Unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic value of SYNTAX score II.

BACKGROUND: Unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease (CAD) represents a challenging lesion with a major prognostic impact. AIM: Evaluate the clinical outcome and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) predictors of unprotected LM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an "all-comers" population. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of patients with unprotected LM stenosis treated by PCI. MACE were defined as the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: From January 2012 to December 2017, 150 consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM PCI were included. The mean age was 64±12 years and 75.3% were males. Diabetes was noted in 50.7%. Emergent revascularization was performed in 20.7% of cases, including 3.3% patients with cardiogenic shock. Distal LM was involved in 76.7% of cases. A majority of patients (94.0%) had low or intermediate SYNTAX Score I (≤32). The median SYNTAX score II was 31.1. Drug-eluting stents were used in 78.7% and bare metal stents in 21.3% of patients, mainly in emergent setting where the former were unavailable. In distal LM PCI, provisional approach was mostly used (81.7%). The median follow-up was 13.4 months. MACE occurred in 23.3% with an estimate of 37.9% at 5 years. Significant predictors of MACE were cardiogenic shock, bare metal stents use, previous PCI, and SYNTAX score II ≥30. CONCLUSION: Unprotected LM PCI presents encouraging short and long term outcomes. SYNTAX score II might represent a predictor for long-term outcome in this particular lesion subset.

Outcome predictors of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicating ST elevation myocardial infarction is burdened by a high mortality. There is only limited evidence for the management except for early revascularization and the relative ineffectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pump. AIM: Our objectives were to evaluate outcome and predictors of early all-cause 30-day mortality in the setting of cardiogenic shock complicating ST elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: From January 2009 to August 2018, all patients who presented within the first 48 hours of ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and receiving invasive management were prospectively included. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 122 consecutive patients. The mean age was 65±12 years and 74.5% of patients were males. Left ventricular failure was the most common etiology of cardiogenic shock (72.1%) and mechanical complications occurred in 8.2% of cases. Percutaneous coronary interventions were proposed for all patients and performed in a primary setting in 72.1%. A high prevalence of no reflow was noted (15.6%). Multivessel coronary artery disease was noted in 64.8% and multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions at the index procedure were performed in 22.1% of cases. Intra-aortic balloon pump was used in 17.2% of patients. The 30-day mortality was 58.2%. The only predictor of early mortality was the immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (OR=4.1, 95%CI 1.1-14.5; p=0.031). CONCLUSION: Despite invasive management strategies, 30-day mortality of cardiogenic shock complicating ST elevation myocardial infarction remained as high as 58.2%. Immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention was the only predictor of early mortality.

Feasibility and safety of Same-Day Discharge after transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a Tunisian monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: The continuing increase in care, needs and costs in cardiology with the advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques represent the ideal scenario for considering same-day discharge (SDD) PCI program. AIM: The primary endpoints were to examine feasibility and safety of SDD-PCI. METHODS: We conducted a comparative observational study of a prospective cohort (April 2017 to September 2017) where patients benefited from SDD-PCI with a retrospective cohort (October 2016 to March 2017) where patients were conventionally managed. We established pre-procedural eligibility criteria and per and post-procedural exclusion criteria to estimate feasibility of SDD-PCI. Safety was assessed at 24 hours and 30 days comparatively in both groups. RESULTS: In the one-year study period, 709 PCI were performed. The eligibility for SDD-PCI was 17.2% (122 patients) and feasibility was 14.7% (104 patients). Ultimately, 50 out of 370 patients in the prospective cohort (SDD-group) and 54 out of 339 patients in the retrospective cohort (control-group) had or could have benefited from SDD-PCI. The transradial access was the most used (98.1%). 59.7% of treated lesions were B2 or C type, 53.8% interested the left anterior descending artery and 29.8% were bifurcations. In both groups, no complications were observed at 24 hours. At 30 days, one single non-fatal myocardial infarction related to subacute stent thrombosis occurred in the SDD-group and was attributed to antiplatelet therapy interruption. CONCLUSION: SDD-PCI is feasible and safe on the condition of strict stratification criteria of patients before judging their discharge the same day after PCI.