Radiologic Sciences Student Perceptions of Advisement.

PURPOSE: To investigate student perceptions of a structured advisement program. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, 24 radiologic sciences students were surveyed in the initial and final semesters of the program to capture their perceptions of advisement practices. Quantitative data were analyzed for percentages and descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses were analyzed for emergent themes. RESULTS: Qualitative data analyses identified 3 themes: building relationships, strengthening student performance, and determining best practices for advisement. Quantitative data demonstrated that students appreciated the advisement process and acknowledged improvements in communication skills and the feedback loop. DISCUSSION: Advisement sessions can serve an important role in identifying areas where students can improve their performance. To grow and develop, students must understand their own strengths and weaknesses. Structured forms of advisement can serve as important tools to guide advisement conversations toward specific topics. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that student advising is a vital component of radiologic sciences programs. Participants indicated that the advisement process helped them build relationships with faculty members and improved their overall performance.

Safety Resources and Processes in MR Imaging Departments.

PURPOSE: To identify current standards of safety practices, common safety resources in use, and gaps in workflow practices in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging departments. METHODS: Qualitative observational research and visual assessments of safety resources available at clinical rotation sites were conducted with subsequent open coding analysis. RESULTS: The sample varied in terms of the strength of MR systems, types of facilities, patient populations, and safety resources available. Qualitative themes included carelessness of personnel, facility design flaws, and inconsistencies in safety practices and staffing. DISCUSSION: Proper screening of patients and other individuals, appropriate use of barriers, and ferromagnetic detection systems can be effective tools for ensuring patient and personnel safety. Although various safety resources were available at most MR imaging facilities, the resources proved to be only as effective as the safety practices of the MR technologists. CONCLUSION: Safety practices in MR imaging departments can be improved upon continually. This study provides a foundation for future research on MR safety practices.