Comparison of clinical performance of obturating materials in pulpectomies: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemomechanical debridement is insufficient to disinfect all bacteria from the root canals of primary teeth, and obturation of canals with an appropriate material thus acquires excellent importance and remains a critical step in the ultimate success of pulpectomy. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate Endoflas, Metapex, and a mixture of calcium hydroxide (CH) and zinc oxide (ZnO) as obturating materials (OMs) in primary mandibular second molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five mandibular second primary molars requiring pulpectomies were identified in children aged 4-8 years. They were randomly allocated to the three treatment groups according to the type of OM received using the block randomization technique. After the completion of chemomechanical debridement, the canals were filled with Endoflas, Metapex, and CH-ZnO mixture, respectively. The intergroup clinical and radiographic comparison was made based on Coll and Sadrian criteria to decipher their clinical performance at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed at any evaluation time interval (P > 0.05). At 6 months, the clinical success rates were 95.2% in Endoflas, 96% in Metapex, and 95.8% in the CH and ZnO mixture groups, respectively. The materials, however, behaved differently in different clinical situations. CONCLUSION: Based on the observations, all three OMs showed similar clinical success in maintaining tooth functioning, but their use can be restricted to indications. However, prospective studies with longer follow-ups with more stringent eligibility criteria are required to reach more definitive conclusions.

The Enigma of "Traumatic Pseudolipoma" and "Traumatic Herniation of Buccal Fat Pad": A Systematic Review and New Classification System of Post-Traumatic Craniofacial Fatty Masses.

PURPOSE: Intraoral traumatic herniation of the buccal fat pad has been reported using various terms such as traumatic pseudolipoma, traumatic prolapse of buccal fat pad, and traumatic avulsion of buccal fat pad. Because there is no uniformity in nomenclature, this condition needs to be distinguished from other entities such as post-traumatic pseudolipoma and lipoma and pseudoherniation of the buccal fat pad. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and thorough search of the literature was planned in online databases such as PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were traumatic pseudolipoma, traumatic herniation of buccal fat pad, and traumatic prolapse of buccal fat pad. Of 95 articles initially screened, 45 were included in the study. All pertinent data were extracted by the authors independently. Extracted data were cross-examined for any discrepancy. Summary statistics were not used because the research question did not support pooling of data. RESULTS: Only 24 cases were found to have reported the condition correctly. Terms such as traumatic pseudolipoma were used synonymously and erroneously for this condition. CONCLUSION: Based on the gross inaccuracy in reporting, the authors propose a new comprehensive classification of post-traumatic craniofacial fatty masses.