Ribin, a protein encoded by a message complementary to rRNA, modulates ribosomal transcription and cell proliferation.

The control of rRNA transcription, tightly coupled to the cell cycle and growth state of the cell, is a key process for understanding the mechanisms that drive cell proliferation. Here we describe a novel protein, ribin, found in rodents, that binds to the rRNA promoter and stimulates its activity. The protein also interacts with the basal rRNA transcription factor UBF. The open reading frame encoding ribin is 96% complementary to a central region of the large rRNA. This demonstrates that ribosomal DNA-related sequences in higher eukaryotes can be expressed as protein-coding messages. Ribin contains two predicted nuclear localization sequence elements, and green fluorescent protein-ribin fusion proteins localize in the nucleus. Cell lines overexpressing ribin exhibit enhanced rRNA transcription and faster growth. Furthermore, these cells significantly overcome the suppression of rRNA synthesis caused by serum deprivation. On the other hand, the endogenous ribin level correlates positively with the amount of serum in the medium. The data show that ribin is a limiting stimulatory factor for rRNA synthesis in vivo and suggest its involvement in the pathway that adapts ribosomal transcription and cell proliferation to physiological changes.

Histone acetyltransferase and protein kinase activities copurify with a putative Xenopus RNA polymerase I holoenzyme self-sufficient for promoter-dependent transcription.

Mounting evidence suggests that eukaryotic RNA polymerases preassociate with multiple transcription factors in the absence of DNA, forming RNA polymerase holoenzyme complexes. We have purified an apparent RNA polymerase I (Pol I) holoenzyme from Xenopus laevis cells by sequential chromatography on five columns: DEAE-Sepharose, Biorex 70, Sephacryl S300, Mono Q, and DNA-cellulose. Single fractions from every column programmed accurate promoter-dependent transcription. Upon gel filtration chromatography, the Pol I holoenzyme elutes at a position overlapping the peak of Blue Dextran, suggesting a molecular mass in the range of approximately 2 MDa. Consistent with its large mass, Coomassie blue-stained sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels reveal approximately 55 proteins in fractions purified to near homogeneity. Western blotting shows that TATA-binding protein precisely copurifies with holoenzyme activity, whereas the abundant Pol I transactivator upstream binding factor does not. Also copurifying with the holoenzyme are casein kinase II and a histone acetyltransferase activity with a substrate preference for histone H3. These results extend to Pol I the suggestion that signal transduction and chromatin-modifying activities are associated with eukaryotic RNA polymerases.

Nucleosome binding by the polymerase I transactivator upstream binding factor displaces linker histone H1.

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a vertebrate RNA polymerase I transcription factor that can bend and wrap DNA. To investigate UBF's likely role as an architectural protein of rRNA genes organized in chromatin, we tested UBF's ability to bind rRNA gene enhancers assembled into nucleosome cores (DNA plus core histones) and nucleosomes (DNA plus core histones plus histone H1). UBF bound with low affinity to nucleosome cores formed with enhancer DNA probes of 162 bp. However, on nucleosome cores which contained approximately 60 bp of additional linker DNA, UBF bound with high affinity similar to its binding to naked DNA, forming a ternary DNA-core histone-UBF complex. UBF could be stripped from ternary complexes with competitor DNA to liberate nucleosome cores, rather than free DNA, suggesting that UBF binding to nucleosome cores does not displace the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. DNase I, micrococcal nuclease, and exonuclease III footprinting suggests that UBF and histone H1 interact with DNA on both sides flanking the histone octamer. Footprinting shows that UBF outcompetes histone H1 for binding to a nucleosome core and will displace, if not dissociate, H1 from its binding site on a preassembled nucleosome. These data suggest that UBF may act to prevent or reverse the assembly of transcriptionally inactive chromatin structures catalyzed by linker histone binding.

Effects of repetitive and non-repetitive rat rDNA enhancer elements on in vivo transcription by RNA polymerases I and II.

Previous study has demonstrated that a far upstream 174-bp spacer sequence of the rat rRNA-encoding (rDNA) gene can function as an enhancer in vitro in an orientation- and distance-independent manner [Dixit et al., J. Biol. Chem. 262 (1987) 11616-11622]. To demonstrate that this element can also function in vivo, two rat rDNA-cat plasmids, one with the 174-bp element and the other without this sequence, were constructed and transfected into CHO cells. Primer extension analysis of the transcripts produced after transfection showed that transcription initiation occurred at the +1 site of the rDNA. The 174-bp sequence stimulated the rat polI promoter activity in cis 4-5-fold over the control (with the promoter alone). This RNA polymerase (polI) enhancer also stimulated the mouse metallothionein-I (MT-I) and SV40 promoter activities in vivo, irrespective of its distance and orientation. Further dissection of the 174-bp element revealed that the stimulatory activity on the RNA polymerase II (polII) promoter resides within the 37-bp and 43-bp domains at the 3' end of the 174-bp element. Unlike this spacer enhancer, the 130-bp repeat element (RE) proximal to the rat promoter [Ghosh et al., Gene 125 (1993) 217-222] was unable to modulate the polII promoter activity in vivo. These data show that while the non-repetitive enhancer sequence of rat rDNA is interchangeable for the polI and polII promoters, the RE is polI-specific.

Presence of an inhibitor of RNA polymerase I mediated transcription in extracts from growth arrested mouse cells.

Extracts obtained from mouse cells growth arrested at stationary phase or under serum starvation exhibit no specific rDNA transcription activity. Experiments with mixed transcriptionally active and inactive whole cell extracts (WCE) obtained from rapidly dividing or growth arrested cells, respectively, demonstrate that rRNA synthesis in vitro can be suppressed by a polymerase I transcription inhibitory activity (PIN), present in inactive extracts. This inhibition effect is not related to increased nuclease activity and affects neither the non-specific Pol I transcription, nor a polymerase II promoter. A comparison of WCE isolated under different growth conditions indicates that PIN changes according to the physiological state of the cell. It reaches a maximal level soon after serum depletion and disappears rapidly when cells are allowed to recover in serum-rich medium. PIN can be clearly demonstrated in WCE but not in nuclear or cytoplasmic extracts and can be also obtained by an additional high salt extraction of nuclei. Furthermore, gel retardation and transcription-in-pellet assays demonstrate that rDNA promoter binding and preinitiation complex stability are similar in active and inactive WCE. This indicates that some later stage(s) of rDNA transcription, rather than the preinitiation complex formation, are attenuated by inactive extracts. Analysis of partially fractionated extracts suggests that PIN is not associated with but can be separated from polymerase I.

Every enhancer works with every promoter for all the combinations tested: could new regulatory pathways evolve by enhancer shuffling?

The promoters and enhancers of cell type-specific genes are often conserved in evolution, and hence one might expect that a given enhancer has evolved to work best with its own promoter. While this expectation may be realized in some cases, we have not found evidence for it. A total of 27 combinations of different promoters and enhancers were tested by transfection into cultured cells. We found that the relative efficiency of the enhancers is approximately the same, irrespective of the type of promoter used, i.e., there was no strong preference for any given enhancer/promoter combination. Notably, we do not see particularly strong transcription when the immunoglobulin kappa enhancer (or the immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer) is used to activate a kappa gene promoter. We propose that a generally permissive enhancer/promoter interaction is of evolutionary benefit for higher eukaryotes: by enhancer shuffling, genes could be easily brought under a new type of inducibility/cell type specificity.

Natural point mutations within rat rDNA transcription terminator elements reveal the functional importance of single bases for factor binding and termination.

The rat rDNA transcription unit extends 560-565 bp into the spacer downstream of the 28S rRNA coding region. The site of 3' end formation is located in front of a conserved 18 bp sequence element which is repeated eight times in the 3' spacer between nucleotides +582 and +1767 relative to the 3' terminus of 28S rRNA. These sequence motifs are almost identical to the RNA polymerase I transcription termination signal (the Sal I box) that has previously been identified in the 3' terminal spacer of mouse rDNA. Interestingly, each of the single rat elements contains one or more base substitutions as compared to the murine Sal I box. Individual rat Sal I boxes were cloned and tested for their ability to interact with the murine termination factor and to direct transcription termination. It is shown that five of the eight boxes represent genuine transcription terminators, while three elements contain certain point mutations which are not recognized by the nuclear Sal I box-binding protein and therefore are functionally inactive.Images

A 12 S precursor to 5.8 S rRNA associated with rat liver nucleolar 28 S rRNA.

The pre-rRNA and rRNA components of rat and mouse liver nucleolar RNA were analysed. It was shown that upon denaturation, part of the 32 S pre-rRNA is converted into 28 S rRNA and 12 S RNA. The 12 S RNA from mouse (Mr, 0.36 X 10(6)) is larger than the one from rat (Mr, 0.32 X 10(6). The 12 S RNA chain is intact and resists denaturation treatment. The non-covalent binding of this RNA with nucleolar 28 S rRNA is stronger than that of 5.8 S rRNA with 28 S rRNA. Hybridization with a rat internal-transcribed spacer rDNA fragment identifies 12 S RNA as corresponding to the 5'-end non-conserved segment of 32 S pre-rRNA, including 5.8 S rRNA. The significance of the formation of a 12 S precursor to 5.8 S rRNA in the biogenesis of ribosomes in mammalian cells is discussed.

The structure of the yeast ribosomal RNA genes. 2. The nucleotide sequence of the initiation site for ribosomal RNA transcription.

The 5'-terminal coding sequence for the 37 S precursor to rRNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is identified by reverse transcriptase extension and protection mapping with nuclease S1. The sequence of a 419 bp rDNA fragment containing the transcription initiation site and its adjacent region is determined.

Free pyrimidine nucleotide pool of Ehrlich ascites-tumour cells. Compartmentation with respect to the synthesis of heterogeneous nuclear RNA and precursors to ribosomal RNA.

The incorporation of [14C]orotate and [14C]uridine into UMP residues of hnRNA (heterogeneous nuclear RNA) and pre-rRNA (precursors to rRNA) of Eharlich ascites-tumour cells was compared: orotate was incorporated at a markedly higher rate into hnRNA. On the other hand, the rate of incorporation of uridine into pre-rRTNA was even somewhat higher than into hnRNA. The ratio of specific radioactivities of CMP to UMP residues in pre-rRNA and hnRNA was studied. At all times of labelling this ratio was similar for both RNA species independently of the precursor used. On addition of excess unlabelled uridine, the CMP/UMP labelling ratio in both pre-rRNA and hnRNA rose. However, this increase was much more pronounced with hnRNA. It is concluded that nuclear pyrimidine nucleotide pool for RNA synthesis is compartmentalized. The synthesis of hnRNa is supplied preferentially by the large and the small compartment, respectively. A detailed model for the cellular compartmentation of uridine nucleotide precursors to RNA is proposed.U