Is full colonoscopic examination necessary in young patients with fresh bleeding per rectum?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Guidelines and practices differ regarding evaluation of young patients with fresh bleeding per rectum (FBPR). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and site of endoscopic lesions in young patients with FBPR, and to thereby determine whether full colonoscopic examination is necessary in these patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 18-50 years who were scheduled to undergo full colonoscopy for FBPR at Aga Khan University Hospital between May 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled in the study after giving informed consent. FBPR was defined as the passing of fresh blood per rectum with or without stools and/or noticing blood in the toilet bowl. Lesions were characterized as proximal or distal to the splenic flexure. Patients with positive family history of colorectal cancer, bleeding requiring blood transfusion, bleeding diathesis, or iron deficiency anemia were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Of these, 248 patients (65.4%) were under 40 years of age and 131 (34.6%) were aged 40-50 years. Mean hemoglobin was 12.93 ± 1.78 g/dL. In patients < 40 years, seven (2.8%) adenomatous polyps and malignant lesions were found, all of which were located in the distal colon. In patients aged 40-50 years, 10 (7.6%) adenomatous polyps and malignant lesions were detected, one of which was located in the proximal colon. On univariate analysis, malignant and adenomatous lesions were significant in the 40-50 years age group (P = 0.031; OR, 2.84; 95% CI 1.05-7.65). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic lesions in patients younger than 40 years with FBPR are found mostly in the distal colon and hence flexible sigmoidoscopy seems to be a reasonable evaluation tool in young patients with no other alarm symptoms.

Evaluation of three instructional methods of teaching for undergraduate medical students, at king saud university, saudi arabia.

BACKGROUND: There is an international move from traditional curriculum towards the learner - centered, and patient-oriented curriculum. In spite of its advantages, problem-based learning requires a larger number of teaching staff and space. This study was done to compare the problem-based learning (PBL), lectures and modified PBL methods. METHODS: Thirty-three fifth year medical students who were taking the Family Medicine rotation participated in the study at the College of Medicine, King Saud University. Three instructors participated in the teaching of three topics to the three groups of students. Students acted as control for themselves across the three instructional methods, namely; lectures, PBL and modified PBL. The main outcomes were students' recall of knowledge, problem solving skills and topic comprehension. RESULTS: In the initial assessment, there was a significant difference in favor of PBL and the modified PBL regarding comprehension of the topic as tested by the short answer questions (p = 0.0001), problem solving skills as tested by the modified essay question (p = 0.002). Non-significant results were observed at the second stage of assessment. The modified PBL method was the preferred one for 39% of the students, followed by the PBL (36%) and lastly the lectures (25%). CONCLUSION: This empirical study suggests some advantages for the PBL method and the modified PBL over the lecture method. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results of this important issue as the modified PBL is an affordable option for schools that can not meet the staff and space requirements of the PBL curriculum.