Fixed-Dose Combination of Canagliflozin and Metformin as an Adjunct to Diet and Exercise in Indian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from a Multicentric, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Study.

BACKGROUND: Canagliflozin and metformin fixed-dose combination (CANA/MET FDC), an approved treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India, effectively lowers glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), promotes weight loss, and improves patient adherence. As a regulatory requirement, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CANA/MET FDC in Indian patients with T2DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV study included Indian patients with T2DM (aged 18-65 years) inadequately controlled on diet and exercise. Patients received CANA/MET (50/500 and 50/1000 mg) immediate-release (IR) FDC twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety assessment, including adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). The secondary endpoint included a change in HbA1c from baseline to weeks 12 and 24. Descriptive statistics were used for all continuous safety variables and efficacy parameters. RESULTS: Of the 310 patients screened, 276 were enrolled. 114/274 (41.6%) patients had ≥1 treatment-emergent AE [treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), among which 29 (10.6%) were related to study intervention]. The most common TEAEs were dyslipidemia (4.7%), pyrexia (4.7%), genital infections (3.3%), hypoglycemia (3.3%), and urinary tract infections (2.6%). Three (1.1%) patients had serious TEAEs, and all cases were resolved. No deaths were reported. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.92 and -0.93% at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of CANA/MET FDC in Indian patients with T2DM, presenting a safe therapeutic option for diabetes management in India.

Fortifying Micronutrient Supplementation in India: Indian Expert consensus.

Micronutrients play a key role in human health, being involved in energy metabolism, immunity, cellular functioning, growth, and development. Deficiencies in micronutrients occur in individuals of all ages due to several factors, including inadequate diets, disease states, and overweight/obesity. Guidelines from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) Expert Group on Nutrient Requirements for Indians (2023) have specified the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for macronutrients and micronutrients. In addition, a healthy diet is crucial for overall health and should be the first step toward addressing micronutrient deficiencies. When diet is inadequate, micronutrient supplements can be provided to compensate. An expert panel of Indian doctors was convened to develop a pathway toward micronutrient supplementation among the Indian population. This Consensus Statement recognizes that different populations have varying needs for specific micronutrients, and ensuring adequate intake of such micronutrients can improve health outcomes. The panel provided recommendations for dietary practices and micronutrient supplementation when diet is inadequate. Addressing micronutrient deficiencies at the primary care level can prevent chronic deficiencies and their consequences. This Consensus Statement can serve as a primer for physicians to monitor and address deficiencies and thus help individuals maintain their health.

Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Clinical Trials and Real-world Evidence Across Two Decades.

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) has emerged as the "standard of care" basal insulin for the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Both formulations, insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and glargine 300 U/mL (Gla- 300) have been extensively studied against various comparator basal insulins across various clinical and real-world studies. In this comprehensive article, we reviewed the evidence on both insulin glargine formulations in T1DM across clinical trials and real-world studies. METHODS: Evidence in T1DM for Gla-100 and Gla-300 since their approvals in 2000 and 2015, respectively, were reviewed. RESULTS: Gla-100 when compared to the second-generation basal insulins, Gla-300 and IDeg-100, demonstrated a comparable risk of overall hypoglycemia, but the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was higher with Gla-100. Additional benefits of Gla-300 over Gla-100 include a prolonged (>24- hours) duration of action, a more stable glucose-lowering profile, improved treatment satisfaction, and greater flexibility in the dose administration timing. CONCLUSION: Both glargine formulations are largely comparable to other basal insulins in terms of glucose-lowering properties in T1DM. Further, risk of hypoglycemia is lower with Gla-100 than Neutral Protamine Hagedorn but comparable to insulin detemir.

Evolving Scope of Clinical Empathy in the Current Era of Medical Practice.

Clinical empathy is one of the most essential tools of medical practice, and it is an act of correctly acknowledging the emotional state of another without experiencing that state oneself. Empathy comprises four components. Mounting evidence exists to support the use of clinical empathy as a tactic for effective health care. Resolving the multi-fold barriers of clinical empathy is important. Clinical empathy is very important in the current era, and a trust-based relationship in patient care is a way to optimal clinical outcomes that can be achieved through better communication and treatment-compliance plans between health care professionals and patients.

Real-World User and Clinician Perspective and Experience with MiniMed™ 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop System.

INTRODUCTION: The advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) MiniMed™ 780G system changes basal insulin delivery every 5 min and auto bolus in response to sensor glucose values. We assessed the performance of the AHCL system in real-world settings for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) as well as user and clinician perspectives and satisfaction. METHODS: We held two peer group discussions: one having adults with T1DM/parents of children and adolescents with T1DM to understand their experiences with the AHCL system and another with healthcare providers (HCPs). Responses from the discussions were analyzed and categorized into themes by two independent researchers, with any inconsistencies resolved by consensus. We also analyzed data from the system uploaded to CareLink personal software. Glycemic outcomes, including time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), time above range (TAR), mean sensor glucose (SG) levels, glucose management indicator (GMI), sensor use, and percentage of time spent in AHCL, were determined. RESULTS: The peer group discussions revealed numerous key themes and issues for each group, such as the significance of setting reasonable expectations, carbohydrate counting and bolus dosing, technical difficulties, and overall user experience. The users (n = 25; T1DM; 17 female; age 13.8 ± 7.49 years; A1C 6.54 ± 0.45%; duration of diabetes 6 ± 6.78 years) were very satisfied with the system. Most users experienced consistent blood glucose values with very few hypoglycemic episodes. However, there were a few limitations reported, such as hyperglycemic episodes caused by inaccuracies in carb counting, issues with sensor connectivity, and cannula blockages or kinking for those using insulin Fiasp. Users achieved a mean GMI of 6.4 ± 0.26%, TIR of 83.0 ± 8.12%, TBR (54-70 mg/dL) of 2.0 ± 0.81%, TBR* (< 54 mg/dL) of 0%. All of the users achieved a TIR of > 70%. CONCLUSION: The use of the AHCL system in T1DM resulted in robust glycemic control, minimizing hypoglycemia. Providing training to both users and HCPs can help them use the system effectively.

Intermittent Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A New Paradigm in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: To suggest how continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may be used intermittently in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The use of CGM is largely in those with type 1 diabetes (T1D), in whom it makes sense to use CGM continuously as CGM provides a valuable tool to not only adjust their insulin doses but also to match it with their diet, physical activity, and other lifestyle modifications. In the case of T2D, however, especially for those not on insulin, the use of CGM may not be needed on a continuous basis. The use of CGM on an intermittent basis is rarely discussed in the literature. This article tries to provide clinical situations where CGM can be used intermittently. RESULTS: Intermittent use of CGM defined as the "use of CGM once in 2 or 3 months or a fixed frequency," and may be useful in several situations in those with T2D. We suggest the following indications for the intermittent use of CGM in T2D-newly diagnosed patients where treatment is being started, uncontrolled diabetes where treatment is being altered, starting intensive lifestyle modification, during infections, during preoperative control, in children and adolescents with T2D, as a motivational tool to improve behavioral modification, after metabolic surgery, and in patients on steroids, apart from other indications. CONCLUSION: Intermittent use of CGM in T2D can be useful in special situations and can also be cost saving particularly in resource-constrained regions of the world.

Reducing the Cost of Diabetes Care with Telemedicine, Smartphone, and Home Monitoring.

The effect of an increasing diabetes population has resulted in escalated costs and overburdened physicians. The increase in cost is not due to the disease per se, but because of its largely preventable complications. Patient-friendly technologies are proven to significantly reduce complications and thereby cost, but seldom practised. Telemedicine is increasingly being utilized in diabetology to improve access to health care, quality of care, and clinical/psychosocial outcomes in patients with diabetes (PWD). In PWD, patient-physician interactions are essential for improving health outcomes and preventing long-term complications. Smartphones are one of the basic modalities for telemedicine application. Mobile phone messaging applications, including text messaging and multimedia message service, could offer a convenient and cost-effective way to support desirable health behaviors. There are diabetes-related mobile apps mainly focusing on self-management of diabetes, lifestyle modification, and medication adherence motivation. With the widespread availability of high-speed Internet, remote monitoring has also become popular. Home monitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure, wearable devices, and continuous glucose monitoring also play a vital role in bringing down the long­term vascular complications of diabetes and thereby reduce the overall cost and improve the quality of life of patients. There are hundreds of tech platforms for diabetes management, of which only a few with proven efficacy and safety are recommended by physicians.

Human Digital Twin for Personalized Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Management.

Managing Elderly type 2 diabetes (E-T2D) is challenging due to geriatric conditions (e.g., co-morbidity, multiple drug intake, etc.), and personalization becomes paramount for precision medicine. This paper presents a human digital twin (HDT) framework to manage E-T2D that exploits various patient-specific data and builds a suite of models exploiting the data for prediction and management to personalize diabetes treatment in E-T2D patients. These models include mathematical and deep-learning ones that capture different patient aspects. Consequently, the HDT virtualizes the patient from different viewpoints using an HDT that mimics the patient and has interfaces to update the virtual models simultaneously from measurements. Using these models the HDT obtains deeper insights about the patient. Further, an adaptive patient model fusing this information and a learning-based model predictive control (LB-MPC) algorithm are proposed. The geriatric conditions are captured as model parameters and constraints while solving the LB-MPC to personalize the insulin infusion for E-T2D management. The HDT is deployed on and illustrated with 15 patients using clinical trials and simulations. Our results show that HDT helps improve the time-in-range from 3-75% to 86-97% and reduces insulin infusion by 14-29%.

Comparing the benefits of applying a vacuum assisted lancing device in reducing lancing pain, improving self-monitoring frequency and reducing HbA1c in people with diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For most people with diabetes (PwD), lancing fingertips for obtaining a blood sample is unavoidable during blood glucose monitoring (BGM). This study investigated the potential benefits of applying a vacuum over the penetration site immediately, before, during, and after lancing to determine if a vacuum would allow a less painful lancing process from fingertips and alternate sites, while still drawing sufficient blood, thereby allowing PwD to have a painless lancing experience and improving self-monitoring frequency. The cohort was encouraged to use a commercially available vacuum assisted lancing device. Change in pain perception, testing frequency, HbA1c, and future probability of VALD use were determined. METHODS: In a 24-week randomized open-label, interventional, cross-over trial, 110 PwD were recruited who used VALD and non-vacuum conventional lancing devices, for 12 weeks each. Percentage reduction in HbA1c, percentage BGM adherence, scores of pain perception, and probability of selecting VALD in the future were measured and compared. RESULTS: There was reduction in overall HbA1c values (mean ± SD), (from 9.01 ± 1.68% at baseline to 8.28 ± 1.66%) and individually in T1D (from 8.94 ± 1.77% to 8.25 ± 1.67%) and T2D (from 8.31 ± 1.17% to 8.59 ± 1.30) after using VALD for 12 weeks. Lower pain perception and high probability of using VALD over conventional devices were observed. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the benefits of applying a vacuum to the lance site which enhances the effectiveness in reducing and eliminating pain, improving self-monitoring frequency, and lowering HbA1c over non-vacuum conventional devices.

Gender-associated cardiometabolic risk profiles and health behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) program.

Background: In Asia, diabetes-associated death due to cardiorenal diseases were 2-3 times higher in women than men which might be due to gender disparity in quality of care and health habits. Methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from 11 Asian countries/areas were assessed using the same protocol (2007-2015). We compared treatment target attainment (HbA1c < 7%, blood pressure [BP] < 130/80 mmHg, risk-based LDL-cholesterol, lack of central obesity [waist circumference <90 cm in men or <80 cm in women), use of cardiorenal-protective drugs (renin-angiotensin system [RAS] inhibitors, statins), and self-reported health habits including self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) by gender. Analyses were stratified by countries/areas, age of natural menopause (<50 vs. ≥50 years), and comorbidities (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD], heart failure, kidney impairment [eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2]). Findings: Among 106,376 patients (53.2% men; median (interquartile range) diabetes duration: 6.0 (2.0-12.0) years; mean ± SD HbA1c 8.0 ± 1.9%; 27% insulin-treated), women were older and less likely to receive college education than men (28.9% vs. 48.8%). Women were less likely to smoke/drink alcohol and were physically less active than men. Women had lower BP (<130/80 mmHg: 29.4% vs. 25.7%), less general obesity (54.8% vs. 57.8%) but more central obesity than men (77.5% vs. 57.3%). Women were less likely to have ASCVD (12.8% vs. 17.0%) or heart failure (1.3% vs. 2.3%), but more likely to have kidney impairment (22.3% vs. 17.6%) and any-site cancer than men (2.5% vs. 1.6%). In most countries/areas, more men attained HbA1c <7% and risk-based LDL-cholesterol level than women. After adjusting for potential confounders including countries and centres, men had 1.63 odds ratio (95% CI 1.51, 1.74) of attaining ≥3 treatment targets than women. Interpretation: Asian women with T2D had worse quality of care than men especially in middle-income countries/areas, calling for targeted implementation programs to close these care gaps. Sponsor: Asia Diabetes Foundation. Funding: Nil.

Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Basal insulin combined oral therapy consisting of insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) is recommended for type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on OADs. There is a lack of clear evidence and recommendations on the combined use of basal insulin analogues to more than one OADs (glimepiride plus metformin) in effective control of glycemic parameters and its safety in terms of reduced hypoglycemic events, weight gain and cardiovascular risk. In this context, a group of clinical experts discussed the utility of basal insulin combined oral therapy with metformin and glimepiride in the current era. METHODS: The clinical experts discussed and provided their inputs virtually. The expert panel included clinical experts comprising endocrinologists and diabetologists from India and Nepal. RESULTS: The panel thoroughly reviewed existing literature on the subject and proposed clinical evidence and practice-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: These current clinical practice guidelines highlight the efficacy and safety of basal insulin combination therapy with various available basal insulins including neutral protamine hagedorn, detemir, glargine and degludec in addition to metformin and glimepiride therapy.

Expert Consensus Recommendations on Time in Range for Monitoring Glucose Levels in People with Diabetes: An Indian Perspective.

Keeping up with the global scenario, diabetes prevalence is on rise in India. Inadequate glycemic control is a major cause of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. The conventional standards of care (SOC) in diabetes, including self-monitoring of blood glucose and measurement of glycated hemoglobin, have supported achievement of glycemic control, yet there are a few limitations. With the use of current technologies and metrics, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and standardized CGM data reporting, the continuous real-time glucose levels can be measured, and importantly, the percentage of time above, below, and within the target glucose range can be calculated, which facilitates patient-centric care, a current goal in diabetes management. International consensus recommendations endorse the incorporation of CGM and CGM data reporting in SOC for diabetes management. The guidelines provide time in range (TIR) thresholds for different patient populations and different types of diabetes. However, extrapolation of these global guidelines does not aptly cover the Indian population, which has diverse diet, culture, and religious practices. In this context, a consensus meeting was held in India in 2021 with experts in the field of diabetes care. The purpose of the meeting was to develop consensus recommendations for TIR thresholds for different patient profiles in India. Those expert recommendations, together with an evidence-based review, are reported here. The aim of this agreement is to aid clinicians across India to routinely use CGM and CGM data reports for optimizing individualized diabetes care, by implementing clinical targets for TIR.

Empowering Patients with Type 1 Diabetes through a Multidisciplinary Team-assisted, Technology-Enabled Education Program.

BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate counting is a tool that helps patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to control their blood glucose. It calculates the bolus insulin dose needed from the total amount of carbohydrates consumed at each meal. However, carbohydrate counting can be quite challenging. The Diabetes Tele Management System® (DTMS®) is a telemedicine-based program that enables the patient to interact directly with a professionally trained, multidisciplinary team (MDT) of experts. This, along with technology-enabled education programs, could allow people with T1D to achieve glycemic control. METHODS: Fifty patients with T1D between 5 and 35 years with a diabetes duration of at least 6 months, baseline HbA1c of 7 or above, using SCII or MDI and willing to take part in the study were invited to participate in an MDT-assisted technology-enabled program and trained trimonthly on carbohydrate counting. The control group went on to perform carbohydrate counting independently and used technologies at their convenience. The test group additionally received continuous individual assistance from the MDT. RESULTS: The MDT-assisted patients had significantly decreased HbA1c, blood glucose levels, decreased episodes of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and reported a more positive outlook on life. CONCLUSION: Carbohydrate counting remains a challenge for youth with T1D, and errors in counting can have a clinical impact. Our data suggested that the assistance from an MDT of experts was associated with improved carbohydrate counting, which led to improved glycemic control and reduced complications.

Addendum 1: Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India.

With the emerging complexities in chronic diseases and people's lifestyles, healthcare professionals (HCPs) need to update their methods to manage and educate patients with chronic lifestyle disorders, particularly diabetes. The insulin injection technique (IIT), along with various parameters, must also be updated with newer methods. Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations (FITTER), India, has updated its recommendations to cover newer ways of detecting hypoglycaemia and lipohypertrophy, preventing needlestick injuries (NSIs), discouraging the reuse of insulin needles and encouraging good disposal. FITTER, India, is also introducing recommendations to calculate insulin bolus dose. These updated recommendations will help HCPs better manage patients with diabetes and achieve improved outcomes.

SGLT2i as a First-line Antihyperglycemic in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the Context of Indians: A Systematic Review and Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been used for almost a decade and have proven to be effective not only in managing Type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardio and renal protective features make them very useful in managing patients with risk of multiple comorbidities. This systematic review was undertaken by the authors because there is no evidence currently available in India that has studied the suitability of SGLT2i as a first-line agent in patients newly diagnosed with T2D in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, literature was searched to identify features that are considered important when deciding on a first-line agent for managing T2D. A total of 5 broad topics were identified-glycemic control, extra glycemic effects, antihyperglycemic combination therapy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. These domains had further subheadings, and a total of 16 domains were identified. Metformin is the drug of choice as a first-line agent in such situations and has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the effects of SGLT2i across these domains. A systematic literature review on each domain was conducted to compare SGLT2i with the gold standard in Indian patients newly diagnosed with T2D. Evidence was graded (levels of evidence (LoE)-A, B, and C), and recommendations (class of recommendation (CoR)-I, II, and III) were classified by the expert group as defined in the methodology. RESULTS: According to the systematic reviews conducted, 11 domains had Level A evidence, 2 domains (impact on lipids and gut microbiome) had Level B, and 3 domains had Level C (ß-cell function, renal protection, and glycemic variability) evidence. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the authors recommend SGLT2i as a first-line agent for managing newly diagnosed patients with T2D with a Class I recommendation for 13 domains and Class II for the remaining 3 (impact on lipids, gut microbiome, and ß-cell function). Although a poorer level of evidence (Level C) was available for the glycemic variability domain, the authors still reported this as Class I recommendations according to their expert opinion and consensus. CONCLUSION: This article advocates adopting SGLT2 inhibitors as the primary treatment choice for treating patients with newly diagnosed T2D in India.

Health care delivery model in India with relevance to diabetes care.

The Indian healthcare scenario presents a spectrum of contrasting landscapes. Socioeconomic factors, problems with medical infrastructure, insufficiency in the supply of medical requisites, economic disparities due to major differences in diabetes care delivery in the government and private sectors and difficulty in accessing quality health care facilities challenges effective diabetes care in India. The article gives insights into the practical solutions and the proposed White paper model to resolve major challenges faced by the Indian diabetes care sector for effective diabetes care delivered at Jothydev's Diabetes Educational Forum Global Diabetes Convention 2019.

Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The available evidence was systematically reviewed to evaluate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular (CV) and renal outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or multiple risk factors (MRF), with or without heart failure (HF), and per estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rate at baseline. METHODS: We comprehensively searched three electronic databases to retrieve publications up to 30th November 2019, which were screened for inclusion. The data extracted for the outcomes according to baseline ASCVD, HF, and eGFR levels were meta-analyzed using fixed effects model. RESULTS: Of the 735 screened citations, 15 primary and secondary publications from five CV or renal outcome trials were included. SGLT2is reduced the risk of CV death or hospitalization for HF (HHF), HHF alone, and composite renal-specific outcome, irrespective of ASCVD and HF at baseline. The three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) risk was reduced by 14% (p<0.001) in patients with ASCVD and by 10% (p = 0.018) in those without baseline HF compared with their counterparts. SGLT2is significantly reduced the risk of MACE (18%) in patients with mild kidney dysfunction (eGFR within the range of 60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). CONCLUSION: SGLT2is are effective for both secondary and primary prevention of composite CV outcomes, and secondary prevention of MACE. The upcoming evidence may strengthen the primary prevention benefits of SGLT2is.