Correlation of Engraftment and Time from Melphalan Administration to Stem Cell Infusion.

Single-agent, high-dose melphalan continues to be the most commonly used conditioning regimen for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. The timing of melphalan administration with respect to stem cell infusion has not been clearly defined. Many institutions require a minimum of 24 hours between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion; however, some institutions have adopted shorter intervals based on melphalan's short half-life. Some studies have suggested that shortening the interval between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion may contribute to delays in engraftment, but this correlation has not been clearly evaluated or defined. This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients who received stem cells at least 24 hours after melphalan (≥24 hours cohort) compared with those who received stem cells within 24 hours of melphalan (<24 hours cohort. The study included a total of 723 adult patients, 502 patients in the ≥24 hours cohort and 221 in the <24 hours cohort, treated at 3 transplantation centers between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2019. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. The Fisher exact test was used to compare nominal categorical variables between the 2 cohorts, and the nonparametric van der Waerden test or Mood median test was used to compare ordinal or continuous variables. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days for both the ≥24 hours cohort (interquartile range [IQR], 11 to 12 days) and the <24 hours cohort (IQR, 11 to 13 days) (P = .07). The median time to platelet engraftment was 19 days for both the ≥24 hours cohort (IQR, 17 to 22 days) and <24 hours cohort (IQR, 17 to 20 days) (P = .25). The median time between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion in the <24 hours cohort was 18 hours, with a minimum time of 12 hours. The existing literature has not clearly defined the impact of the timing between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion on engraftment in autologous transplantation. The ability to safely shorten the interval between chemotherapy and transplantation could increase logistical flexibility and/or decrease the length of hospital stay. This large multicenter retrospective study did not identify a statistical or clinical impact on engraftment when melphalan was infused <24 hours or ≥24 hours before autologous stem cell infusion.

Efficacy of a conversion from filgrastim to filgrastim-sndz in stem cell transplant patients undergoing mobilization.

During autologous stem cell transplant, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) serve the integral role of mobilizing hematopoietic cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection by leukapheresis. Filgrastim (Neupogen®) is a G-CSF and affects hematopoietic cells by stimulating growth and differentiation of neutrophils. Filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio®), a biosimilar of filgrastim, received landmark approval as the first biosimilar product approved by the FDA in the United States. As a result of the recent FDA approval, our medical center made the conversion in August 2016 from using filgrastim to filgrastim-sndz to provide patients the same benefits of the filgrastim injection at a reduced cost. This retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated the comparative efficacy of the filgrastim-sndz biosimilar in 147 patients who underwent mobilization prior to stem cell transplant with filgrastim between 1 August 2015 and 31 July 2016 or filgrastim-sndz between 1 September 2016 and 30 November 2017. The mean number of CD34 cells collected during apheresis was 7.38 × 106 in the filgrastim group and 8.86 × 106 in the filgrastim-sndz group. Filgrastim-sndz was significantly non-inferior, as the difference between filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz was -1.48 × 106 with an upper 95% confidence bound equal to -0.24 × 106 that did not include the non-inferiority margin of 1 × 106 (p = 0.0006). The median number of days of apheresis was 2 in both groups (p= 0.3273). In conclusion, the biosimilar product was non-inferior for mobilization and the conversion from filgrastim to filgrastim-sndz afforded patients similar efficacy for mobilization in stem cell transplant at a reduced cost.

A clinical pharmacy pilot within a Precision Medicine Program for cancer patients and review of related pharmacist clinical practice.

PURPOSE: The implementation, benefits, and challenges of clinical pharmacist services within a Precision Medicine Program for cancer patients are described. By relating the practice model that was developed, this report may further encourage pharmacists at cancer centers nationally to be involved and lead precision-based care in the oncology setting. SUMMARY: A clinical pharmacist was integrated into a Precision Medicine Program for oncology patients using somatic testing to identify actionable mutations and apply targeted therapy to malignancies. This pharmacist served as a drug resource for the program's molecular tumor board and oncologists seeking precision-based oncologic strategies. The pharmacist was a facilitator of drug assistance and dispensing in collaboration with the specialty pharmacy and provided care to 14 oncology patients receiving precision-based therapies. The clinical pharmacist was readily accepted as an addition to the team by both oncologists and patients and the experience served as an important learning opportunity. CONCLUSION: The success of integrating this precision medicine pharmacist into a newly formed Precision Medicine Program and the model it can serve as may be considered for other cancer centers that may or may not have easily accessible pharmacogenomic experts and resources. This service highlights the importance of pharmacist care in such a program and the various opportunities for integration. Oncology clinical pharmacists should seek to integrate into Precision Medicine Programs and systems directing this care and develop their knowledge and understanding of genomics to continue providing the highest level of cancer care as a pivotal member of the cancer care team.

The Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Pharmacist: Roles, Responsibilities, and Recommendations from the ASBMT Pharmacy Special Interest Group.

Pharmacists are increasingly recognized as an essential member of the multidisciplinary team for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. However, until recently, their educational background, required training, and potential roles have not been well described. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide supporting evidence for the HCT Clinical Pharmacist Role Description, which has been endorsed by several organizations including the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. This document provides justification for the various roles pharmacists fulfill with respect to medication management, transitions of care, patient and provider education, policy development, quality improvement, and research. Furthermore, evidence supporting the value, financially and otherwise, HCT pharmacists provide is reviewed. Pharmacists in the HCT setting are encouraged to report on novel practice models and potential impact of their services to increase awareness and utilization of HCT pharmacists.

Extended infusion compared to standard infusion cefepime as empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Background Extended infusion (EI) dosing provides a longer time above the minimum inhibitory concentration, which is important for the clinical success of ß-lactam antibiotics, especially for patients with impaired immunity. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and clinical impact of administering cefepime by EI as treatment of febrile neutropenia. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study. All patients received cefepime 2 g IV every 8 h, with the first dose administered using a 30-min infusion. After the first dose, patients were randomized to receive cefepime over 30 min as a standard infusion (SI) or 3 h (EI). Patients were >18 years old with febrile neutropenia (neutrophil count <500 cells/mm3 and temperature >38.0ºC) and received chemotherapy or stem cell transplant as treatment for malignancy. Patients were excluded for the following: allergy to a cephalosporin, creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min, receipt of concurrent Gram-negative antimicrobial, sepsis, or solid tumor malignancy. The primary outcome was defervescence by 72 h. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, clinical success, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and need for additional antimicrobials. Main results Sixty-three patients were enrolled: 33 in the SI arm and 30 in the EI arm. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, weight, estimated creatinine clearance, and duration of neutropenia. None of the patients in the EI arm withdrew due to practical complications of receiving EI cefepime. Twenty-three patients in the SI arm and 20 patients in the EI arm defervesced by 72 h ( p = 0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcome measures; however, patients in the EI arm appeared to have defervesced more rapidly (median 19 vs. 41 h, p = 0.305). Conclusion Administration of cefepime by EI for the treatment of febrile neutropenia is feasible. Larger clinical trials are necessary to determine if EI cefepime imparts a clinical benefit in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Hyperglycemia during first-line R-CHOP or dose adjusted R-EPOCH chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma is prevalent and associated with chemotherapy alteration - a retrospective study.

High-dose glucocorticoids such as prednisone are combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in the R-CHOP or dose adjusted R-EPOCH regimens used for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In this retrospective study, our primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of hyperglycemia during first-line R-CHOP or DA-EPOCH-R. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the incidence of chemotherapy alteration and overall survival in those with and without hyperglycemia. One hundred and sixty patients were eligible. We found that 47% of all patients had at least one hyperglycemic episode and hyperglycemia was associated with chemotherapy alteration (p = .028). Multivariate analysis revealed international prognostic index (IPI) ≥ 3 (p = .045) and chemotherapy alteration (p = .001) were associated with decreased overall survival. We conclude that hyperglycemia is common during first-line NHL treatment with R-CHOP or DA-EPOCH-R, even in the absence of known diabetes and is associated with alterations of chemotherapy. Baseline pre-PET scan fasting blood glucose of 100 mg/dL or higher may predict hyperglycemia during therapy.

Dose-Adjusted Etoposide, Prednisone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin (EPOCH) With or Without Rituximab as First-Line Therapy for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH) was developed in an effort to overcome inadequate drug concentrations and compensate for increased drug clearance. The goal of the present study was to examine the risk factors and outcomes of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) treated with DA-EPOCH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the data from 136 patients with previously untreated aNHL who received infusional DA-EPOCH chemotherapy with or without rituximab from 2005 to 2013. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with death, progression, or relapse at 2 years. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 82%. The relapse-free survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 68%, 63%, and 52% with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.59% to 0.85%, 0.54% to 0.70%, and 0.31% to 0.70%, respectively. Patients with T-cell aNHL had an increased risk of death, progression, or relapse (Odds Ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-8.8) compared with those with B-cell aNHL. In multivariate analysis, current smoking, disease in the bone marrow, and the number of cycles completed were independent predictors of death and relapse. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that EPOCH with or without rituximab is active in both B- and T-cell aNHL. Toxicity did not significantly affect timing of treatment delivery or treatment outcomes. Dose adjustment by hematopoietic nadir similarly had no effect. The effect of smoking during chemotherapy should be evaluated further.

Ibrutinib and rituximab induced rapid response in refractory Richter syndrome.

We report a 53-year-old man diagnosed with Richter syndrome. He was heavily pretreated and was refractory to prior therapy. He received rituximab and ibrutinib, and achieved a significant response after 1 month of therapy. Our case illustrates the importance of investigation of rituximab and ibrutinib in Richter's syndrome.

The prognostic importance of polypharmacy in older adults treated for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML).

We retrospectively evaluated the prognostic significance of polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use among 150 patients >60 years of age receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). After adjustment for age and comorbidity, increased number of medications at diagnosis (≥ 4 versus ≤ 1) was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR=9.98, 95% CI=1.18-84.13), lower odds of complete remission status (OR=0.20, 95% CI=0.06-0.65), and higher overall mortality (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.15-3.92). Inappropriate medication use (classified according to Beers criteria) was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Polypharmacy warrants further study as a modifiable marker of vulnerability among older adults with AML.

Emerging role of rasburicase in the management of increased plasma uric acid levels in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is defined as a group of metabolic derangements that result from the massive and abrupt release of cellular components into the bloodstream after rapid lysis of tumor cells. Breakdown of released materials leads to a number of electrolyte abnormalities, including elevated uric acid concentrations in the blood (hyperuricemia), which carries potentially serious consequences. The diagnosis, prevention, and management of TLS is complicated by variability in definitions, differences in risk factors based on patient- and tumor-specific characteristics, and practitioner preferences in terms of pharmaceutical management strategies. The best prevention and management option for a particular patient depends on the patient's baseline risk for TLS development, the severity of symptoms in the event of TLS development, practical management considerations, and financial implications of treatment.

Rasburicase for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia in tumor lysis syndrome.

PURPOSE: To review current knowledge about tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), a set of metabolic imbalances, including hyperuricemia, that often occur during chemotherapeutic or biotherapeutic treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies. DATA SOURCE: English language journal articles indexed in PubMed. STUDY SELECTION: Recent reviews and original research articles related to TLS, hyperuricemia, and treatment of hyperuricemia were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: The incidence of TLS depends highly on the type of malignancy, its growth characteristics, and the total tumor burden. Patients are at heightened risk if they have hyperuricemia, hypovolemia, or poor renal function before anticancer therapy begins. Recently published guidelines make risk assessment and patient staging more systematic. Prophylactic measures should be used to reduce the risk for TLS in vulnerable patients. Such measures include hydration to facilitate urinary excretion and administration of allopurinol to prevent de novo production of uric acid. If hyperuricemia occurs despite preventative efforts, uric acid concentrations can be reduced with rasburicase, a recombinant, intravenously administered urate oxidase. The cost of rasburicase therapy is substantial but is considerably less than that of hemodialysis and extended hospitalization. Shorter courses or smaller doses of rasburicase than those recommended may be effective in reducing hyperuricemia in some patients, but it is important to recognize that the alternative dosing still awaits validation. CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol and rasburicase are recommended for preventing hyperuricemia in patients at intermediate or high risk for TLS, respectively. If hyperuricemia develops despite preventative measures, rasburicase treatment is an effective method for lowering uric acid concentrations within normal limits.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine pretransfusion medication versus placebo for the prevention of transfusion reactions.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen and diphenhydramine are commonly used as pretransfusion medications to prevent transfusion reactions. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the risk of transfusion reactions in hematology/oncology patients who receive acetaminophen with diphenhydramine or placebo before transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled transfusion reaction study of 315 eligible patients was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 65 years admitted to the leukemia or bone marrow transplant (BMT) services. Patients were excluded if they had a known allergy to either acetaminophen or diphenhydramine or had a documented history of a febrile or allergic transfusion reaction. All blood products were administered using a leukofilter. Study medications were given 30 minutes before transfusions and no other acetaminophen or diphenhydramine was given within 4 hours of administration of the study medications. Patients were monitored for the development of reaction symptoms within 4 hours after the transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 154 active drug patients were compared to 161 placebo patients. There was no significant difference in the overall risk of transfusion reactions between the two groups. However, analysis of specific reaction types revealed a significant decrease in the risk of febrile reactions when pretransfusion medication is used in addition to bedside leukoreduction. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransfusion medication of leukemia or BMT patients without a history of transfusion reaction does not decrease the overall risk of transfusion reactions. However, pretransfusion medication may decrease the risk of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions to leukoreduced blood products.