Prevention of shoulder dystocia: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate an obstetric maneuver.

OBJECTIVE: Shoulder dystocia is a major obstetric emergency defined as a failure of delivery of the fetal shoulder(s). This study evaluated whether an obstetric maneuver, the push back maneuver performed gently on the fetal head during delivery, could reduce the risk of shoulder dystocia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a multicenter, randomized, single-blind trial to compare the push back maneuver with usual care in parturient women at term. The primary outcome, shoulder dystocia, was considered to have occurred if, after delivery of the fetal head, any additional obstetric maneuver, beginning with the McRoberts maneuver, other than gentle downward traction and episiotomy was required. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 522 women to the push back maneuver group (group P) and 523 women to the standard vaginal delivery group (group S). Finally, 473 women assigned to group P and 472 women assigned to group S delivered vaginally. The rate of shoulder dystocia was significantly lower in group P (1·5%) than in group S (3·8%) (odds ratio [OR] 0·38 [0·16-0·92]; P = 0·03). After adjustment for predefined main risk factors, dystocia remained significantly lower in group P than in group S. There were no significant between-group differences in neonatal complications, including brachial plexus injury, clavicle fracture, hematoma and generalized asphyxia. CONCLUSION: In this trial in 945 women who delivered vaginally, the push back maneuver significantly decreased the risk of shoulder dystocia, as compared with standard vaginal delivery.

Foetal thyroid dysfunction: treat the mother first!

A case is presented of foetal compensated hypothyroidism due to persisting low maternal serum FT4 at the beginning of pregnancy. Diagnosis was made by means of foetal ultrasound followed by foetal blood sampling because of atypical findings. Foetal thyroid hypertrophy resolved progressively as exogenous thyroxine was administered to the mother. This case highlights once again the importance of adequate thyroid function during pregnancy.

Uterine necrosis following pelvic arterial embolization for post-partum hemorrhage: review of the literature.

Uterine necrosis is one of the rarest complications following pelvic arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). With the increasing incidence of cesarean section and abnormal placental localization (placenta previa) or placental invasion (placenta accreta/increta/percreta), more and more cases of uterine necrosis after embolization are being diagnosed and reported. Pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging provides high diagnostic accuracy, and surgical management includes hysterectomy. We performed a Medline database query following the first description of uterine necrosis after pelvic embolization (between January 1985 and January 2013). Medical subheading search words were the following: "uterine necrosis"; "embolization"; "postpartum hemorrhage". Seventeen citations reporting at least one case of uterine necrosis after pelvic embolization for PPH were included, with a total of 19 cases. This literature review discusses the etiopathogenesis, clinical and therapeutic aspects of uterine necrosis following pelvic arterial embolization, and guidelines are detailed. The mean time interval between pelvic embolization and diagnosis of uterine necrosis was 21 days (range 9-730). The main symptoms of uterine necrosis were fever, abdominal pain, menorrhagia and leukorrhea. Surgical management included total hysterectomy (n=15, 78%) or subtotal hysterectomy (n=2, 10%) and partial cystectomy with excision of the necrotic portion in three cases of associated bladder necrosis (15%). Uterine necrosis was partial in four cases (21%). Regarding the pathophysiology, four factors may be involved in uterine necrosis: the size and nature of the embolizing agent, the presence of the anastomotic vascular system and the embolization technique itself with the use of free flow embolization.

[Acute non-obstetrical diseases during pregnancy and role of the obstetrician]. / Maladies aiguës non obstétricales chez la femme enceinte et place de l'obstétricien.

The management of a pregnant woman with an acute non-obstetrical disease must be made in narrow collaboration with an obstetrician. This one must be warned from the beginning of the care of the patient. In a pregnant woman, any acute medical, surgical or traumatic non-obstetrical disease can have obstetrical consequences. The diagnostic and therapeutic management of an acute non-obstetrical disease can have iatrogenic consequences during pregnancy. The most often described risks are early pregnancy loss, intra-uterine fetal death, placenta abruption, direct fetal hurts, preterm labor, prematurity and its complications. Obstetrical complications can induce maternal and neonatal life-threatening risks. Simple and easily accessible examinations in emergency allow detecting the obstetrical consequences of an acute non-obstetrical disease. During the management of an acute non-obstetrical disease in a pregnant woman, the induced obstetrical consequence of the disease can require emergency action of the obstetrician in conditions associated with maternal life-threatening risk. During the management of an acute non-obstetrical disease in a pregnant woman, once the mother condition was stabilized, the obstetrician had to estimate the fetal consequences and to adapt his or her therapeutic attitude. He or she sets up the fetal and placental surveillance adapted to the obstetrical risks and decides on the duration of this surveillance.