Real time eye dose reduction in fluoroscopy with auditory and visual feedback dosimeter through swine model experiments.

This paper proposes measurement and reduction of eye dose in real time for the physician and the assistant performing fluoroscopy guided arterial puncture. Eye dose rates were measured for 30 fluoroscopy-guided punctures of bilateral femoral arteries in pigs. Fifteen fluoroscopy-guided punctures were performed using real time radiation dosimeter without auditory and visual feedback and other fifteen punctures were done using real time radiation dosimeter with visual and auditory feedback worn on forehead by an interventional cardiologist having experience of more than 10 years. The mean radiation dose rate for eyes of physician during arterial puncturing with real time radiation dosimeter with auditory feedback was 0.07 mSv/h (n = 15) whereas it was 0.18 mSv/h (n = 15) without visual and auditory feedback. The percentage of reduction with the device was 61% for eyes. In case of assistant the reduction was 33% for eyes (n = 15). The real time visual and auditory feedback dosimeter has reduced the eye dose rate of the physician and assistant and also helped him staying away from the X-ray source. Real time radiation dosimeters can be an effective tool to measure and reduce the dose to the eyes. The radiation eye dose rate for physician and assistant was significantly reduced by using real time radiation dosimeter with visual and auditory feedback. The real time radiation dosimeter not only helps in measuring but also help in minimizing the radiation dose rate for the physician and assistant in real time.

Reduction of radiation exposure to operating physician and assistant using a real-time auditory feedback dosimeter during femoral artery puncturing: a study on swine model.

BACKGROUND: Real-time dosimeters may create a relatively safer environment not only for the patient but also for the physician and the assistant as well. We propose the use of a real-time radiation measurement dosimeter having auditory feedback to reduce radiation exposure. METHODS: Radiation dose rates were measured for 30 fluoroscopy-guided puncturing procedures of femoral arteries in swine. Fifteen puncturing procedures were performed with real-time radiation measurement dosimeter having auditory feedback and other 15 were performed without auditory feedback dosimeter by an interventional cardiologist with 10 years of experience. RESULTS: The left body side of the operating physician (38%, p < 0.001) and assistant (25%, p < 0.001) was more exposed as compared to the right body side. Radiation dose rate to the left hand, left arm and left leg were reduced from 0.96 ± 0.10 to 0.79 ± 0.12 mSv/h (17% reduction, p < 0.001), from 0.11 ± 0.02 to 0.07 ± 0.01 mSv/h (36% reduction, p < 0.001) and from 0.22 ± 0.06 to 0.15 ± 0.02 mSv/h (31% reduction, p < 0.001) with the use of auditory feedback dosimeter, respectively. The mean fluoroscopic time was reduced from 4.8 ± 0.43 min to 4.2 ± 0.53 min (p < 0.001). The success rate of performing arterial puncturing was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of auditory feedback dosimeter resulted in reduction in effective dose. The sound beep alerted the physician from the danger of exposure, and this approach induced awareness and protective mindset to the operating physician and assistant.

Reduction of operator radiation exposure using a passive robotic device during fluoroscopy-guided arterial puncture: an experimental study in a swine model.

BACKGROUND: Vascular interventions imply radiation exposure to the operating physician (OP). To reduce radiation exposure, we propose a novel passive robotic device for fluoroscopy-guided arterial puncturing. METHODS: X-ray dose rates were measured for a total of 30 fluoroscopy-guided puncture femoral arteries in 15 pigs. Fifteen punctures were performed with the device while the other 15 were performed without the device by an interventional cardiologist with 10 years of experience. Parametric t test was used. RESULTS: The success rate with the device was 100%. Overall, the OP received more radiation (0.41 mSv/h) as compared to the assistant (0.06 mSv/h) (p <  0.001) and, amongst OP's body parts, hands received more radiation than other body parts (p <  0.001). The radiation dose rate to the OP's hands during arterial puncturing performed manually without the device was 0.95 ± 0.25 mSv/h whereas it was 0.14 ± 0.006 mSv/h using the device, resulting in an 85% reduction (p <  0.001). For the head, the dose was reduced from 0.16 mSv/h to 0.08 mSv/h (50% reduction, p <  0.001), and for the dominant arm, from 0.12 mSv/h to 0.07 mSv/h (42% reduction, p <  0.001). The fluoroscopy time was reduced from 4.5 ± 0.15 min to 4.3 ± 0.11 min device (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In a swine model, fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure for the OP puncturing femoral artery were significantly reduced by using the passive robotic device.