A systematic review of genome-wide analyses of methylation changes associated with assisted reproductive technologies in various tissues.

IMPORTANCE: Because analytic technologies improve, increasing amounts of data on methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and unassisted conceptions are available. However, various studies use different tissue types and different populations in their analyses, making data comparison and integration difficult. OBJECTIVE: To compare and integrate data on genome-wide analyses of methylation differences due to ART, allowing exposure of overarching themes. EVIDENCE REVIEW: All studies undertaking genome-wide analysis of human methylation differences due to ART or infertility in any tissue type across the lifespan were assessed for inclusion. FINDINGS: Seventeen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. One study assessed trophectoderm biopsies, 2 first-trimester placenta, 1 first-trimester fetal tissue, 2 term placenta, 7 cord blood, 3 newborn dried blood spots, 1 childhood buccal smears, 1 childhood peripheral blood, and 2 adult peripheral blood. Eleven studies compared tissues from in vitro fertilization (IVF) conceptions with those of unassisted conceptions, 4 compared intracytoplasmic sperm injection with unassisted conceptions, 4 compared non-IVF fertility treatment (NIFT) with unassisted conceptions, 4 compared NIFT with IVF, and 5 compared an infertile population (conceiving via various methods) with an unassisted presumably fertile population. In studies assessing placental tissue, 1 gene with potential methylation changes due to IVF when compared with unassisted conceptions was identified by 2 studies. In blood, 11 potential genes with methylation changes due to IVF compared with unassisted conceptions were identified by 2 studies, 1 of which was identified by 3 studies. Three potentially affected genes were identified by 2 studies involving blood between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and unassisted populations. There were no overlapping genes identified in any tissue type between NIFT and unassisted populations, between NIFT and IVF, or the infertility combined population when compared with the unassisted fertile population. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing studies is challenging due to differing variables between analyses. However, even in similar tissue types and populations, overlapping methylation changes are limited, suggesting that differences due to ART are minimal. RELEVANCE: Information from this systematic review is significant for providers and patients who provide and use ART to understand methylation risks that may be associated with the technology.

Infertility and treatments used have minimal effects on first-trimester placental DNA methylation and gene expression.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation alterations exist in the first-trimester human placenta between conceptions using fertility treatments and those that do not and, if so, whether they are the result of underlying infertility or fertility treatments. We also assessed whether significant alterations led to changes in gene expression. DESIGN: We compared DNA methylation of the first-trimester placenta from singleton pregnancies that resulted in live births from unassisted, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and non-IVF fertility treatment (NIFT) conceptions using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Significant CpG sites were compared with corresponding ribonucleic acid sequencing analysis in similar cohorts to determine whether methylation alterations lead to differences in gene expression. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 138 singleton pregnancies undergoing chorionic villus sampling resulting in a live birth were recruited for methylation analysis (56 unassisted, 38 NIFT, and 44 IVF conceptions). Ribonucleic acid-sequencing data consisted of 141 subjects (74 unassisted, 33 NIFT, and 34 IVF conceptions) of which 116 overlapped with the methylation cohort. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization-conceived pregnancy or pregnancy conceived via NIFT, such as ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Significant methylation changes at CpG sites after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The secondary outcome was gene expression changes of significant CpG sites. RESULT(S): Of the 741,145 probes analyzed in the placenta, few were significant at Bonferroni <0.05: 185 CpG sites (0.025%) significant in pregnancies conceived with the fertility treatments (NIFT + IVF) vs. unassisted conceptions; 28 in NIFT vs. unassisted; 195 in IVF vs. unassisted; and only 13 (0.0018%) in IVF vs. NIFT conceptions. Of all significant CpG sites combined, 10% (35) were located in genes with suggestive gene expression changes, but none were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (ribonucleic acid sequencing false discovery rate <0.05). None of the 13 differentially methylated probes in the IVF vs. NIFT placenta were located in genes with suggestive IVF vs. NIFT gene expression differences. CONCLUSION(S): Underlying infertility is the most significant contributor to the minimal differences in first-trimester placental methylation, and not the specific fertility treatment used, such as IVF.