Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in pregnancy: Nationwide analysis of patients characteristics and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) poses unique challenges in the management of pregnant patients due to the complex interplay of physiological changes of pregnancy. Despite its relatively low prevalence among pregnant women, HCM can significantly impact maternal and fetal outcomes. This study aims to enhance understanding of pregnant patients with HCM and the associated outcomes through a nationwide analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data obtained from the Agency for Healthcare Research in Quality (AHRQ) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2016 to December 2020. 3,599,855 pregnant patients without HCM and 187 pregnant patients with HCM were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, and baseline characteristics, medical comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics, including age distribution, racial composition, and prevalence of systemic organ disease, between pregnant women with and without HCM. Women with HCM had higher odds of experiencing maternal complications, such as acute heart failure and peripartum cardiomyopathy, as well as higher rates of fetal distress and obstetric interventions, including preterm delivery and caesarean section. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive cardiovascular assessment and risk stratification are essential in pregnant women with HCM to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes. Moreover, disparities in baseline characteristics and outcomes among black pregnant women with HCM highlight the need for a multifactorial approach to addressing pregnancy-related complications.

Liberal versus conservative transfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A hemoglobin (Hb) level goal of 7-8 g/dL is a standard care threshold, prompting blood transfusion. The debate over whether acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients benefit from a more liberal transfusion strategy prompted a meta-analysis of relevant trials. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies in anemic MI patients. Primary outcomes were recurrent MI and death/MI, while secondary outcomes included stroke, revascularization, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Due to the limited trials, we utilized the Paul-Mendele method with Hartung Knapp adjustment. RESULTS: Involving 2155 patients with liberal transfusion and 2170 with conservative transfusion across four RCTs, liberal transfusion did not significantly reduce MI (relative risk [RR] 0.85; 95 % CI 0.72 - 1.02, p = 0.07) or death/MI (RR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.45 - 1.71, p = 0.57). No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.25 - 2.68, p = 0.63), stroke (RR 0.89; 95 % CI 0.48 - 1.64, p = 0.50), revascularization (RR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.48 - 1.80, p = 0.68), or heart failure (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 0.04 - 28.84, p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis supports current medical guidelines, reinforcing the practice of limiting transfusions in acute MI patients to those with an Hb level of 7 or 8 g/dL. Liberal transfusion strategies did not show improved clinical outcomes.