Precision of progesterone measurements with the use of automated immunoassay analyzers and the impact on clinical decisions for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the precision of progesterone measurements obtained with the use of immunoassays and of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). DESIGN: Comparative study. SETTING: Academic, private practice, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) research centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 189 human serum samples were collected during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and early pregnancy in women undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Serum progesterone pools (n = 10; 0.2-4 ng/mL) were sent to four laboratory centers that used four different automated immunoassay analyzers. Progesterone was measured by immunoassay in triplicate at three separate time points (n = 9 per pool) and by LC-MS/MS in triplicate once (n = 3 per pool). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation (CVs) of progesterone measurements were compared for each analyzer and LC-MS/MS. RESULT(S): Progesterone measurements by immunoassay were highly correlated with those by LC-MS/MS. Only two analyzers had intraassay CVs <10% at all three experimental time points, and only two analyzers had an interassay CV <10%. Mean progesterone levels by the analyzers were different across multiple progesterone pools. CONCLUSION(S): Our results indicate that progesterone threshold measurements used for IVF clinical decisions should be interpreted cautiously and based on laboratory- and method-specific data. A validated progesterone standard incorporated into daily immunoassays could improve medical decision accuracy.

Clinical efficacy of highly purified urinary FSH versus recombinant FSH in volunteers undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a randomized, multicenter, investigator-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of highly purified human urinary follicle stimulating hormone (HP-hFSH) versus human recombinant follitropin-alpha (rFSH) in volunteers undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, investigator-blind trial. SETTING: Four assisted reproductive technology centers. PATIENT(S): One hundred fifty-two IVF patients. INTERVENTION(S): Volunteers, aged 18-39, were randomized to HP-hFSH (n = 76) versus rFSH (n = 76) at a starting dose of 300 IU in down-regulated cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate with HP-hFSH versus rFSH. RESULT(S): The total IU of gonadotropin used did not differ between the two groups. There was no difference in number of oocytes retrieved with HP-hFSH (mean = 16.3) compared with rFSH (mean = 17.1), confidence interval (CI) of difference = -3.79 to +2.18. Clinical pregnancy rate, as defined by the presence of a gestational sac, was 48.7% (CI = 37.0%-60.4%) with HP-hFSH versus 44.7% (CI = 33.3%-56.6%) with rFSH (CI of difference = -11.9% to +19.8%). Live birth rate was 38.2% (29 of 76) in both groups (CI = 27.2%-50.0%), for a difference between groups of 0.0% (CI of the difference = -15.4% to +15.4%). CONCLUSION(S): There were no statistically significant differences in mean oocyte number, clinical pregnancy rate, or live birth rate between HP-hFSH versus rFSH.

Hematuria and clot retention after transvaginal oocyte aspiration: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of bladder injury with hematuria and urinary retention after transvaginal oocyte aspiration. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Emergency room in a university medical center. PATIENT(S): A 28-year-old woman presented with urinary retention and suprapubic pain 8 hours after oocyte aspiration. INTERVENTION(S): Foley catheter, intravenous fluid bolus, bladder irrigation, and computed tomography with postvoid films that showed a blood clot in the bladder. Patient was discharged home with antibiotics and catheter in place. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical follow-up. RESULT(S): Patient passed voiding trial 4 days later and was artificially inseminated. No further hematuria or voiding problems were reported, and she had a successful pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): Patients who elect to undergo oocyte aspiration should be warned about the possibility of bladder injury because of the close proximity of the ovaries to the bladder, and physicians should have an appropriate treatment plan.