Time to teach basic and regulatory aspects of art of prescription writing for better doctor-patient safety and keeping communication accessible and straight.

PURPOSE: The basic and regulatory knowledge of prescription writing is essential for every medical student to evolve into a prescribing physician. Prescription becomes the most important clinical pharmacology tool and evidence of the medication access, prescription errors, prescribing errors, negligence and further litigations once released from the hands of the physicians. A questionnaire based cross-sectional survey was done to evaluate knowledge of basic and regulatory aspects of prescription writing in the light of growing violence against physicians in India. METHODS: The basic and regulatory knowledge and awareness of 90 practicing physicians was evaluated for arts of prescription writing by a novel questionnaire based on Indian regulatory guidelines. It was assessed for content validity, face validity, readability and reliability. A statistical significant Cronbach's alpha values of greater than 0.9, Flesh Reading Ease score of 37.4 and Flesch-Kincaid Grade level of 11.2 were obtained. A total of 39 questions comprised of 70 statements categorised into three broad sections containing 13 questions in each were asked in 30 min. RESULTS: The knowledge of the prescription writing is very limited in doctors. They are not sure that Over-The-Counter drugs do not need prescription, pharmacist is the decoder of their written prescription, cross-prescribing (prescribing drugs of other system of medicine) is illegal and they should not dictate prescription on phone. Majority of the physicians are unaware that writing prescription serial number, Rx, refill information and dispensing direction of habit forming drugs is not legal requirement in India. CONCLUSION: Medication access through prescription writing is marred with prescription errors. The physicians have limited regulatory and basic knowledge of prescription writing. Therefore their training of prescription writing through defined global teaching modules is needed. The prescription communications need to be lucid, accessible, comprehensive and straight between doctors and patients following the tenets of country specific regulatory requirements. Graphical abstract Need of standard uniform global basic and regulatory training guidelines for prescription writing.

Structured and unstructured viva voce assessment: A double-blind, randomized, comparative evaluation of medical students.

OBJECTIVES: The proper assessment orients learning in the desired direction. The structuring of assessment tools helps in minimizing the examination bias. However, the structuring of viva voce (SVV) has not been tried much. Therefore, this study was conducted to comparatively evaluate the structured written theory examination (STE) outcome with structured and unstructured viva voce assessments in third semester MBBS students. METHODOLOGY: Twenty uniform viva voce cards each containing eight structured questions with equitable, progressive cognitive levels were prepared. The random permutation (randomization) was done by shuffling the cards before the student picked up one card in a double-blind fashion. Of 135 students, 33-35 students per day were assessed for 4 continuous days through checklist-based evaluation by the same examiner following the STE. Parallel unstructured practical viva voce assessment was done for a major practical exercises held. RESULTS: The intragroup percentage coefficient of variance values progressively increased in order of unstructured practical viva assessment (UPA%, 18.25) < structured written theory examination (STE%, 47.26) < structured theory viva voce (SVV%, 63.91). Thus, SVV% is more discriminatory than UPA%. The students in appropriate categories were 72 (53%) in%vSTE-SVV, 18(13%) in %vSTE-UPA, and 20 (14%) in %vSVV-UPA, respectively. A very high statistically significant correlation (P = 0.001) is seen between STE% and SVV% and highest erroneous results are seen in %vSVV-UPA (110, 81%). CONCLUSION: The SVV provides uniform, equitable, unbiased, and reflective assessment of students. Thus, a comprehensive objective and meaningful assessment can be achieved by structuring of written theory, practical, and viva voce.

Off-label drug use in Psychiatry Outpatient Department: A prospective study at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Off-label drug prescribing is very common in Psychiatry. US-Food and Drug Administration has defined off-label drug as "use of drugs for the indication, dosage form, regimen, patient or other use constraint not mentioned in the approved labeling." OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate off-label drug use in patients attending Outpatient Department of Psychiatry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One year prospective, cross sectional study was conducted on patients attending Psychiatry Outpatient Department. Demographic data, clinical history, and complete prescription were noted in the predesigned proforma and prescriptions were analyzed for off-label drug use as per British National Formulary-2011. RESULT: A total of 250 patients were enrolled with mean age 40.36 ± 12.3 years. Most common diagnosis was major depressive disorder 101 (40.4%). A total of 980 drugs (mean 3.68 ± 1.42) were prescribed out of which 387 (39.5%) were off-label. Of 250 patients, 198 (79.2%) received at least one off-label drug. Psychopharmacological agents most frequently used in off-label manner were clonazepam 31 (12.4%), lorazepam 30 (12%), and trihexyphenidyl HCl 25 (10%). Prevalence of off-label use of these three drugs was significantly higher than other off-label drugs (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001 respectively). Inappropriate indication was the most common category of off-label use. There was positive and significant correlation between off-label prescribing and number of drugs (r = 0.722, P ≤ 0.000). Off-label prescribing was statistically significantly higher in 21-40 year age group, but no difference was seen in any co-morbid condition or in between any psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSION: Off-label drugs use is common in psychiatric OPD in our setup. Clonazepam, lorazepam, and trihexyphenidyl HCl were the most frequently used drugs in off-label manner.