Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0300570, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578822

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To create a data-driven definition of post-COVID conditions (PCC) by directly measure changes in symptomatology before and after a first COVID episode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) dataset from the United States of persons of any age April 2020-September 2021. For each person with COVID (ICD-10-CM U07.1 "COVID-19" or positive test result), we selected up to 3 comparators. The final COVID symptom score was computed as the sum of new diagnoses weighted by each diagnosis' ratio of incidence in COVID group relative to comparator group. For the subset of COVID cases diagnosed in September 2021, we compared the incidence of PCC using our data-driven definition with ICD-10-CM code U09.9 "Post-COVID Conditions", first available in the US October 2021. RESULTS: The final cohort contained 588,611 people with COVID, with mean age of 48 years and 38% male. Our definition identified 20% of persons developed PCC in follow-up. PCC incidence increased with age: (7.8% of persons aged 0-17, 17.3% aged 18-64, and 33.3% aged 65+) and did not change over time (20.0% among persons diagnosed with COVID in 2020 versus 20.3% in 2021). For cases diagnosed in September 2021, our definition identified 19.0% with PCC in follow-up as compared to 2.9% with U09.9 code in follow-up. CONCLUSION: Symptom and U09.9 code-based definitions alone captured different populations. Maximal capture may consider a combined approach, particularly before the availability and routine utilization of specific ICD-10 codes and with the lack consensus-based definitions on the syndrome.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças
2.
J Infect Dis ; 229(3): 648-659, 2024 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925630

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on the effectiveness of BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine stratified by age and prior infection are lacking. METHODS: This test-negative study used data from individuals ≥5 years of age testing for SARS-CoV-2 with symptoms (15 September 2022 to 31 January 2023) at a large national retail pharmacy chain. The exposure was receipt of 2-4 wild-type doses and a BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine (>2 months since last wild-type dose). The outcome was a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Absolute (vs unvaccinated) and relative (vs 2-4 wild-type doses) vaccine effectiveness (VE) were calculated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio from logistic regression) × 100. VE was stratified by age and self-reported prior infection. RESULTS: Overall, 307 885 SARS-CoV-2 tests were included (7916 aged 5-11, 16 329 aged 12-17, and 283 640 aged ≥18 years). SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 39%; 21% were unvaccinated, 70% received 2-4 wild-type doses with no bivalent vaccine, and 9% received a BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent dose. At a median of 1-2 months after BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccination, depending on age group, absolute VE was 22%-60% and was significantly higher among those reporting prior infection (range, 55%-79%) than not (range, no protection to 50%). Relative VE was 31%-64%. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent showed early additional protection against Omicron-related symptomatic COVID-19, with hybrid immunity offering greater protection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Farmácia , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas de mRNA , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinas Combinadas
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(12): e2246915, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515946

RESUMO

Importance: Data describing the vaccine effectiveness (VE) and durability of BNT162b2 among children 5 to 11 years of age are needed. Objective: To estimate BNT162b2 VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged 5 to 11 years during Delta and Omicron variant-predominant periods and to further assess VE according to prior SARS-CoV-2 infection status and by sublineage during the Omicron variant-predominant period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This test-negative case-control study was conducted from November 2 to December 9, 2021 (Delta variant), and from January 16 to September 30, 2022 (Omicron variant), among 160 002 children tested at a large national US retail pharmacy chain, for SARS-CoV-2 via polymerase chain reaction (PCR); 62 719 children were tested during the Delta period, and 97 283 were tested during the Omicron period. Exposure: Vaccination with BNT162b2 before SARS-CoV-2 testing vs no vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR (regardless of the presence of symptoms), and the secondary outcome was confirmed symptomatic infection. Adjusted estimated VE was calculated from multilevel logistic regression models. Results: A total of 39 117 children tested positive and 131 686 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (total, 170 803; 84 487 [49%] were boys; mean [SD] age was 9 [2] years; 74 236 [43%] were White non-Hispanic or non-Latino; and 37 318 [22%] were Hispanic or Latino). Final VE analyses included 160 002 children without SARS-CoV-2 infection less than 90 days prior. The VE of 2 doses of BNT162b2 against Delta was 85% (95% CI, 80%-89%; median follow-up, 1 month) compared with the Omicron period (20% [95% CI, 17%-23%]; median follow-up, 4 months). The adjusted VE of 2 doses against Omicron at less than 3 months was 39% (95% CI, 36%-42%), and at 3 months or more, it was -1% (95% CI, -6% to 3%). Protection against Omicron was higher among children with vs without infection 90 days or more prior but decreased in all children approximately 3 months after the second dose (58% [95% CI, 49%-66%] with infection vs 37% [95% CI, 34%-41%] without infection at <3 months; 27% [95% CI, 17%-35%] with infection vs -7% [95% CI, -12% to -1%] at ≥3 months without infection). The VE of 2 doses of BNT162b2 at less than 3 months by Omicron sublineage was 40% (95% CI, 36%-43%) for BA.1, 32% (95% CI, 21%-41%) for BA.2/BA.2.12.1, and 50% (95% CI, 37%-60%) for BA.4/BA.5. After 3 months or more, VE was nonsignificant for BA.2/BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5. The VE of a booster dose was 55% (95% CI, 50%-60%) against Omicron, with no evidence of waning at 3 months or more. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, among children aged 5 to 11 years, 2 doses of BNT162b2 provided modest short-term protection against Omicron infection that was higher for those with prior infection; however, VE waned after approximately 3 months in all children. A booster dose restored protection against Omicron and was maintained for at least 3 months. These findings highlight the continued importance of booster vaccination regardless of history of prior COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Masculino , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162 , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eficácia de Vacinas
4.
J Infect Dis ; 224(7): 1170-1178, 2021 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden of noninvasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) infections in adults is unknown. We determined population-based rates of hospitalization where invasive or noninvasive GBS infections were identified among US adults in a defined catchment area. METHODS: We identified adults with clinical and laboratory-confirmed evidence of GBS infection from January 2014 through December 2016 from 6 hospitals in Louisville, Kentucky. Invasive disease was defined as GBS isolated from a normally sterile site. RESULTS: Among 1076 adults with GBS infection, the median age was 52 years, 51% were male, and 89% had ≥1 chronic medical condition. The most prevalent infection sites were skin and soft tissue (39%), urinary tract (23%), bone and joint (16%), and bloodstream (11%). Forty percent of infections were polymicrobial. The annual incidence of GBS-associated hospitalization was 73 per 100 000 adults and 68 and 100 per 100 000 for patients aged 18-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. For every invasive GBS infection, 3.7 noninvasive infections occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our population-based study outlines the full burden of GBS-associated hospitalization in adults and found incidence rates comparable to those of pneumococcal disease, where vaccines are recommended. Noninvasive disease was 3-4 times more common than invasive disease, suggesting that the GBS burden among adults is considerably greater than previously recognized.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Vaccine ; 38(4): 741-751, 2020 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with significant disease burden in adults but has not been measured uniformly. Reconciling differences across studies is critical for understanding the true burden of CAP. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of the incidence of hospitalized CAP among US adults and described the impact of key study characteristics on these estimates. RESULTS: After review of 8361 articles as of January 31, 2019, we identified 28 studies with 41 unique estimates of hospitalized CAP incidence. Among adults ≥65 years of age, annual rates of hospitalized CAP ranged from 847 to 3500 per 100,000 persons with median = 1830. Rates were lower in studies that excluded patients with healthcare-associated (but community-onset) pneumonia (HCAP; median = 2003 vs 1286; P = 0.02) or immunocompromising conditions (median = 1895 vs 1409; P = 0.27) compared to those that did not. Rates of CAP were also lower in studies that used more restrictive criteria for diagnosing pneumonia (eg, pneumonia coded in any diagnosis position [median = 2270] vs pneumonia coded in the first position only [median = 1375] in studies of administrative claims; P = 0.02). For adults <65 years of age, rates of CAP were lower (range: 89 to 1138 per 100,000; median = 199). CONCLUSIONS: CAP causes a significant disease burden among adults, particularly among those ≥65 years of age. Commonly-applied exclusion criteria (eg, persons with HCAP or immunocompromising conditions) or restrictive case definitions (eg, only including pneumonias coded in the primary diagnosis position) have led to systematic underestimation of CAP incidence in many previous studies. In studies that did not apply these restrictive criteria, the rate of hospitalization was approximately 2000 per 100,000 annually. Understanding the true burden of adult CAP is critical for highlighting the ongoing need for expanded prevention programs, including vaccination.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...