[A case of biliary panperitonitis due to intrahepatic bile duct rupture with intrahepatic bile duct tumor].

An 87-year-old man visited his previous doctor because of jaundice, abdominal pain, and disturbance of consciousness. He was diagnosed with cholangitis and panperitonitis and was referred to our hospital. Emergency laparotomy revealed biliary peritonitis. However, the bile leak point was unclear. Two days after surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed and revealed hilar bile duct stenosis, slight dilation of the intrahepatic bile duct, and bile leakage from the peripheral left intrahepatic bile duct to the abdominal free space. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was performed, and bile leakage decreased. He was discharged from our hospital with improvement from jaundice and peritonitis. Intrahepatic bile duct rupture with neoplastic obstruction of the bile duct is extremely rare. To date, only two cases of intrahepatic bile duct rupture with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have been published.

[Effect of adding X-ray examination to endoscopy in the assessment of the invasion depth of early gastric cancer].

In the assessment of invasion depth of early gastric cancer (EGC), the effect of adding X-ray examination to endoscopy was retrospectively investigated in 84 EGC lesions diagnosed at our hospital, including 62 differentiated and 22 undifferentiated lesions. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 75% with endoscopy and 82.1% when X-ray examination was performed in addition to endoscopy. This demonstrated an increase in the accuracy of 7.1% by adding X-ray examination. In terms of presence of ulceration, the additional effect of X-ray examination was higher for lesions without ulceration for both differentiated and undifferentiated lesions. In terms of tumor diameter, the additional effect of X-ray examination was higher for differentiated lesions of ≤30mm and for undifferentiated lesions of ≥21mm. In terms of tumor location, the additional effect of X-ray examination was higher for lesions located in the upper gastric corpus. Depending on the lesion, the addition of X-ray examination to endoscopy contributed to an increase in the accuracy of the assessment of the invasion depth of EGC.

[Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma of the Fundic Gland Type].

Case 1: A 66-year-old man underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD), which showed a slightly elevated lesion at the greater curvature of the cardia. We diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma(tub1, 2)as a result of the biopsy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)was performed. The pathological examination revealed a gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic type(GA-FG), with a tumor depth of SM2. Consequently, laparoscopic gastrectomy was additionally performed. Case 2: A 65-year-old woman underwent EGD, which revealed a slightly elevated lesion at the posterior wall of the upper body. We made a diagnosis of GA-FG as on the basis of biopsy resuit. ESD was performed. A pathological examination revealed that the tumor depth was SM2. Consequently, laparoscopic gastrectomy was additionally performed. GA-FG rarely demonstrates metastasis and recurrence. Most cases undergo ESD, few reports of surgical resection exist. We report our experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy for GA-FG.

[A Case of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor(GIST)Treated with Imatinib Mesylate Neoadjuvant Therapy to Preserve the Anus].

A woman in her 40's who initially presented with anal pain was diagnosed with rectal GIST. A 9 cm tumor extended to near the anus, and curative abdominoperineal tumor resection was required. The patient initially received neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib mesylate. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months reduced the tumor to approximately 47% of its original size and permitted anus-preserving surgery. The present case suggests that neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib mesylate is useful for large rectal GISTs, from the standpoint of anal function preservation.

[The Clinical Effect of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer in Our Hospital].

Ramucirumab(RAM)was approved for unresectable advanced gastric cancer in March 2015. Recent Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines recommended RAM plus paclitaxel(PTX)and RAM alone in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer who had been previously treated with chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RAM alone and PTX plus RAM in these patients. Patients who were administered RAM or PTX plus RAM between March 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. We compared the clinical outcome of RAM alone(RAM group, n=11)with that of PTX plus RAM(PTX plus RAM group, n=10). The RAM group contained more patients with poor performance status than the PTX plus RAM group. More cases of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were found in the PTX plus RAM group than in the RAM group. The response rate was 9% in the RAM group and 30% in the PTX plus RAM group. The progression-free survival was 2 months in the RAM group and 3.75 months in the PTX plus RAM group. The overall survival was not reached in the RAM and PTX plus RAM groups. We considered that RAM and PTX plus RAM are safe and effective therapies for advanced gastric cancer patients.

[A Case of Advanced Colon Cancer with Long-Term and Re-Administration of Regorafenib].

A 54-year-old woman diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and multiple liver metastases underwent sigmoidectomy, partial hepatectomy, and RFA in September 2009. Because of postoperative liver and lung recurrence, 5 regimens with combinations of L-OHP/CPT-11 plus anti-VEGF antibody/anti-EGFR antibody was performed. Following these treatments, she underwent hepatic arterial infusion therapy with UFT/Krestin for progressive liver metastases. Starting in November 2014, regorafenib was administered, with an immediate decrease in tumor marker levels; tumor reduction demonstrated enhanced effect against liver metastases. After 8 months of administration, we stopped regorafenib and changed to TAS-102 due to diarrhea and eating disorders. However, TAS-102 was not effective; there were significant increases in tumor markers, liver function tests, and tumor size on computed tomography, and worsening of abdominal pain. After re-administration of regorafenib, a rapid decrease in tumor marker levels and improvement of liver dysfunction and abdominal pain were observed. Re-administration continued for 8 months until best supportive care was instituted. In cases with observed therapeutic effect of regorafenib, long-term or re-administration is possible, with extension of the prognosis depending on the adjustment, and without size reduction of metastatic tumors.

[Analysis of Oxaliplatin Combination Therapy for Unresectable or Recurrent Gastric Cancer].

We analyzed 26 cases of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer treated with oxaliplatin(OX)combination therapy between September 2014 and January 2016. The number of unresectable gastric cancer cases was 14 and there were 12 recurrent cases. The number of patients receiving S-1 plus OX(SOX), SOX plus trastuzumab(Tmab), capecitabine(Cape)plus OX(CapeOX), and CapeOX plus Tmab was 17, 1, 6, and 2, respectively. The starting dose of OX was 130mg/m2 in 12 patients and 100mg/m2 in 14. The median follow-up duration from the first treatment was 6 months(1-14). The median number of treatment cycles was 5(1-19). Dose reductions occurred in 14 cases, and treatment delay occurred in 13 cases. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 2 cases(8%); thrombocytopenia and stomatitis occurred in 1 case. The response rate was 23%, the disease control rate was 69%, and the median relapse-free survival time was 4 months(1-14). OX combination therapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer was feasible in terms of safety and might be effective for disease control.

[A case of advanced pancreatic cancer responding well to S-1/gemcitabine combination therapy after gemcitabine therapy].

A 71-year-old male with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine (GEM) by another doctor came to our hospital because of stenosis of duodenum and hydronephrosis. There was peritoneal dissemination in his abdominal cavity, and gastro-jejunostomy was performed. After surgery, GEM therapy was continued until he was judged as PD. The regimen was switched to S-1/GEM combination therapy. After that, the tumor marker was down to within normal range, and abdominal symptoms improved. He is now being treated as an outpatient. S-1/GEM combination therapy is effective for patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.

[A case in which intra-arterial chemotherapy for simultaneous hepatic metastases markedly improved AFP-producing gastric cancer].

The prognosis of most hepatic and lymph node metastases in AFP-producing gastric cancer is poor, and despite the use of multimodal therapy, the average survival period is reported to be approximately one year. Described here is one example in which intra-arterial chemotherapy for simultaneous hepatic metastases in AFP-producing gastric cancer achieved a marked improvement. The patient is a 65-year-old female. Distal gastrectomy was performed for Type II gastric cancer. L, type 2, 5.5x2.4 cm, tub 2>por 1, pT2 (MP), int, INF b, ly2, v1, pN1, pPM (-), pDM (-), pH1: stage IV. The AFP level before surgery was 801.4 ng/mL and lowered to 65.8 ng/mL after surgery, AFP-producing gastric cancer and simultaneous hepatic metastases (S4, single lesion) was diagnosed based upon imaging examinations. 5-FU+epirubicin+MMC (FEM)intra-arterial chemotherapy was started one month following surgery, but because CT showed multiple new hepatic lesions(S4, S5)four months following surgery, DSM therapy was performed with hepatic arterial injections of MMC 10 mg, DSM 300 mg. Dynamic CT showed a reduction in size of the tumors in both S4 and S5, and at five months following surgery, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy FP (CDDP 5 mg+5-FU 250 mg weekly) was started and performed 45 times in a 14-month period. During therapy, CR was achieved for the hepatic metastases and tumor marker levels were also normal. Because an introduction of contrast medium into the hepatic reservoir showed a narrowing of the hepatic artery and inflow of contrast medium into the splenic artery, arterial infusion was terminated. Following this, from the 20th month following surgery, S-1 (100 mg/day: 4 weeks administration, 2 weeks rest) was started and from the third course (50 mg/ day: 4 weeks administration, 2 weeks rest), and the patient is currently undergoing a sixth course. Currently, 2 years and 4 months after surgery, there have been no recurrences. This suggests the possibility that intra-arterial chemotherapy is an effective treatment method for hepatic metastases in AFP-producing gastric cancer.

[S-1+gemcitabine (GEM) therapy was effective in a case of unresectable pancreatic head carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: Treatment results of pancreatic head carcinoma are not good and long-term survival, especially in nonresectable cases is extremely difficult to obtain. The case reported here is of nonresectable pancreatic head carcinoma in which S-1+gemcitabine (GEM) proved to be effective. CASE: A 70-year-old male. The patient initially complained of epigastralgia. Jaundice was also noted and upon further study, pancreatic head carcinoma, portal vein and common hepatic artery infiltration along with duodenal infiltration were diagnosed. Gastrojejunostomy and cholecystectomy were performed with a preoperative diagnosis of Phb, TS2 infiltrative type T4, CH (+), DU (+), S (+), RP (-), PV (+), Ach (+), PLX, OO (-), N0, M0, and Stage IVa. Perioperative findings showed no hepatic or peritoneal metastases. Following surgery, S-1+ GEM (S-1 100 mg/day, day 1-14; GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) was administered on day 8 and day 15 for 2 weeks followed by one week of no administration) was started. After completing 2 courses, there was no change in the tumor, but after finishing the sixth course, there was a notable reduction in tumor size, and after finishing the 10th course, a further reduction was noted. Currently at the end of the 14th course, the tumors are unidentifiable upon imaging. At 1 year and 5 months from the initial diagnosis, there has been no recurrence and chemotherapy is being continued. In the case reported here, there have been no adverse side-effects from the S-1+GEM therapy, it is a safe method which does not lower QOL in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma, and we can look forward to the possibility of extended survival times. CONCLUSION: In the case of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma, S-1+GEM therapy may be able to provide an improved long-term prognosis.

[Complete recovery obtained with combined S-1 + CDDP therapy in a patient with multiple lung metastases from esophageal cancer].

PURPOSE: There are numerous reports on the subject of effectiveness in radio-chemotherapy with regard to esophageal cancer, suggesting especially the combination therapy of 5-FU + CDDP aimed for recovery. Treatment becomes difficult when distal metastases appear during an adjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Our report here is a case in which a complete recovery was obtained after changing to S-1, a prodrug of 5-FU, in response to multiple lung metastases which appeared during the combined 5-FU + CDDP therapy followed by surgery for esophageal cancer. CASE: The patient was a 71-year-old male. Endoscopy during a physical examination showed a Type 1 tumor 27-30 cm from the anterior teeth. Detailed tests provided a preoperative diagnosis of esophageal cancer: Ut Type 1, T2-T3, N2, MO, IMO. A right thoracolaparotomic subtotal esophagectomy and retrosternal reconstruction were performed. Pathological findings showed well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, pT1b (sm), pN1 (106-rec R), pStage II. Postoperative combination of 5-FU + CDDP (day 1-5, 5-FU 500 mg; CDDP 10 mg/body) was started. Because of the appearance of multiple lung metastases after the completion of 3 courses, 2 courses of S-1 + CDDP (S-1 120 mg/body day 1-14; CDDP 5 mg/body day 1-5, day 8-12) were performed. After completing the chemotherapy, CT revealed the resolution of the lung metastases and complete recovery was diagnosed. Following this, a treatment with S-1 alone was continued until the appearance of bone metastases at which time radiotherapy was performed. The treatment is currently ongoing and no recurrence of the lung metastases has been shown. CONCLUSION: There have been numerous reports of the combination of S-1 + CDDP in esophageal cancer for NAC or in inoperable cases. However, our report suggests that this method may be effective in cases of recurrence or distal metastases.