Is beauty worth the risk? Self-confidence is the key motivating factor driving tanning bed use among undergraduate students at South Dakota universities.

Background: Exposure to ultraviolet radiation is a leading risk factor for developing all types of skin cancer. In the United States, an estimated 7.8 million young adults engage in indoor tanning. Objective: Here, it is hypothesized that certain populations of students at undergraduate universities, namely sorority members, have a greater frequency of tanning bed usage than other groups of students and that regardless of sorority status, the most important motivating factor will be the intent to enhance one's appearance. Methods: Undergraduate students at 2 state-funded universities were recruited for participation in this institutional review board-exempt survey via distribution to e-mail addresses and social media accounts affiliated with student organizations/clubs. Results: Among all respondents, the most common motivating factors for tanning bed use were the perception of improved self-appearance and boosted self-confidence. Female sorority members were more likely to use tanning beds and also more likely to report being motivated by enhanced appearance and self-confidence, than their female counterparts who were not sorority members. Limitations: The sample size (n = 321) and population of this study allows data to only be generalizable to surrounding states with similar demographics. The findings of this study are subject to recall bias as the data is self-reported. Conclusion: Tanning bed use remains a popular practice among young people. Understanding motivations for tanning bed use among populations at increased risk of partaking in this behavior allows for educating these groups on the risks associated with ultraviolet radiation exposure. It is crucial that providers continue to promote skin health and take steps to dissuade detrimental practices and possible habit-forming behaviors at the individual and state levels.

Surveying Motivations to Use Tanning Beds Among Undergraduate Students at South Dakota Universities.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to UV radiation is one of the biggest risk factors for developing all types of skin cancer. It is estimated that in the United States, 7.8 million young adults engage in indoor tanning. It is hypothesized that certain populations of students at undergraduate universities, such as sorority participants, have greater frequency of tanning bed usage than other populations and that regardless of sorority status, the most important motivating factor will be the intent to enhance one's appearance. METHODS: This study was granted exemption from the USD Institutional Review Board (IRB). Study participants were recruited through survey distribution to email addresses affiliated with undergraduate student organizations/clubs. Inclusion criteria were undergraduate student status at The University of South Dakota (USD) or South Dakota State University (SDSU), and age 18+. Survey development included interviews of dermatologists and public health professionals. Qualtrics database was used for both anonymous data collection and storage. RESULTS: Overall, 95 of 321 participants identified as being in a sorority. When asked to identify motivations for tanning bed use, the 3 highest ranked responses of participants in a sorority were: "I think I look better when I am tan", "I tan to look better for special events", and "I have more self-confidence when I am tan" with 56.47%, 48.65%, and 60.71% of participants answering, "strongly agree", respectively. There were 147 participants that identified as not being in a sorority. The 3 highest ranked responses for motivations for indoor tanning use were the same as those in a sorority with 40.82%, 26.00%, and 40.15% of participants answering "strongly agree" to the above options, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data does support the hypothesis that the most important motivating factor for young adults to use tanning beds is one's appearance. Understanding motivations for tanning bed use among at risk populations such as undergraduate students or more specifically, those participating in sororities, allows opportunity for education on the risks associated with UV radiation exposure.

Identifying the Use of Tanning Beds Among Undergraduate Students at South Dakota Universities and the Role of Providers: A Survey Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Tanning bed use is common among young adults in the United States, and it contributes to over 400,000 cases of skin cancer annually. Many college students acknowledge the risk of skin cancer with tanning bed use, but this is not always a deterrent to the behavior. This study assesses the trends regarding tanning bed usage among university students and analyzes the role that primary care providers (PCPs) and dermatologists could play in reducing participation in this risky habit. METHODS: This study used a digital survey to assess the tanning bed usage trends and other aspects of skin health among undergraduate students at South Dakota universities. The survey was developed through interviews with dermatologists and public health professionals affiliated with the University of South Dakota. RESULTS: 321 students responded to the survey; 80% identified as female, 86% as Caucasian, and 93% were from the Midwest. 41% of respondents reported having previously used tanning beds. 46% of respondents reported never having seen a dermatologist for a skin check, and 42% indicated that their PCP does not perform a skin check during routine visits. When asked how a provider might influence participants to reconsider the use of tanning beds, responses included being presented statistics related to skin cancer and visualization of physical damage resulting from exposure to ultraviolet light. CONCLUSION: This study aims to better understand the prevalence of tanning bed usage among students at South Dakota universities. It also sought to better understand how providers can intervene to help reduce participation in this behavior. Given the risk associated with tanning bed exposure, our findings suggest that many students may be at increased risk of skin cancer from this behavior alone. This should encourage PCPs to consider incorporating skin checks into their examinations and provide preventative counseling recommendations to this population.

Mobile Web App Intervention to Promote Breast Cancer Screening Among American Indian Women in the Northern Plains: Feasibility and Efficacy Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the United States and the second leading cause of death for American Indian women. American Indian women have lower rates of breast cancer screening than other racial groups, and disparities in breast cancer mortality and survival rates persist among them. To address this critical need, a culturally appropriate, accessible, and personalized intervention is necessary to promote breast cancer screening among American Indian women. This study used mobile health principles to develop a mobile web app-based mammogram intervention (wMammogram) for American Indian women in a remote, rural community in the Northern Plains. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the wMammogram intervention, which was designed to motivate American Indian women to undergo breast cancer screening, as compared with the control group, who received an educational brochure. METHODS: Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles and a multipronged recruitment strategy in a randomized controlled trial design, we developed the wMammogram intervention. This study involved 122 American Indian women aged between 40 and 70 years, who were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=62) or the control group (n=60). Those in the intervention group received personalized and culturally appropriate messages through a mobile web app, while those in the control group received an educational brochure. We measured outcomes such as mammogram receipt, intention to receive breast cancer screening after the intervention, and participants' satisfaction with and acceptance of the intervention. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of women who received the wMammogram intervention (26/62, 42%; P=.009) completed mammograms by the 6-month follow-up than the control group (12/60, 20%). The wMammogram intervention group, compared with the control group, reported significantly higher ratings on perceived effectiveness of the intervention (t120=-5.22; P<.001), increase in knowledge (t120=-4.75; P<.001), and satisfaction with the intervention (t120=-3.61; P<.001). Moreover, compared with the brochure group, the intervention group expressed greater intention to receive a mammogram in the future when it is due (62/62, 100% vs 51/60, 85%) and were more willing to recommend the intervention they received to their friends (61/62, 98.4% vs 54/60, 90%) with statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the feasibility and efficacy of the wMammogram intervention to promote breast cancer screening for American Indian women in a remote, rural community-based setting. Findings suggest that, with advancements in technology and the ubiquity of mobile devices, mobile web apps could serve as a valuable health intervention tool that builds upon low-cost technology and enhances accessibility and sustainability of preventive care to help reduce breast health disparities experienced in hard-to-reach American Indian populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530603; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05530603.

Return of Individual Research Results: Participant Perspectives in a Longitudinal Community-Based Sample.

The last decade has witnessed growing calls for the return of individual research results. Prior work in genetic studies has shown that individual, contextual, and cultural factors influence participants' preferences for individual research results. There is a gap in knowledge about participants' views about other types of results, specifically those lacking clinical significance. This study investigates the perspectives of 1587 mothers enrolled in the Northern Plains Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios to determine their perceived value of individual research results based on result type and the ability to interpret them within a normative context. Irrespective of the result type, participants attributed higher perceived value to results that were well understood than results of unknown significance.

Expanding SSOM's Health Equity Curriculum: Offering the Social Identities Workshop in New Student Orientation.

INTRODUCTION: In an effort to expand the first- and second-year curriculum surrounding bias, health equity, social determinants of health, and diversity in medicine, a student-led Social Identities Workshop was created to engage SSOM students in activities to 1) introduce definitions of systemic structures and inequities addressed throughout the Clinical Foundations curriculum, 2) encourage discussion rooted in individual experiences, uplifting shared and diverse identities among classmates and peers, and 3) end the week of orientation with an engaging, approachable, and low-stakes activity to get to know classmates better. METHODS: Pre- (n=68) and post-workshop surveys (n=75) were answered by first-year medical students about their knowledge and familiarity about social identities. The post-workshop survey also included questions to reflect on how the workshop content can be applied to interactions with peers and patients, and their satisfaction with the workshop and ideas of how to improve. RESULTS: All survey knowledge questions increased from pre- to post-workshop (M change 0.25-1.83). The majority of students recognized something new about their identities (77%), contexts of their identities (88%), and peers' identities (99%); talked to someone new (95%); and recognized applications in both school and clinic setting (93%). Nearly 40% of respondents were interested in attending another session to apply social identities to topics such as medical ethics, gender, privilege/marginalization, race, and sexual orientation. CONCLUSIONS: The Social Identities Workshop increased student knowledge of social identities with multiple positive reflections on a respectful and open environment to discuss topics of systemic inequities and think about personal identity and bias. Many students were interested in continuing these workshops to engage in more peer conversations about social identities as they apply to medicine. Additionally, staff of the SSOM Office of Student Affairs saw value in the workshop as well, advocating for its continuation as a fixture of new student orientation.

Using concept mapping to identify opportunities for HPV vaccination efforts: Perspectives from the Midwest and West Coast.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection significantly contributes to the burden of cancer in the United States, despite the existence of a highly effective vaccine. While numerous interventions to address vaccination uptake exist, vaccination rates remain low. We conducted a concept mapping exercise to solicit perspectives on barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination from state-level stakeholders in five states in the Midwest and West Coast of the U.S. We identified 10 clusters of barriers and facilitators based on participants' statements. For rural areas specifically, clusters rated as most important included education and provider influence; those rated as most feasible were education and coordinated/consistent messaging. Our results suggest that a combination of important (but potentially more difficult to implement) strategies, combined with those rated as most feasible (but potentially less impactful) may be beneficial. Our findings highlight similarities across diverse states, suggesting that states can learn from each other and work together to improve HPV vaccination rates. Using concept mapping proved to be an efficient way to collect information from diverse, stakeholders in different locations, and is a methodology that could be used for program planning in areas beyond HPV vaccination.

Medical Students' Perceptions of American Indian-Focused Educational Experiences.

INTRODUCTION: American Indians are burdened with a myriad of health disparities. As South Dakota's largest minority population, increasing medical students' experiences with the healthcare of American Indians can play a significant role in helping to alleviate American Indians' health disparities as these future physicians will be better able to predict, detect, and treat the health care needs of this population. METHODS: Survey data from 103 medical students at the University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine (SSOM) was collected and analyzed. Demographic information and perceived levels of being informed about American Indians and populations on reservations were collected. Furthermore, medical students' insights on how the SSOM can improve its students' educational experiences with American Indian populations were also collected. RESULTS: Compared to their perceived knowledge of American Indians prior to beginning medical school (26.2 percent), responding medical students believe they became more informed regarding American Indians (61.2 percent) as they progressed through medical school. Fifty-one of the 64 students (80 percent) who answered the open-ended question noted that their medical training would benefit from increased opportunities (including required) with American Indian people, culture, and reservation-based communities. CONCLUSION: There is a desire amongst medical students to increase and require more cultural information and clinical experiences with American Indian people and populations on reservations. Future research is needed to obtain medical student feedback on the newly implemented curriculum and elective opportunities.

Influences on HPV vaccination across levels of the social ecological model: perspectives from state level stakeholders.

Nationally, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates fall short of the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% completion. Although strategies to increase these rates exist, low rates persist. We used concept mapping with state-level stakeholders to better understand barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination. Concept mapping is a participatory research process in which respondents brainstorm ideas to a prompt and then sort ideas into piles. We present results of the brainstorming phase. We recruited participants identified by researchers' professional connections (n = 134) via e-mail invitations from five states (Iowa, South Dakota, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington) working in adolescent health, sexual health, cancer prevention and control, or immunization. Using Concept Systems' online software we solicited participants' beliefs about what factors have the greatest influence on HPV vaccination rates in their states. From the original sample 58.2% (n = 78) of participants completed the brainstorming activity and generated 372 statements, our team removed duplicates and edited statements for clarity, which resulted in 172 statements. We coded statements using the Social Ecological Model (SEM) to understand at what level factors affecting HPV vaccination are occurring. There were 53 statements at the individual level, 22 at the interpersonal level, 21 in community, 51 in organizational, and 25 in policy. Our results suggest that a tiered approach, utilizing multi-level interventions instead of focusing on only one level may have the most benefit. Moreover, the policy-level influences identified by participants may be difficult to modify, thus efforts should focus on implementing evidence-based interventions to have the most meaningful impact.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Needs: Assessing the COVID-19 Impact in Rural America.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of information concerning the impact of COVID-19 on rural populations. This report shares key results from a cross-sectional survey of South Dakota residents' perceptions on the impact and knowledge of COVID-19 during the early phases of the pandemic. METHODS: From March 24 to April 14, 2020, South Dakota residents (n = 4,761) reported on their psychological symptoms, pandemic-related stressful experiences, top concerns regarding the pandemic, attitudes towards COVID-19, and social distancing behaviors, and where residents were getting COVID information and who they trust to provide accurate information. RESULTS: Most participants were engaging in at least some social distancing and indicated at least moderate concern about COVID-19. Across age groups, getting sick from the coronavirus was the most frequently endorsed concern. Younger adults endorsed concerns about not being able to work, whereas older adults endorsed concerns about accessing medical care. The majority of the sample reported anxiety, worry, and sleep problems; about half the sample reported depressed mood, anhedonia, and appetite problems. Results highlight the importance of engaging public health experts and physicians in COVID-19 health messaging campaigns. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide insight into the specific challenges experienced by adults and youth in a rural state during the early phase of the pandemic. Public Health professionals and medical doctors are in a unique position to guide targeted interventions and health messaging.

The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health's Partnership River of Life: Special Issue Introduction.

In 2012, the National Institutes of Health funded the Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health (CRCAIH) to work toward two broad goals: 1) to build tribal research infrastructure, and 2) to increase research on social determinants of health in American Indian communities. As the introduction to this special issue of American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, we highlight results from the Partnership River of Life evaluation tool in order to provide broader context for the other manuscripts presented here. Insights were gained during the Partnership River of Life group discussion and evaluation process of combining the groups' rivers to create one representation of the CRCAIH partnership. Detailed results underscore insights for similar transdisciplinary groups.

A Transdisciplinary Approach is Essential to Community-based Research with American Indian Populations.

Social determinants of health and their effects on health outcomes create a complex system, with interaction between social, economic, physical, and biological factors necessitating research take a holistic approach. Transdisciplinary research, one of the three core values of the Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health, seeks to go beyond methods of knowledge production occurring solely within disciplinary boundaries, because real-world societal problems do not adhere to such restrictions. Community involvement is an essential component for successful research partnerships with American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. We posit that transdisciplinary approaches, which considers community-level expertise as an equitable component on the research team, show great potential for advancing research in AI/AN communities.

Not a One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Building Tribal Infrastructure for Research Through CRCAIH.

The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health (CRCAIH) was created to foster tribal partnerships in the Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota regions to increase capacity for tribal research. Since 2013, through community engagement and technical assistance from CRCAIH's cores and divisions, seven tribal partners have expanded research infrastructure and recognize the benefits of an established tribal research office. This manuscript showcases the unique approaches individual CRCAIH tribal partners have taken to build tribal research infrastructure. The unique experiences of the CRCAIH tribal partnership holds valuable lessons for other tribes interested in increasing research capacity through research review, regulation, and data management.

Using Social Network Analysis to Visualize Networks in American Indian Health Research.

The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health (CRCAIH) is a transdisciplinary, collaborative center focused on building American Indian tribal research infrastructure. Funded by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities in 2012, it was created as a platform to join tribal communities and researchers in South Dakota, North Dakota, and Minnesota to develop research infrastructure and stimulate research in American Indian health. The CRCAIH infrastructure has created a large network of transdisciplinary research partnerships. To understand the initial development of the CRCAIH network and understand the broader impact it has had on American Indian and Alaska Native health research, CRCAIH undertook a network analysis based on publications by collaborators working with and within CRCAIH. The network analysis showed how far the CRCAIH network went in a short period of time to create a platform for networking to build collaborations and further stimulate research with American Indian communities.

Cultivating Native American scientists: an application of an Indigenous model to an undergraduate research experience.

With growing evidence demonstrating the impact of undergraduate research experiences on educational persistence, efforts are currently being made to expand these opportunities within universities and research institutions throughout the United States. Recruiting underrepresented students into these programs has become an increasingly popular method of promoting diversity in science. Given the low matriculation into postsecondary education and completion rates among Native Americans, there is a great need for Native American undergraduate research internships. Although research has shown that Western education models tend to be less effective with Native populations, the implementation of indigenous epistemologies and pedagogies within higher education, including research experiences, is rare. This study explores the applicability of a cognitive apprenticeship merged with an indigenous approach, the Circle of Courage, to build a scientific learning environment and enhance the academic and professional development of Native students engaged in an undergraduate research experience in the health sciences. Data were drawn from focus groups with 20 students who participated in this program in 2012-2014. Questions explored the extent to which relational bonds between students and mentors were cultivated as well as the impact of this experience on the development of research skills, intellectual growth, academic and professional self-determination, and the attachment of meaning to their research experiences. Data were analyzed via deductive content analysis, allowing for an assessment of how the theoretical constructs inherent to this model (belonging, mastery, independence, and generosity) impacted students. Findings suggest that engaging Native students in research experiences that prioritize the needs of belonging, mastery, independence, and generosity can be a successful means of fostering a positive learning environment, in which students felt like significant members of a research team, developed a greater understanding and appreciation for the role of science in education and its various applications to socially relevant health issues, made more informed decisions about a career in research and the health sciences, and worked toward improving the health and well-being of others while also inspiring hope among their people back home. This study represents an extension of the application of the Circle of Courage to an undergraduate research experience and provides evidence of its ability to be used as a framework for cultivating Native scientists.

My Journey: Development and Practice-Based Evidence of a Culturally Attuned Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program for Native Youth.

A clear need exists for teen pregnancy prevention programs that are responsive to the specific needs and cultural contexts of Native American communities. Recent data indicates that the birth rate for Native teens is nearly two and a half times the rate for White teens (32.9 versus 13.2). To address this disparity, we conducted formative research with Northern Plains Native American community members, resulting in My Journey, a culturally attuned curriculum for 6⁻8th graders. My Journey is grounded in traditional values and teachings to promote self-efficacy in sexual health decision-making and engagement in prosocial behaviors. We conducted a pilot study with 6⁻8th grade students (n = 45), aged 11⁻14 years (22 females, 23 males). Pilot study findings confirm program feasibility and acceptability. The process evaluation revealed that teachers liked the curriculum, particularly its adaptability of cultural components and ease of student engagement. The outcome evaluation demonstrated that My Journey provided an avenue for NA youth to increase their sex refusal self-efficacy. Application of the culture cube framework revealed My Journey has made a meaningful practice-based evidence contribution as a community-defined, culturally integrated curriculum that is effective. Future directions include broader implementation of My Journey, including adaption for additional populations.

Development of a Pilot Grants Program in Social Determinants of Health in American Indian Health: A Program for Increasing the Representation of Underrepresented Groups in Funded Research.

The problem statement for this manuscript is to describe the literature on grant funding for underrepresented investigators, particularly American Indians, and detail the CRCAIH Pilot Grant Program and its success in developing underrepresented researchers (e.g. American Indian, early stage investigators). Grant funding is increasingly difficult to receive and the demographics of NIH grant awardees have shifted in recent decades to funding investigators that are more experienced. Additionally, racial disparities in awardees exist, particularly among American Indian (AI) researchers. Pilot grant funding mechanisms can be used by early stage investigators to collect preliminary data, which is beneficial for applying for NIH grants. The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health (CRCAIH) Pilot Grant Program (PGP) was aimed to increase research on the topic of social determinants of health in AI population health. Since there are no existing procedures for creating a PGP, CRCAIH created a PGP, and the processes are detailed here. Over four years, the CRCAIH PGP funded 15 projects with 47% of PIs or Co-PIs self-reporting as AI. Future directions for the CRCAIH PGP, including a mentoring program to provide more guidance and capacity building to the investigators, are also detailed.