Repeated courses of low-dose 2 × 2 Gy radiation therapy in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

PURPOSE: In patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL), one course of low-dose radiotherapy (LD-RT) 2 × 2 Gy is emerging as new option of therapy in palliative setting. Efficacy of LD-RT when repeated remains to be determinate. This study aims to assess the efficacy of repeated LD-RT given in patients with indolent B-NHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive adult patients who received two or more courses of LD-RT 2 × 2 Gy for indolent B-NHL at Gustave Roussy institution, during the period 1990-2015 were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received two or more courses of LD-RT for indolent B-NHL during the study period. The median age was 57 (range 37-80) years, histological types were distributed among follicular lymphoma (n = 24 pts; 73%), marginal-zone lymphoma (n = 6 pts; 18%), and primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (n = 3 pts; 9%). The median number of low-dose radiation therapy courses given per patients was 2 (range 2-6). The overall response rates following the first and the second course of LD-RT were 96% and 88%, respectively (P = .31). The 1- and 2-years local control rates following the first courses of LD-RT were 94% (CI 95: 86-100) and 94% (CI 95: 86-98); and were 91% (CI 95: 82-100) and 88% (CI 95: 77-100) following the second course of LD-RT (P = .39). CONCLUSION: The repeated courses of LD-RT offered similar efficacy compare with the first course in patients with indolent B-NHL. LD-RT repeated is a simple, easy to give, and non-toxic asset that could be investigated as treatment option in patients with indolent B-NHL.

Colorectal cancer and brain metastases: An aggressive disease with a different response to treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases (BM) are rare in colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with a dismal prognosis. This work aims to report the rate of BM in CRC patients treated in a single institution, along with survival and prognostic factors. METHODS: Medical charts for patients with histologically proven CRC were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 538 patients were identified, of whom 33% developed any metastatic disease and 4.4% presented BM. Lung was the most frequently associated metastatic site (in 68% of the cases). The only factor independently associated with BM development was the presence of metastatic disease at the time of initial presentation. The median duration from initial diagnosis to BM development was 38.6 months (SD 29.1 months). Median survival after BM development was 62 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 56-68). Patients diagnosed with BM within 1 year of cancer diagnosis responded significantly better to treatment than those who acquired BM later, with a median survival after BM diagnosis of 261 days versus 61 days, respectively (p = .002). Patients with BM who received antiangiogenic therapy had an improved median survival compared to those who did not (151 days vs 59 days, p = 0.02; hazard ratio for death 0.29 [95% CI 0.09-0.94]). CONCLUSION: CRC with BM is an aggressive disease resistant to standard treatment and is associated with poor outcomes. Adding antiangiogenic therapy might be of value for those patients. Patients with BM developing early in the disease course might respond better to treatment.

New developments in the management of head and neck cancer - impact of pembrolizumab.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a heterogeneous group of upper aerodigestive tract malignancies, is the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Tobacco use and alcohol consumption were the most identified risk factors of HNSCC. However, human papilloma virus, a sexually transmitted infection, has been determined as another primary cause of HNSCC. Early-stage disease is treated with surgery or radiotherapy. Recurrent or metastatic HNSCC is associated with poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 10 months. The EXTREME protocol is commonly used in first-line setting. Recently, pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 agent, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with disease progression on or after a platinum-based therapy. It demonstrated a durable objective response rate with a good safety profile and quality of life. Many ongoing trials are evaluating the use of pembrolizumab for the treatment of HNSCC in various indications such as adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, maintenance and recurrent disease, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, radiation and targeted therapy. Finding those biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoints inhibitors has been a major concern. However, markers have been identified, such as PD-L1 expression, human papilloma virus infection, interferon-γ signature score, microsatellite instability and neoantigen production.

A retrospective, matched paired analysis comparing bendamustine containing BeEAM versus BEAM conditioning regimen: results from a single center experience.

The combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytin, and melphalan(BEAM) conditioning regimen in autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma. It is also an option in patients with very-high risk aggressive NHL in first complete remission (CR). Recently, a phase Ib-II feasibility study using bendamustine replacing carmustine (BCNU) was reported. We report herein a safety and efficacy analysis of bendamustine-EAM (BeEAM) with a control BEAM counterpart paired cohort (1/2). One hundred and two patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached and seemed to be comparable between both groups. However, grade III or greater diarrhea was significantly higher in BeEAM patients (44 vs. 15%, p = .002). The median number of days with fever >38 °C was significantly higher in BeEAM group (5.5 vs. 2, p < .001). This case-control study suggests that BeEAM followed by ASCT using bendamustine at 100 mg/m2/d is effective but has a different toxicity profile than the BEAM regimen.

How and when adjuvant treatment should be intensified in stage III colorectal cancers?

The adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) represents the standard of care in stage III colon cancer with some exceptions in old patients. Adjuvant treatment must also be discussed in high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, 40-50% of patients develop disease recurrence after curative R0 surgical resection. The liver was the most common site of recurrence followed by peritoneum. Although adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival and overall survival, 5-year overall survival remains less than 55% in stage III colon cancer. Different strategies could be adopted to escalate the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients going from aggressive intravenous chemotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to adding targeted therapies or immunotherapies. We reported in this review the published and ongoing trials evaluating these treatment modalities in colon cancer.