RESUMO
PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: Medical undergraduates at St George's, University of London (SGUL) study a weekly clinical case during their clinical science years. Audit of the human stories demonstrated lack of diversity, mono-professionalism, and objectification of some patients. A collaborative partnership with staff, student and patient representation implemented curriculum change, including an inclusive case-writing initiative. We explored whether the reformed written cases supported the development of positive attitudes by sampling perceptions of the cases amongst students. METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted (Feb-November 2022) with first year medical students. We applied an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed to elucidate themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (i) effective learning, (ii) clinical authenticity, (iii) authentic human stories, and (iv) opportunity for rehearsing the role of a doctor. Students perceived the cases as an effective, contextual learning method, with a high degree of clinical authenticity, allowing mentalisation of doctor attitudes and behaviours in relation to patient-centredness, multidisciplinary team working and diversity. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the reformed cases created positive attitudinal change amongst students and supported transition to clinical roles. Memorable human stories had the greatest impact. Dynamic, inclusive, and collaborative case writing initiatives which integrate realism, diversity and multi-professionalism may help to foster positive experiences in students undertaking CBL sessions.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: TheSARS-CoV-2 virus caused a pandemic affecting healthcare deliveryglobally. Despite the presentation of COVID-19 infection beingfrequently dominated by respiratory symptoms; it is now notorious tohave potentially serious cardiovascular sequelae. This articleexplores current data to provide a comprehensive overview of thepathophysiology, cardiovascular risk factors, and implications ofCOVID-19. AREAS COVERED: Inherentstructure of SARS-CoV-2, and its interaction with both ACE-2 andnon-ACE-2 mediated pathways have been implicated in the developmentof cardiovascular manifestations, progressively resulting in acuterespiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure, cytokine releasesyndrome, and subsequent myocardial damage. The interplay betweenexisting and de novo cardiac complications must be noted. Forindividuals taking cardiovascular medications, pharmacologicinteractions are a crucial component. Short-term cardiovascularimpacts include arrhythmia, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart failure,and thromboembolism, whereas long-term impacts include diabetes andhypertension. To identify suitable studies, a PubMed literaturesearch was performed including key words such as 'Covid 19,''Cardiovascular disease,' 'Long covid,' etc. EXPERT OPINION: Moresophisticated planning and effective management for cardiologyhealthcare provision is crucial, especially for accommodatingchallenges associated with Long-COVID. With the potential applicationof AI and automated data, there are many avenues and sequelae thatcan be approached for investigation.
Deemed the pandemic of the century, COVID-19 is an illness affecting multiple organ systems. Although the virus is best known for its lung-related complications, its adverse effects on the heart and blood vessels are now becoming more apparent. Rapidly mutating and evolving, its unique structure enables it to undergo interactions with various proteins in the body, resulting in complications of both the heart itself and blood vessels throughout the body. Numerous risk factors have been identified to facilitate these manifestations, including existing heart disease, medication usage, and age. Research has shown that certain drug interactions induce disturbances of the heart rhythm and function. In addition to this, they can also exacerbate preexisting heart-related complications, resulting in severe manifestations. The effects on the heart and blood vessels can be divided into acute and chronic complications. Acute complications include heart failure, rhythm disturbances, heart muscle weakness, and inflammation. In addition to this, chronic complications such as high blood pressure and the new onset of diabetes could also be a consequence. Further research is necessary to improve and enhance both our understanding of the virus and our ability to anticipate heart-related symptoms early on.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Sistema Cardiovascular , Miocardite , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Telephone and video-based triage of dyspnoea has become commonplace and clinicians are faced with a new challenge in risk stratification of patients with dyspnoea due to suspected COVID-19. This review aimed to identify existing remote assessment modalities for acute dyspnoea which can be applied during pandemics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and medRxiv for studies of remote assessment of dyspnoea [PROSPERO ID: CRD42020202292]. A total of 3014 abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers and 32 studies were progressed to full text screening. RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Commonly assessed clinical features included respiratory rate, work of breathing, counting time and mental status. All studies found remote triage modalities to be appropriate for detecting severe respiratory distress or the need for emergency level care. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based tools to remotely assess dyspnoea will reduce resource strain during current and future pandemics.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Dispneia/diagnóstico , Dispneia/etiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , TriagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is varying evidence on the role of skeletonization of internal mammary artery in reducing the risk of sternal wound infections and ischemia following bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Post-operative clinical outcomes of skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery versus pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were compared. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar from inception until 15 June 2020. All studies directly comparing skeletonized and pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting were included. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Nine studies (one randomized controlled trial and eight observational studies) consisting of 3649 patients (2050 patients with skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and 1599 patients with pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery grafting) were included. Pooled effects analysis and trial sequential analysis reported significantly lower risk of sternal wound infection with skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.20-0.51, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization reduces the risk of sternal wound infections by preserving vasculature as much as possible. This facilitates its use in patients at high risk of sternal wound infection.
Assuntos
Artéria Torácica Interna , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Humanos , Anastomose de Artéria Torácica Interna-Coronária/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the availability of cardiology services and management of cardiac conditions. Elective surgeries, outpatient appointments and cardiac imaging have been largely cancelled across the world due to the risk of infection transmission and the need for reallocation of resources to deal with the increasing number of COVID-19 patients. The impact on patients with cardiac co-morbidities during these times may be drastic. However, cardiologists and hospitals across the world have implemented measures to ensure on-going monitoring and care of patients remotely. In this review, we discuss the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac services including interventional cardiology services, cardiac imaging and outpatient appointments. In addition, implications for future research and clinical practice are also discussed.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cardiologia , Cardiopatias , Cardiologia/tendências , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMO
This bibliometric analysis aims to identify publications and highlight the key areas that have shaped modern clinical practices for aortic valve replacement (AVR). In this paper, the top 100 most cited manuscripts for AVR are analyzed. The Thomson Reuters Web of Science database was searched using the terms "aortic valve replacement," "AVR," "sAVR," "tAVR," or "TAVI." The results were ranked by citation number and the top 100 articles were further analyzed by evaluating the subject, author, journal, year of publication, institution, and country of origin. Thirty-thousand and eight hundred eligible papers were examined, with an accumulation of 81 851 citations in total and a mean citation of 819 per manuscript (ranged: 344-4180). The New England Journal of Medicine had the most manuscripts whereas Circulation had the most citations. The number of citations has also significantly increased for articles published after 2000.The most cited manuscript highlighting the management of valvular heart disease, was written by Baumgartner et al By providing the most influential references, this work serves as a comprehensive guide to topics of interest in the field of AVR.
Assuntos
Valvopatia Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bibliografias como Assunto , Bibliometria , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica TranscateterRESUMO
COVID-19 has impacted the primary management of cardiac conditions, decreasing the number of interventions of coronary diseases. Elective coronary treatments and imaging have been largely cancelled across the world to make way for increased resources for COVID-19 patients. The impact on these cardiac patients during these times may be drastic. The number of hospital patients presenting with coronary symptoms during the outbreak has also decreased internationally. In this review, we discuss how COVID-19 has affected primary cardiac intervention globally and our service, possible reasons why, and how morbidity rates can be reduced by introducing scoring systems and telemedicine.