Ambient temperature and solar insolation are associated with decreased prevalence of SSRI-treated psychiatric disorders.

Serotonergic function is known to fluctuate in association with light and temperature. Serotonin-related behaviors and disorders similarly vary with climatic exposure, but the associations are complex. This complexity may reflect the importance of dose and timing of exposure, as well as acclimation. This cross-sectional study tests how average climate exposures (ambient temperature and solar insolation) vary with the prevalence of a group of SSRI-treated disorders. For comparison, we similarly studied a group of disorders not treated by SSRIs (i.e substance use disorders). Psychiatric prevalence data were obtained from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES). Average yearly solar insolation was obtained from NASA's NLDAS-2 Forcing Dataset Information. Average yearly temperature was obtained from NOAA's US Climate Normals. Logistic regression models were generated to assess the relationship between these two climatic factors and the prevalence of SSRI-treated and substance use disorders. Age, gender, race, income, and education were included in the models to control for possible confounding. Temperature and insolation were significantly associated with the SSRI-responsive group. For an average 1 GJ/m2/year increase, OR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.96, p = 0.001), and for an average 10 °F increase, OR was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.97, p = 0.001). This relationship was not seen with substance use disorders (insolation OR: 0.97, p = 0.682; temperature OR: 0.96, p = 0.481). These results warrant further investigation, but they support the hypothesis that chronic exposure to increased temperature and light positively impact serotonin function, and are associated with reduced prevalence of some psychiatric disorders. They also support further investigation of light and hyperthermia treatments.

Identifying environmental health priorities in underserved populations: a study of rural versus urban communities.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding and effectively addressing persistent health disparities in minority communities requires a clear picture of members' concerns and priorities. This study was intended to engage residents in urban and rural communities in order to identify environmental health priorities. Specific emphasis was placed on how the communities: defined the term environment; their perceptions of environmental exposures as affecting their health; specific priorities in their communities; and differences in urban versus rural populations. STUDY DESIGN: A community-engaged approach was used to develop and implement focus groups and compare environmental health priorities in urban versus rural communities. METHODS: A total of eight focus groups were conducted: four in rural and four in urban communities. Topics included: defining the term environment; how the environment may affect health; and environmental priorities within their communities, using both open discussion and a predefined list. Data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to identify patterns and trends. RESULTS: There were important areas of overlap in priorities between urban and rural communities; both emphasized the importance of the social environment and shared a concern over air pollution from industrial sources. In contrast, for urban focus groups, abandoned houses and their social and physical sequelae were a high priority while concerns about adequate sewer and water services and road maintenance were high priorities in rural communities. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to identify environmental health priorities in urban versus rural minority communities. In contrast to some previous risk perception research, the results of this study suggest prioritization of tangible, known risks in everyday life instead of rare, disaster-related events, even in communities that have recently experienced devastating damage from tornadoes. The findings can help inform future efforts to study, understand and effectively address environmental issues, and are particularly relevant to developing effective community-based strategies in vulnerable populations.

Environmental continuity: a social-geographic approach to structural change in lowering health care cost through elderly participation.

Tremendous growth in the number of elderly has resulted in the need to consider options for decreasing their need for dependent living, while increasing their level of health. Environmental continuity is supported as one such alternative. An examination of how the elderly relate to their surroundings and their relationships with others enables the identification of social and cultural thresholds beyond which the elderly cannot be expected to predict, participate in, or control events in their environment. "Threshold management" is suggested as a preventive health measure for reducing social disintegration in the elderly and concomitant strains to the health care system and society.