Real-time scrotal ultrasound of patients with varicoceles: correlation with impaired semen analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential relationship between scrotal ultrasound findings and abnormal semen analysis. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with varicoceles underwent semen analysis and scrotal sonography. On ultrasound, estimated testes volume and the largest pampiniform vein diameters on the affected side at rest and with Valsalva manoeuvre in both the supine and upright positions were examined. In addition, the differences between the largest venous diameters at rest and during the Valsalva manoeuvre in each position (supine and upright) and also the differences between the largest venous diameter in the supine position and the upright position in each condition (at rest and during the Valsalva manoeuvre) were calculated. The relationship between various ultrasound parameters and impaired semen analysis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients had spermatogenesis impairment, and the remaining 16 had normal semen analysis. The difference in the mean spermatic vein diameter at rest between the supine and upright positions (cut-off point, 0.25 mm) had the highest diagnostic accuracy in differentiating the patients with abnormal sperm analysis from those with normal spermatogenesis with an area under the curve of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time scrotal ultrasound can be helpful in predicting abnormal sperm analysis in patients with varicoceles. KEY POINTS: Scrotal ultrasound is a non-invasive method to evaluate spermatic veins in varicoceles. Ultrasound can evaluate venous dimension change at rest after upright position (ΔD(R) ). ΔD( R) > 2.5 mm distinguishes patients with abnormal semen analysis. ΔD( R) has the most accuracy in predicting abnormal spermatogenesis. Ultrasound findings improve differentiation between patients with abnormal and normal spermatogeneses.

Knee sonography as a diagnostic test for medial meniscal tears in young patients.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate whether age of patient affects diagnostic accuracy of sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 74 consecutive patients (54 males and 20 females), in two different groups [group A (37 patients ≤ 30 years; mean age: 23.5 ± 5 years) and group B (37 patients > 30 years; mean age: 43.5 ± 9.35 years)] with clinical suspicion of medial meniscal tear. After inclusion, patients underwent ultrasonography and then MRI for signs of tearing. The ultrasonographic and MRI findings were compared with arthroscopic findings, which served as a gold standard for accurate detection of meniscal tearing. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting medial meniscal tears in group A were 100, 88.9, 96.5, 100, 97.3% and in group B were 83.3, 71.4, 92.6, 50, 81.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of MRI in group A were 100, 88.9, 96.5, 100, 97.3% and in group B were 96.7, 85.7, 96.7, 85.7, 94.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given the fact that the sensitivity and specificity of the results of knee sonography matched that of MRI in patients who were 30 years old or less, we suggest ultrasonography as an effective initial investigation for tears of medial meniscus in this group of patients. Patients with negative ultrasonographic findings will need no further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic studies-investigating a diagnostic test, Level II.