Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Liege ; 69(4): 194-9, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24923099

RESUMO

This paper is concerned with the place and role of general practitioners in the follow-up of patients submitted to bariatric surgery in the province of Liège. The results of the analysis were compared with clinical practice guidelines published by the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Fifteen interviews were conducted with GPs who follow up operated patients. The results highlight the GPs' wish to fully participate in the follow-up of those patients. Their medical supervision is centered on the HAS clinical practice guidelines, taking into account the intake deficiencies as well as the patient's psychological experience. However, some aspects are disregarded, mainly because of a lack of theoretical knowledge (some biological parameters, pregnancy and contraception). The short consultation time along with the poor communication with the hospital multidisciplinary team were mentioned as obstacles to a good quality follow-up. Progress is still needed to reach the clinical practice guidelines. However, there is a wish to better collaborate. Organising coordination meetings between professionals along with an early implication of the GP - even before surgery - represent possible solutions.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Clínicos Gerais/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Bélgica , Comunicação , Comportamento Cooperativo , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Papel do Médico , Padrões de Prática Médica
2.
Rev Med Liege ; 68(2): 74-8, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23469487

RESUMO

Although it exists since vaccination appeared, reticence towards vaccination seems to be increasing. Through a literature review, this article first analyses the reasons for this reticence. The decline of infectious diseases leads to greater attention to side effects of vaccines; on the other hand, the social evolution leads patients to search for zero risk in different aspects of life. Suspiciousness towards the State and the influence of media emphasizing potential deleterious effects of each vaccine are additional phenomena explaining people's hesitations. Anti-vaccination movements using Internet to disseminate their ideas are also responsible. Secondly, the article aims at assessing the public opinion about vaccination. It is still predominantly positive, even if questions remain. A typology of four patients' profiles based on statistical results is proposed. Finally, after having examined the medical doctors' opinion concerning vaccination, this article ends with some pieces of advice on how to deal with vaccination in the patient-doctor relationship.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Internet , Vacinação , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Opinião Pública , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...