Long-term outcomes of plaque debulking with rotational atherectomy in side-branch ostial lesions to treat bifurcation coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis after rotational atherectomy of a side-branch ostium to treat bifurcation coronary lesions is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-review study of 40 consecutive patients who underwent rotational atherectomy of the sidebranch ostium to treat symptomatic bifurcation coronary lesions meeting the Medina classification (1,1,1) at our institution between 2003 and 2007. RESULTS: Twenty-two (55.0%) patients underwent rotational atherectomy of the side-branch ostium alone and 18 (45.0%) underwent rotational atherectomy of the both the main vessel and the sidebranch ostium. Most of the patients (n = 37, 92.5%) had a drug-eluting stent placed in the main vessel after rotational atherectomy. Only 8 patients (20.0%) required side-branch stents, and 2 patients (5.0%) underwent a final kissing-balloon technique. No acute closure of the side branch or coronary perforation were observed. Major adverse cardiac events included cardiac death (n = 1; 2.5%), nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 1; 2.5%), target vessel revascularization (n = 2; 5.0%) and target lesion revascularization (n = 0; 0.0%) during the mean follow-up period of 21.3 +/- 18.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy and provisional side-branch stenting to treat side-branch ostial lesions of true severe bifurcation coronary artery disease. The study results suggest that rotational atherectomy of a side-branch ostium prior to main-vessel stenting may be an option in selected patients undergoing complex bifurcation lesion angioplasty.

Usefulness of wide pulse pressure as a predictor of poor outcome after renal artery angioplasty and stenting.

Renal artery stenosis is a common cause of secondary hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement has allowed select patients with renal artery stenosis to use fewer antihypertensive agents and improve or stabilize renal function. The associations of baseline systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures (PPs) with outcomes of blood pressure (BP) and renal function were examined in 243 patients who underwent renal angioplasty and stent placement. The average PP before the procedure in patients with improvements or stabilizations in renal function was 53 +/- 20 mm Hg, compared to 107 +/- 18 mm Hg (p <0.05) in those with poorer outcomes. The average PPs before procedure were 47 +/- 15 mm Hg in those with improvements in BP, 82 +/- 10 mm Hg in those with stabilizations of BP, and 111 +/- 14 mm Hg in those with worsening BP. All findings were statistically significant (p <0.05). In conclusion, wide PP may reflect more advanced vascular stiffness and renal disease distinguishing patients less likely to benefit from revascularization.

Pre-transplant reversible pulmonary hypertension predicts higher risk for mortality after cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant fixed pulmonary hypertension is associated with higher post-transplant mortality. In this study, we assessed the significance of pre-transplant reversible pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Overall, we studied 182 patients with baseline normal pulmonary pressures or reversible pulmonary hypertension, defined as a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) to < or =2.5 Wood units (WU), who underwent cardiac transplantation. Multiple recipient and donor characteristics were assessed to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up was 42 +/- 28 months. Forty patients (22%) died during the follow-up period. Baseline hemodynamics for alive vs dead patients were as follows: pulmonary artery systolic (PAS) 42 +/- 15 vs 52 +/- 15 mm Hg; PA diastolic 21 +/- 9 vs 25 +/- 9 mm Hg; PA mean 28 +/- 11 vs 35 +/- 10 mm Hg; transpulmonary gradient (TPG) 9 +/- 4 vs 11 +/- 7 mm Hg (all p < 0.05); total pulmonary resistance 7.7 +/- 4.8 vs 8.8 +/- 3.2 WU (p = 0.08); and PVR 2.3 +/- 1.5 vs 2.9 +/- 1.6 WU (p = 0.06). In an unadjusted analysis, patients with PAS >50 mm Hg had a higher risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 5.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46 to 19.84 as compared with PAS < or =30 mm Hg). There was no significant difference in survival among patients with baseline PVR <2.5, 2.5 to 4.0 or >4.0 WU, but patients with TPG > or =16 had a higher risk of mortality (OR 4.93, 95% CI 1.84 to 13.17). PAS pressure was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06). Recipient body mass index, history of sternotomy; and donor ischemic time were the other independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension, even when reversible to a PVR of < or =2.5 WU, is associated with a higher mortality post-transplant.

Selection of patients for heart transplantation in the current era of heart failure therapy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the relationship between survival, peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO(2)), and heart failure survival score (HFSS) in the current era of heart failure (HF) therapy. BACKGROUND: Based on predicted survival, HF patients with peak VO(2) <14 ml/min/kg or medium- to high-risk HFSS are currently considered eligible for heart transplantation. However, these criteria were developed before the widespread use of beta-blockers, spironolactone, and defibrillators-interventions known to improve the survival of HF patients. METHODS: Peak VO(2) and HFSS were assessed in 320 patients followed from 1994 to 1997 (past era) and in 187 patients followed from 1999 to 2001 (current era). Outcomes were compared between these two groups of patients and those who underwent heart transplantation from 1993 to 2000. RESULTS: Survival in the past era was 78% at one year and 67% at two years, as compared with 88% and 79%, respectively, in the current era (both p < 0.01). One-year event-free survival (without urgent transplantation or left ventricular assist device) was improved in the current era, regardless of initial peak VO(2): 64% vs. 48% for peak VO(2) <10 ml/min/kg (p = 0.09), 81% vs. 70% for 10 to 14 ml/min/kg (p = 0.05), and 93% vs. 82% for >14 ml/min/kg (p = 0.04). Of the patients with peak VO(2) of 10 to 14 ml/min/kg, 55% had low-risk HFSS and exhibited 88% one-year event-free survival. One-year survival after transplantation was 88%, which is similar to the 85% rate reported by the United Network for Organ Sharing for 1999 to 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Survival for HF patients in the current era has improved significantly, necessitating re-evaluation of the listing criteria for heart transplantation.

Tolerability to beta-blocker therapy among heart failure patients in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Although beta-blockers were well-tolerated by heart failure (HF) patients in clinical trials, tolerability of these drugs in a general population of HF patients is not well-described. METHODS: We studied a total of 308 encounters with beta-blockers therapy in 268 ambulatory HF patients. Side effects and frequency and predictors of discontinuation of therapy were studied. Independent predictors of discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS: Weight gain (59%), fatigue (56%), dizziness (41%), and dyspnea (29%) were the most common side effects. Fifty-one patients (19%) were discontinued on therapy with any 1 particular beta-blocker. Fatigue (30%) and hypotension (28%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. Forty (78%) of these were given a trial with a different beta-blocker. Of these, 22 (55%) attempts with a different beta-blocker were tolerated. Thus the overall absolute discontinuation rate was only 7% for patients who were given a trial with different beta-blockers or 11% for the entire study population. Independent predictors of discontinuation of therapy included advanced symptoms, nonischemic etiology, history of pulmonary disease, and higher diuretic doses. CONCLUSION: Side effects with beta-blockers in a general population of HF patients are common; however, with changes in medical management, most patients can tolerate them eventually. In case of intolerance to one kind, a trial with a different beta-blocker is indicated.