Ten-Year Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Does Synchronous Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Benefit?

AIMS: The benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metachronous oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) has previously been described and its use in current clinical practice is established. The role of SBRT in the management of synchronous OMBC remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SBRT-treated synchronous OMBC with those of SBRT-treated metachronous OMBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive extracranial OMBC patients treated with SBRT at a single institution between 2011 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, local control and distant control. Log-rank tests were used to test any differences. Cox regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. RESULTS: In total, 74 OMBC patients with 113 lesions were analysed. The median follow-up was 20 months (range 0-98). Seventy per cent of patients presented metachronously and 30% synchronously. 30 Gy in three fractions was most commonly prescribed, resulting in a median biologically effective dose (BED at α/ß = 10) of 60 Gy (range 35.7-112.5 Gy). Forty-nine per cent of patients switched systemic therapy post-SBRT (median time to switch: 14 months, range 0-79). Two patients (2%) experienced grade 3 acute toxicities with no grade ≥4 toxicities. At 2 years overall survival was 92.4% and PFS 39.0%, local control 85.9% and distant control 37.0%. For metachronous and synchronous disease, respectively, 2-year local control rates were 86.5% and 85.8% and PFS rates were 35.3% and 48.3%. The median PFS of metachronous and synchronous disease were 18 months and 17 months, respectively (P = 0.86). Predictive factors on multivariate analysis were treated site for overall survival, change in systemic therapy post-SBRT for PFS and BED for local control. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm SBRT as a well-tolerated treatment for OMBC with excellent local control rates regardless of metachronous or synchronous presentation. There is no suggestion that survival outcomes are inferior for synchronous disease. Further prospective studies are required to validate this finding.

Radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast: outcomes from a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Radiation induced angiosarcoma (RIAS) of the breast is a rare and aggressive complication of radiotherapy. Due to the rarity of this disease, much of the evidence for its management is based on case reports or small retrospective series. We sought to describe the management and outcomes of RIAS in a large single-institution series. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with RIAS between January 2000 and January 2014 were identified from an institutional database. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range 51-93). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to diagnosis of RIAS was 7.5 years. Median tumour size at presentation was 5.0 cm (1.5-19.0). The majority of patients presented with localised disease (47, 95.9%). Of these, 35 (74.5%) were suitable for surgery and underwent surgery with curative intent. Twelve patients presented with localised irresectable disease. Of these, 7 received systemic chemotherapy, with a sufficient response to facilitate surgery in 3 patients. Following potentially curative surgery, 2-year local recurrence-free was 55.2%. Survival was significantly prolonged in patients presenting with resectable disease (2-year overall survival 71.1% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). Tumour size >5 cm was prognostic of distant metastases-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: RIAS are rare, aggressive soft-tissue lesions with limited treatment options and high-rates of both local and systemic relapse.

Independent older adults perspectives on oral health.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore oral health experiences from the perspective of older adults' living in community dwellings. The two objectives of this study were to identify facilitators and barriers to oral health care, and to determine how utilization of oral health services compares to utilization of other healthcare services. METHODOLOGY: An interpretive descriptive methodology was employed with a purposive sample of 12 adults, aged 70 years or older. The inclusion criterion was English-speaking seniors residing in community dwellings. Community dwellings were defined as any housing outside of long-term care or other supportive living facilities. Semi-structured interviews were 30-80 min, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Three researchers participated in the comparative analysis process to develop codes, generate categories, interpret patterns and construct themes. RESULTS: Three central themes surfacing from the data were as follows: life course influences on oral health, transparency in delivery of oral health services and interrelationships between oral health and overall health. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults in this study emphasized the value of establishing collaborative and trusting relationships between oral health practitioners and older adults. Oral health practitioners should be clear and transparent when communicating information about oral health costs and be cognizant of different circumstances from childhood to older adulthood that inhibit or promote routine utilization of oral health services. Including oral health services as part of interdisciplinary care teams could help promote understandings of the reciprocal relationship between oral health and general health and improve oral health status for older adults.

Long term results of treatment of breast cancer without axillary surgery - Predicting a SOUND approach?

BACKGROUND: Traditionally axillary surgery has been used to provide staging information and until recently was thought to improve loco-regional control. However, a more minimal approach to the axilla is now being adopted. The aim of this study was to assess long term outcomes of patients with 'low-risk' breast cancers who did not undergo any axillary surgery. 'Low-risk' criteria were: postmenopausal, <20 mm grade 1 or <15 mm grade 2, LVI-ve, ER +ve. METHODS: Women with invasive breast cancer that did not undergo any axillary surgery were identified. Patients were censored when an event or death occurred or at last follow-up at breast clinic or with their General Practitioner. RESULTS: Between 05/01/1995-20/11/2006, 194 patients (199 tumours) were operated upon without axillary surgery. Median follow-up was 10.4 years. 128 patients met low-risk criteria and 71 did not (patient choice = 42, medical fitness = 29). In the 'low risk' cohort there were two axillary recurrences, with a cumulative incidence of 0.8% and 1.9% at 5 and 10 years respectively. DDFS was 99.2% (94.1-99.9%), and 97% (90.0-99%) at 5 and 10 years respectively and DFS was 96.6% (91.1-98.7%) and 91.2% (82.6-95.6%). OS was 90.3% (95% CI: 83.6-94.4) and 75.5% (95% CI: 65.9-82.8) at 5 and 10 years respectively. CONCLUSION: Axillary recurrence and DDFS in this low-risk cohort is favourable. In the modern era of breast cancer management it is possible to define a group of women in whom axillary surgery can be omitted.