A comparison of maceration methods for the preparation of infant skeletal remains for forensic anthropological analysis.

Very little literature currently exists prescribing which maceration method to use when preparing infant human remains, resulting in bone quality that is suitable for forensic anthropological analysis. The aim of the study was to test five maceration methods to determine which is most suitable for infant remains for forensic anthropological analysis. The sample included five neonate pig carcasses (Sus scrofa domesticus), ranging between one to three days old. Five maceration methods were tested on the pig carcasses (one pig per maceration method) to determine their effectiveness. The methods included invertebrate maceration by meal worms, chemical maceration by bleach, chemical maceration by borax solution, enzymatic maceration by laundry detergent and sodium carbonate solution, and chemical maceration by sodium hypochlorite. A scoring method was created to assess the effectiveness of each maceration method. Invertebrate maceration and chemical maceration using bleach were the least successful methods of maceration (total maceration score = 8 respectively). Chemical maceration using borax and chemical maceration using sodium hypochlorite achieved complete maceration of the skeletal remains; however, they both resulted in artifacts that are unsuitable for forensic analysis (total maceration score = 14 respectively). Enzymatic maceration using laundry detergent and sodium carbonate was the most successful method (total maceration score = 17). The detergent technique subsequently successfully macerated all five sets of infant human remains. This study has validated that the enzymatic maceration technique using laundry detergent and sodium carbonate can be used to effectively macerate the remains of infant skeletal remains for forensic anthropological analysis.

Animal scavenging on pig cadavers in the Lowveld of South Africa.

Scavenging animals often scatter skeletal remains of forensic interest and leave bite marks. This study aimed to identify scavenging animals in the rural Lowveld of South Africa and to describe their scattering pattern and bite marks on bone. Ten pig cadavers (Sus scrofa domesticus) (40-80 kg) were placed at the Wits Rural Facility, Limpopo, South Africa during the summer and winter seasons. Motion activated cameras recorded the scavenging. Scavenger species were identified and their behaviors, scattering pattern, and bite marks were described. Scavenging was primarily by vultures (hooded, white-backed, and lappet-faced). Marabou stork, slender and banded mongoose, genet, civet, warthog and honey badger also actively scavenged. Vultures began to scavenge the pig cadavers after 18hrs in summer and between 26 and 28 h in winter and skeletonized pig cadavers rapidly between 5 and 98 min. Skeletonization occurred more rapidly and diffusely in summer while winter cases were densely scattered. Overall the scattered remains were within an area of 157.9 m2/1705.5 ft2 with a radius of 7.09 m/23.3 ft. Vultures cleaned bones thoroughly with very minimal markings - primarily nonspecific scores. The described scattering pattern and bite marks will assist in the recovery and analysis of scavenged remains.

How reliable is the charred body scale? An interobserver reliability study on scoring burned remains.

The error rates of forensic techniques need to be evaluated. The charred body scale is a method for quantifying the level of decomposition in burned remains. 51 files containing photographs of burned pigs at different stages of decomposition were scored by nine participants. Each pig in the photographs was uniformly burned to a different level (Crow Glassman Scale levels 1 to 3). The Crow Glassman Scale describes five levels of burns that include singing of hair and epidermal blistering (CGS level 1) up to complete cremation of the body reducing it to ash (CGS level 5). The three CGS levels were selected to isolate potential scoring errors that may be caused by different burn levels (not accounted for in the development of the charred body scale). Each of the 51 photograph files was scored by participants using the charred body scale as if it were a unique forensic case at an unknown initial burn level and decomposition stage. Interobserver error, hence reliability, of the scores was tested using individual and average absolute agreement interclass correlations. The charred body scale is reliable for remains burned to a Crow Glassman Scale level 1 but not in higher burn levels. It is suggested that a universal scoring method be developed that accounts for multiple burn levels in a single case.

Anaerobic tolerant null: a mutant that allows Adh1 nulls to survive anaerobic treatment.

Anaerobic tolerant null (ATN) is a recessive factor that allows alcohol dehydrogenase-1 (ADH1) null individuals of Zea mays L. to survive 24 h of anaerobic conditions. ADH1 null lines that do not possess this factor survive only a few hours of anoxia. We studied ADH activity levels in protein extracts from the primary root tissue of ATN. ADH levels were similar in ATN and other ADH1 null lines, suggesting that ADH activity does not account for differences in the ability of ATN to survive anaerobic treatment. The ATN survival trait segregated as a single recessive locus in crosses between ATN and double null (Adh1-S5657, Adh2-33). We also made crosses between ATN and 1s2p, an inbred line with ADH1 activity that carries an electrophoretic mutation of Adh2, to determine whether atn increases the number of survivors over that which would be expected from the segregation of Adh1 alone and to use the Adh2P allele to study the cosegregation of Adh2 and atn. The observed number of survivors in that cross exceeded the expected number of survivors by a margin consistent with a single recessive gene adding to the ADH+ survivors. Extracts from the primary root or scutellum of induced F2 seedlings from the above crosses were assayed for ADH activity by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and simultaneously scored for survival to determine whether Adh2 and atn were segregating independently. We screened the (ATN x 1s2p)F2 progeny for ADH1 activity by staining root tips with an ADH-specific stain to select Adh1 null individuals prior to gel assay. Atn was found to be assorting independently of Adh1 and Adh2 in both crosses.