2015 UK software audit of hepatobiliary scintigraphy.

INTRODUCTION: This audit investigated hepatobiliary function imaging in UK hospitals, reviewing protocol differences in acquisition and processing parameters and the effect on calculated gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Two dynamic data sets were available: one continuous dynamic data set, and the other with a 5-min break to administer the fatty stimulus. Participants used a set of 12 anonymized patient data sets most similar to their standard protocol calculating GBEF using their routine method. RESULTS: Fifty-two UK centres responded. Across all centres for all data sets, there was large variability in GBEF quoted, mostly owing to variations in the calculation method, motion correction and imaging type/times. The largest contributor to GBEF variation was time acquired after stimulus which varied from 20 to 70 min. Only 48.1% centres acquired for 60 min after stimulus, which is the acquisition time stated in normal range references. Overall, 13.5% participating centres administered fatty stimuli that fell below the recommended 10 g. Widespread variations were found in GBEF normal ranges and fatty stimulus administration. Motion correction has a large effect on GBEF; in one data set, motion correction alone changed GBEF from 44 to 9%, but 25% of the participants stated motion correction was not used. CONCLUSION: The authors proposed gold standard is fat content of the stimulus should be at least 10 g; and images should be acquired for 60 min after stimulus. If GBEF is quoted, motion correction should be used, and if compared with a normal range, the stimulus used must fit with the reference.

UK audit of quantitative thyroid uptake imaging.

AIM: A national audit of quantitative thyroid uptake imaging was conducted by the Nuclear Medicine Software Quality Group of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine in 2014/2015. The aims of the audit were to measure and assess the variability in thyroid uptake results across the UK and to compare local protocols with British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS) guidelines. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Participants were invited through a combination of emails on a public mailbase and targeted invitations from regional co-ordinators. All participants were given a set of images from which to calculate quantitative measures and a spreadsheet for capturing results. The image data consisted of two sets of 10 anterior thyroid images, half of which were acquired after administration of Tc-pertechnetate and the other half after administration of I-iodide. Images of the administration syringes or thyroid phantoms were also included. RESULTS: In total, 54 participants responded to the audit. The median number of scans conducted per year was 50. A majority of centres had at least one noncompliance in comparison with BNMS guidelines. Of most concern was the widespread lack of injection-site imaging. Quantitative results showed that both intersite and intrasite variability were low for the Tc dataset. The coefficient of quartile deviation was between 0.03 and 0.13 for measurements of overall percentage uptake. Although the number of returns for the I dataset was smaller, the level of variability between participants was greater (the coefficient of quartile deviation was between 0.17 and 0.25). CONCLUSION: A UK-wide audit showed that thyroid uptake imaging is still a common test in the UK. It was found that most centres do not adhere to all aspects of the BNMS practice guidelines but that quantitative results are reasonably consistent for Tc-based scans.

UK audit of glomerular filtration rate measurement from plasma sampling in 2013.

INTRODUCTION: An audit was carried out into UK glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculation. The results were compared with an identical 2001 audit. METHODS: Participants used their routine method to calculate GFR for 20 data sets (four plasma samples) in millilitres per minute and also the GFR normalized for body surface area. Some unsound data sets were included to analyse the applied quality control (QC) methods. Variability between centres was assessed for each data set, compared with the national median and a reference value calculated using the method recommended in the British Nuclear Medicine Society guidelines. The influence of the number of samples on variability was studied. Supplementary data were requested on workload and methodology. RESULTS: The 59 returns showed widespread standardization. The applied early exponential clearance correction was the main contributor to the observed variability. These corrections were applied by 97% of centres (50% - 2001) with 80% using the recommended averaged Brochner-Mortenson correction. Approximately 75% applied the recommended Haycock body surface area formula for adults (78% for children). The effect of the number of samples used was not significant. There was wide variability in the applied QC techniques, especially in terms of the use of the volume of distribution. CONCLUSION: The widespread adoption of the guidelines has harmonized national GFR calculation compared with the previous audit. Further standardization could further reduce variability. This audit has highlighted the need to address the national standardization of QC methods. Radionuclide techniques are confirmed as the preferred method for GFR measurement when an unequivocal result is required.

An audit of half-count myocardial perfusion imaging using resolution recovery software.

INTRODUCTION: The Nuclear Medicine Software Quality Group of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine has conducted a multicentre, multivendor audit to evaluate the use of resolution recovery software from several manufacturers when applied to myocardial perfusion data with half the normal counts acquired under a variety of clinical protocols in a range of departments. The objective was to determine whether centres could obtain clinical results with half-count data processed with resolution recovery software that were equivalent to those obtained using their normal protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen centres selected 50 routine myocardial perfusion studies each, from which the Nuclear Medicine Software Quality Group generated simulated half-count studies using Poisson resampling. These half-count studies were reconstructed using resolution recovery and the clinical reports compared with the original reports from the full-count data. A total of 769 patient studies were processed and compared. RESULTS: Eight centres found only a small number of clinically relevant discrepancies between the two reports, whereas eight had an unacceptably high number of discrepancies. There were no significant differences in acquisition parameters between the two groups, although centres finding a high number of discrepancies were more likely to perform both rest and stress scans on normal studies. CONCLUSION: Half of the participating centres could potentially make use of resolution recovery to reduce the administered activity for myocardial perfusion scans without changing their routine acquisition protocols. The other half could consider adjusting the reconstruction parameters used with their resolution recovery software if they wish to use reduced activity successfully.

UK audit of quantification of left-ventricular function using gated myocardial perfusion imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate UK-wide interinstitutional reproducibility of left-ventricular functional parameters, end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction, obtained from gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) studies using technetium-99m-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. The study was carried out by the UK Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Nuclear Medicine Software Quality Group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten anonymized clinical GMPI studies, five with normal perfusion and five with perfusion defects, were made available in DICOM and proprietary formats for download and through manufacturers' representatives. Two of the studies were duplicated in order to assess intraoperator repeatability, giving a total of 12 studies. Studies were made available in 8 and 16 frames/cycle. RESULTS: A total of 58 institutions across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland participated in this study using six different computer packages. Studies were processed at centres using their normal clinical computers and software. The overall mean±SD ejection fraction for all centres was 58.5±3%; the mean end-diastolic volume was 114±12 ml and the mean end-systolic volume was 54±6 ml. The results were affected by the number of frames per cycle and by the postprocessing computer package, but not by the reconstruction filter in the filtered back-projection. CONCLUSION: Calculation of functional parameters from GMPI using technetium-99m-labelled radiopharmaceuticals is reliable and shows limited variability across the UK.

An audit of manufacturers' implementation of reconstruction filters in single-photon emission computed tomography.

AIM: The Nuclear Medicine Software Quality Group of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine has conducted an audit to compare the ways in which different manufacturers implement the filters used in single-photon emission computed tomography. The aim of the audit was to identify differences between manufacturers' implementations of the same filter and to find means for converting parameters between systems. METHODS: Computer-generated data representing projection images of an ideal test object were processed using seven different commercial nuclear medicine systems. Images were reconstructed using filtered back projection and a Butter worth filter with three different cutoff frequencies and three different orders. RESULTS: The audit found large variations between the frequency-response curves of what were ostensibly the same filters on different systems. The differences were greater than could be explained simply by different Butter worth formulae. Measured cutoff frequencies varied between 40 and 180% of that expected. There was also occasional confusion with respect to frequency units. CONCLUSION: The audit concluded that the practical implementation of filtering, such as the size of the kernel, has a profound effect on the results, producing large differences between systems. Nevertheless, this work shows how users can quantify the frequency response of their own systems so that it will be possible to compare two systems in order to find filter parameters on each that produce equivalent results. These findings will also make it easier for users to replicate filters similar to other published results, even if they are using a different computer system.