRH was administered again 120 minutes later (22.0 +/- 5.9 mU/l). Similar results were obtained with hexarelin, with a first mean peak of 70.6 +/- 10.3 mU/l, and a second one 120 minutes later of 13.4 +/- 4.6 mU/l (P < 0.05). The blockade of the second stimulus was not due to the feed-back action of the GH released by the first stimulus. In fact, the i.v. administration of exogenous GH induced a mean GH peak of 168.0 +/- 89.7 and reduced the action of GHRH administered 120 minutes later (26.1 +/- 8.1). The previous administration of GH (mean peak 115.5 +/- 42.0) did not alter the action of hexarelin injected 120 minutes later, showing a mean peak of 71.9 +/- 11.2. The large variability in the stimulatory action of GHRH contrasted vividly with the reproducibility of hexarelin. Furthermore, individually analysed, only one of the 12 subjects tested first with hexarelin, compared to 4 out of 12 tested with GHRH as first stimulus, presented a blunted response (< 13 mU/l). After the sequential stimulus there were no false negatives. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GHRH in normal subjects and of hexarelin 120 minutes later provides separate information regarding pituitary GH reserve, of both secretagogues without mutual interference. There were not false negative results to the combined test. This sequentially delayed test may be of some value in the clinical setting for assessing pituitary GH reserve.

Growth hormone response to GHRH, GHRP-6 and GHRH + GHRP-6 in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improved diagnostic facilities and advanced in vitro studies, the primary causes of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have not been resolved. A defect in the regulation of GH secretion has been suggested in PCOS but the available data are limited and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In recent years considerable attention has been devoted to non-classic GH secretagogues and, in particular, to the series of hexapeptides of which GH-releasing peptide (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2, known as GHRP-6) is the most representative. GHRP-6 seems to be a promising tool for exploring GH secretory mechanisms and it has been reported that GHRH + GHRP-6 is a powerful stimulus to GH secretion. Our aim was to investigate the GH responses to GHRH, GHRP-6 and the administration of GHRP + GHRP-6 in two groups of patients (normal weight and obese) with PCOS in comparison with matched control groups. DESIGN: All subjects were studied three times on different days with GHRH (100 micrograms i.v.), GHRP-6 (90 micrograms i.v.) and GHRH + GHRP-6 (100 micrograms + 90 micrograms). PATIENTS: Sixteen women with PCOS and 22 healthy controls were studied. They were divided into four groups according to BMI: Group A (non-obese PCOS, n = 6, age 21.8 +/- 1.7 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2); Group B: (obese PCOS, n = 10, age 21.7 +/- 1.3 years, BMI 32.9 +/- 2.1 kg/m2); Group C (non-obese healthy women, n = 13, age 26.8 +/- 1.5 years, BMI 21.8 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and Group D (obese healthy women, n = 9, age 29.4 +/- 4.2 years, BMI 35.7 +/- 1.3 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH was measured using a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (Delphia, Pharmacia). RESULTS: After GHRH administration significant differences were found between GH peaks in Groups A and B (82.4 +/- 16.4 vs 20 +/- 4.9 mU/l, P < 0.05) and in AUC for GH between Groups A and B (4667 +/- 1061 vs 947 +/- 236, P < 0.05) while there were no differences between the same groups in GH peak or AUC after GHRP-6 administration. There were no significant differences in peaks or AUC for GH after GHRH between Groups A and C, nor between Groups B and D. There were significant differences in GH peaks after combined administration of GHRH + GHRP-6 between Groups A and B (211 +/- 26.4 vs 108 +/- 17.6, P < 0.05) as well as between GH AUC in Groups A and B (12068 +/- 2323 vs 5997 +/- 1342, P < 0.05). There were no differences in GH peaks or AUC for GH after GHRH + GHRP-6 administration between Groups A and C or Groups B and D. CONCLUSIONS: The impaired GH response to GHRH found in obese PCOS patients is a consequence of obesity and could be a functional defect, since it can be overridden with GHRP-6 administration.

Short-term high dose steroid therapy does not affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. Clinical assessment by the insulin tolerance test.

Ten patients in acute exacerbation of multiple sclerosis were treated with 1000 mg of methylprednisolone for 7 days, followed by abrupt cessation of therapy. The function of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was assessed by the response of ACTH and cortisol to insulin tolerance test (ITT). ITT was performed 1 day before and 1, 3, 8, 13 and 23 days after the termination of the therapy (days 0, 8, 10, 15, 20 and 30 of the study, respectively). The response of these hormones to insulin-induced hypoglycemia prior to therapy was normal. There was no suppression of the ACTH response to hypoglycemia after the methylprednisolone therapy based on the 100% rise of ACTH after ITT. Cortisol response during ITT was suppressed at day 8 (1 day after ending of therapy) but recovered on day 10 (3 days after ending of therapy). In conclusion, 7 day-therapy with 1000 mg methylprednisolone does not result in the permanent suppression of the HPA axis, suggesting that no regular supplemental corticosteroid coverage is required. The observed transitory suppression of the HPA axis recovered spontaneously after the therapy.

Growth hormone secretion after the administration of GHRP-6 or GHRH combined with GHRP-6 does not decline in late adulthood.

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone (GH) secretion in middle and late adulthood declines with age. However, the precise mechanisms causing this impairment in GH release are unknown. His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2 (GHRP-6) is a synthetic compound that releases GH in a dose related and specific manner in several species, including man. In order to gain a further insight into disrupted GH secretion in late adulthood, we evaluated GH responses to GHRP-6 or GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, in healthy young and late adulthood groups of subjects. DESIGN: All subjects underwent three different tests carried out in random order and separated by at least one week. Tests were performed at 0900 h after an overnight fast. GHRH (100 micrograms), GHRP-6 (90 micrograms) either alone or in combination were administered as an i.v. bolus. SUBJECTS: Groups of healthy young (mean +/- SEM 22 +/- 1.1 years, n = 9) and older adult subjects (59.5 +/- 1.7 years, n = 9) were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: In the group of young adult subjects the combined administration of GHRH and GHRP-6 elicited a greater GH increase than GHRH alone (F = 21.9, P < 0.001) or GHRP-6 alone (F = 6.2, P = 0.01). Similarly, the response to the combined stimuli was also greater than with GHRH alone (F = 21.8, P < 0.001) or GHRP-6 alone (F = 23.9, P < 0.001) in the late adulthood group of subjects. GH responses to GHRH were greater in younger than in older subjects (F = 3.45, P = 0.03). In contrast, GH responses to either GHRP-6 (F = 0.71, P = NS) or combined GHRH plus GHRP-6 administration (F = 0.68, P = NS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that GH responses to GHRP-6 are much greater than to GHRH in late adulthood. The marked increase of plasma GH levels observed after administration of GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH indicates that impaired GH secretion in late adulthood is a functional and potentially reversible state.

Immunological resistance to human biosynthetic insulin--effects of immunosuppression and plasmapheresis.

A 55-year-old gentleman, after being treated for a short time with a diet and with Chlorpropamide, was switched to purified porcine insulin due to ketonuria and ketoacidosis. After a year the patient developed immunological insulin resistance (mean daily insulin dose: 3.72 U/kg body weight; anti-insulin antibodies 78%). In order to lower anti-insulin antibodies human recombinant DNA insulin was introduced into further therapy. Contrary to expectations, the patient did not reduce whatsoever his anti-insulin antibodies and his daily insulin dose increased up to 5.63 U/kg body weight. Introduction of combined immunosuppressive therapy (prednisone plus azathioprine) together with plasmapheresis resulted in rapid lowering of daily insulin requirement and reduction in anti-insulin antibodies. Immunosuppressive therapy was continued with 10 mg of prednisone and a year later the patients insulin daily requirement was 0.66 U/kg BW while his antibodies were 18%. The possible causes of insulin resistance to human recombinant DNA insulin are discussed as well as the advantage of combined immunosuppressive therapy together with plasmapheresis that was used for rapid lowering of insulin daily requirement and anti-insulin antibodies titer.

[Insulin resistance: pathophysiologic mechanisms, methods of assessment and clinical implications]. / Insulinska rezistencija: patofizioloski mehanizmi, metode za procenu i klinicke implikacije.

In the past years remarkable increase in knowledge of the mechanisms of insulin resistance has been made. Interest for the insulin resistance has been heightened by it's prevalence, and by the fact that it has a key role in pathogenesis of obesity, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, polycystic ovary disease. In this review we discuss current concepts of the mechanisms of insulin resistance, methods for the assessment as well as its implications for a variety of disorders in human beings.