Volitional questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of the finnish translation.

Background: Supporting clients' motivation to engage in occupations is essential to occupational therapy practice. The Volitional Questionnaire Finnish version (VQ-FI) can be used to evaluate volitional behaviors of clients with limited ability to communicate.Objective: The many-facet Rasch model was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the VQ-FI using the FACETS and WINSTEPS software.Methods and materials: Forty-two therapists received an in-person training on the VQ-FI and completed 226 independent ratings of clients. The VQ-FI was evaluated in its rating scale functioning, unidimensionality, person validity, rater severity, item targeting, and item/person separation.Results: The four-point rating scale demonstrated adequate functioning; the 'passive' rating category was rarely adopted. The VQ-FI showed unidimensionality, with all 14 items fitting the Rasch model. No evidence for ceiling or floor effects, and the assessment demonstrated appropriate item and person separation. The VQ-FI reliably separated participants to three levels of ability.Conclusions: The study provides preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the VQ-FI.Significance: The VQ-FI is an observational measure that can be used to evaluate clients' volitional behaviors. The VQ-FI offers practitioners and researchers a valid approach to evaluate volition that is theoretically grounded in the Model of Human Occupation.

Psychometric evaluation of the Finnish translation of the assessment of communication and interaction skills (ACIS-FI).

Background: The Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) is a widely used conceptual practice model in Finland. Therefore, Finnish translations of valid and reliable MOHO assessments are needed.Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Finnish translation of the Assessment of Communication and Interaction Skills (ACIS-FI) using the many-facet Rasch model approach.Methods and Materials: Twenty-eight occupational therapists completed an in-person training workshop on the ACIS-FI and participated as raters in this study. One hundred and forty-eight clients were rated using the ACIS-FI. Rating scale functioning, unidimensionality, person validity and rater severity, item targeting, and item and person separation statistics were examined.Results: The rating scales demonstrated adequate functioning; the rating category 'deficit' was infrequently adopted by the raters. The ACIS-FI had satisfactory construct validity, as confirmed by all items exhibiting unidimensionality within a single construct (i.e. communication and interaction skills), and appropriate item fit. Validity was further confirmed through low person misfit (6%) and low rater misfit (3.6%). No ceiling or floor effects were found. The ACIS-FI was able to separate clients into four levels of communication and interaction skills.Conclusions: This study offers evidence for the validity of the ACIS-FI as a measure of communication and interaction skills in occupational therapy.Significance: The ACIS-FI offers Finnish practitioners and researchers a valid tool to measure communication and interactions skills that is theoretically grounded in the MOHO.

Using the model of human occupation to nurture an occupational focus in the clinical reasoning of experienced therapists.

Best ooccupational therapy practice requires a commitment to ongoing learning to enhance clinical reasoning. This paper describes a five-step cooperative learning process to advance clinical reasoning based on the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO). During the five-step process the MOHO concepts and assessments provide opportunities for therapists to develop occupation-focused clinical reasoning and deepen their knowledge of the theory and its application in practice.

Occupation and meaning in the lives of women with chronic pain.

The aim of this study was to examine how women experience occupations as they live with chronic pain and more specifically to gain detailed knowledge regarding the meaning of important occupations in their life. The article is based on an analysis of 17 narratives based on an Occupational Performance History Interview. Participants were interviewed as part of their occupational therapy assessment at Orton Rehabilitation. The narratives were analysed in order to identify the experiences of doing occupations in everyday life. When interpreting their problems in and solution for doing occupations women in this study used four basic metaphors: (1) moving forward, (2) slowing down, (3) fighting and (4) standing still. The tone of the narratives varied from hopeful to hopeless and from fearful to frustrated. Each of these four types of narratives differed in: (a) the tone of the narrative, (b) the meaning ascribed to occupation, (c) how others are viewed in relation to one's doing, and (d) how the future is envisioned. The experience of occupation in the lives of women with chronic pain is heterogeneous and depends on the underlying meaning of the narrative used to experience and interpret occupational life.