Once tired, always tired? Limitations in function over time of tired patients in Dutch general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into limitations in function over time of general-practice patients who presented and were diagnosed with "tiredness". METHODS: In a routine family-practice electronic register based on use of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), 684 patients were identified who presented (in 1997 or 1998) with the complaint tiredness, who were given the same symptom diagnosis, and who still had this diagnosis on 1 August 1999. A questionnaire (WONCA/COOP charts, HAD Scale, recent medical care, tiredness and attribution) was sent to these 684 "cases" and 858 controls. In a logistic regression analysis (16 dichotomous variables), we constructed five models for optimizing sensitivity and specificity for the detection of patients with an episode of care for "tiredness". RESULTS: We received 385 fully completed questionnaires of cases, on average 19 (7~31) months after the start of their episode of care for "tiredness". The results of the 1997 and 1998 cases were similar. Cases did considerably worse than did the 385 optimally matched controls: e.g., seriously limited by tiredness: 52% of cases vs 32% of controls; poor overall health: 35% of cases vs 20% of controls; HAD Scale scores indicating anxiety or depression: about 20% of cases vs about 10% of controls. Highest sensitivity (70%) was reached by including poor overall health, recent medical care and HAD Scale depression score >10 in the model; and highest specificity (65%) by including poor overall health and a HAD Scale anxiety score >7. CONCLUSION: Patients who present with tiredness and receive the same diagnosis have a high probability of suffering from substantial limitations in function in the years following diagnosis. Their limitations are more serious than those of controls, but no indication is found for a specific limitation. The indicators are strongly related and concentrate around "poor overall health".

Tiredness in Dutch family practice. Data on patients complaining of and/or diagnosed with "tiredness".

BACKGROUND: Research including patients from the entire tiredness spectrum in family practice is needed. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to provide routine family practice data on (i) relationships between the RFE (reason for encounter) and the diagnosis "tiredness"; (ii) duration, number of encounters and family physician's (FP's) interventions in episodes of care of tiredness; and (iii) sex/age and co-morbidity of patients diagnosed with "tiredness". METHODS: Routine episode of care data from the Transition Project, coded comprehensively with the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), were used. (i) A 16 year database (1985-2000, 58 FPs, 504 145 episodes of care, 168 550 patient years) for calculating "prior probabilities" with (diagnostic) odds ratios. (ii) A "basic population" extracted from that 16 year database of patients listed for an entire 4 year period (1997-2000; n = 12 292). RESULTS: The RFE tiredness resulted in a variety of diagnoses, but most frequently (43%) in "tiredness". Most odds ratios were low or negative. Of episodes of care of tiredness, 90% started with the RFE tiredness; 72% required one encounter only, and 90% lasted <6 months. In the 4 year period, 21% of patients first presented with tiredness, and 12% were diagnosed with tiredness; both groups were skewed towards women. Average co-morbidity in tired patients (16.6) was higher than in other visiting patients (10.4), and contained more tiredness-related conditions. FPs' interventions were mainly blood test, physical exam and advice; few referrals occurred. CONCLUSIONS: For many diagnoses, the RFE tiredness hardly contributes to the Bayesian posterior probability. FPs react differently to the RFE tiredness in cases in which they diagnose the patient with "tiredness" from how they react in other cases. The characteristics of ICPC and the Dutch health care system resulted in a full integration of tiredness as an RFE and as a freestanding episode of care in the context of family practice.

[Patients with fatigue in family practice: prevalence and treatment]. / Prevalentie en behandeling van vermoeide patiënten in de huisartspraktijk; gegevens uit het transitieproject.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the prevalence and treatment of severe fatigue in general practice. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. METHOD: By means of an episode-oriented morbidity registration by 54 GPs throughout the Netherlands over the period 1985-1994 it was established how often in the course of one year 'fatigue' was listed as the reason for consultation, what diagnoses were then made, how long episodes of care because of 'fatigue' lasted and what interventions took place (n = 93,297). Of the patients with a care episode because of 'fatigue' lasting at least 6 months, age, sex, comorbidity and consumption of care were established; for this purpose use was also made of a file containing data on 4 years in succession (n = 9630). RESULTS: Per annum, 92 per 1000 listed patients consulted the GP because of fatigue. Somatic or psychic diagnoses were made in 27.7 per 1000 patients listed. The episode of care lasted 4 weeks at most in 86% and at least 6 months in approximately 4%. The GPs' management of patients with 'fatigue' included physical examination in 63% and blood testing in 34%, conversation in 35%, prescription of medication in 24% and referral to a specialist in 3%. Of the 97 patients with fatigue lasting longer than 6 months, 61% had a chronic disease or psychic problems. CONCLUSION: Fatigue is frequently encountered in general practice, but the estimate that one per 1000 listed patients meets the criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome looks a little high. It appears that GPs, in accordance with recommendations, mostly adopt a policy of wait and see.