Stimulation of Critically Ill Patients: Relationship to Sedation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the number and type of stimulation events and the relationship of stimulation to sedation level in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A 4-hour direct observation was conducted in 103 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Stimulation events and sedation level before and after the stimulation were documented. Eight categories of stimulation events were developed in a previous pilot study of 36 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Sedation was measured continuously by using a processed electroencephalographic score (patient state index [PSI]) and intermittently by using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. RESULTS: Patients were mostly alert/mildly sedated (54.4%) at study enrollment. During the 349 hours of observation, 58.8% of the time included stimulation events. General auditory types of stimulation were most common (41.2% of observed time), followed by respiratory management and tactile family stimulation. For all events, auditory-talking, tactile-general, tactile-noxious, and tactile-highly noxious stimuli were associated with higher PSIs (all P < .001) after stimulation; other stimuli were not. Level of consciousness influenced response to stimuli, with almost all types of stimuli increasing PSI for patients more deeply sedated (PSI < 60) just before the stimuli. However, the effect of stimulation on PSI for more alert patients (PSI > 60) was small and variable. DISCUSSION: Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation are subjected to various forms of auditory and tactile stimulation frequently throughout the day. All types of stimuli increased arousal in patients who were more deeply sedated. The effect of stimulation in patients who were not deeply sedated was minimal and inconsistent.

Global Outcome and Late Seizures After Penetrating Versus Closed Traumatic Brain Injury: A NIDRR TBI Model Systems Study.

BACKGROUND: If and how much dural penetration influences long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is understudied, especially within the civilian population. OBJECTIVES: Using the large TBI Model Systems cohort, this study assessed and compared penetrating TBI (PTBI) and closed TBI with respect to global outcome and late seizures 2 years after injury. METHODS: After performing unadjusted PTBI versus closed TBI comparisons, multivariate regression models were built and analyzed for both outcomes by including the following additional predictors: length of unconsciousness, posttraumatic amnesia duration, hospital length of stay, age, gender, race, marital status, education level, problem substance abuse, and preinjury employment status. RESULTS: The collapsed Glasgow Outcome Scale model (n = 6111) showed significant secondary effects of PTBI with employment status. When employed before injury, individuals with PTBI were 2.62 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.57) to have a lower Glasgow Outcome Scale category. The final model for late seizures (n = 6737) showed a significant main effect for PTBI. Adjusting for other predictors, individuals with PTBI were 2.78 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 1.93-3.99) than those with closed TBI to be rehospitalized for a seizure. CONCLUSION: This study empirically demonstrates that penetrating injury mechanism has important prognostic implications.