RESUMO
During COVID-19 pandemic, many doctors were redirected from various disciplines for care of COVID-19 patients. A survey was conducted among doctors involved, to assess transfusion practices during the pandemic. To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of blood transfusion among doctors involved in care of COVID-19 patients. A cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire (Google form) was used to assess knowledge and need of transfusion, attitude towards modifications in transfusion process, and practices during pandemic. Analysis was done among subgroups based on experience (designation), user type (speciality) and frequency of blood usage in parent department. Of 1900 invitations, 437 responses were received from resident doctors and faculty members across various disciplines. Of these, 354(81%) participants were included in analysis. Mean knowledge score was 6.2, majority 297(83.9%) had adequate knowledge scores (≥ 5 of total 12). Knowledge levels were higher among frequent blood users. Positive attitude towards changes in transfusion process was observed in 72.9% participants with similar scores in subgroups. Practice was assessed in 222(62.7%) participants. Mean practice score was 6.9, wherein 57.7% participants had optimal scores (≥ 7 of total 14). Positive correlation was observed between attitude and practice, unlike knowledge and practice. Although most participants had demonstrated adequate transfusion knowledge levels and positive attitude, transfusion practices during pandemic were affected mainly due to shortage of blood components and modifications in transfusion requisition process due to stringent COVID-19 containment measures. Thus, indicating need for improvement in the basic understanding of the transfusion process. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01613-2.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Recruitment of Covid-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) donors may present as a challenge due to inexperience and differences in donor profile as compared to whole blood donation. Present study highlights the deterrents to recruiting CCP donors at a hospital based blood centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Potential CCP donors were contacted individually by telephone and a group approach through camp organisers from May to July 2020. Recruitment challenges were noted and deferrals of these recruited donors during screening and medical examination was obtained and analysed. RESULTS: Total 1165 potential CCP donors were contacted. Around 47% donors were lost due to challenges related to information storage and retrieval. Fear of health, family pressure, and fear of a new procedure were major reason (27.2%) for unwillingness to donate. The main reasons for deferral among potential donors were multiparity (38%) and being overage/underage (31.6%). Finally, 468 donors were recruited including 408 by individual approach and 60 by a group approach. From these absence of detectable COVID-19 antibodies were found in 15.4%. Few donors (9.0%) were deferred as they had not completed 28 days post recovery. CONCLUSION: The process of CCP donor recruitment differs from that of whole blood donation and requires an individualised approach with involvement of clinicians in the initial phases of the pandemic. A group approach targeting specific organisations could be adopted for a successful CCP collection program. There is a need to relook into some aspects of donor selection such as consideration of multiparous female donors and overage/underage donors after reviewing scientific evidence.
