Comparison of efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus docetaxil, cisplatin, plus fluorouracil in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Induction followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). This study evaluated and compared the efficacy of two regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with CCRT in LANPC. Patients with LANPC were randomly divided in Group I (receiving neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin) and Group II (receiving neoadjuvant docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil). Both groups also received concurrent single agent (i.e., cisplatin) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (70Gy). Treatment response was assessed at 8 weeks after the completion of CCRT using RECIST criteria. A total of 68 LANPC patients were enrolled. Group I comprised of 32 patients, with male to female ratio of 2.2, a mean (range, median) age of 38.6±11.3 (19-58, 36) years. Group II comprised of 36 patients, with male to female ratio of 3.5, mean (range, median) age of 40.9 ±11.6 (17-63, 40) years. The complete response was higher whereas the partial response was lower in Group I as compared to Group II (23/32 versus 16/36 and 06/32 versus 18/36, respectively). LANPC patients receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed higher response, as compared with docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Autogenous, alloplastic, or hybrid for total mandibular reconstruction; is here an optimal path?

For less fit patients, total reconstruction of the mandible (TRM) is an elucidated alternative for severe maxillofacial defects. This study aimed to comprehensively review and analyze the existing evidence, irrespective of the underlying pathologies, to provide a consolidated overview of the current state of TRM. An electronic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting TRM without restrictions on patient age, type of pathology underlying the mandibular defect, and study type. Electronic search identified 390 studies; only 21 met the inclusion criteria, documenting 7 (33.3%) autogenous, 6 (28.6%) alloplastic, and 8 (38.1%) hybrid TRMs. All studies reported one clinical case, except for two studies that reported two patients treated with TRM. The mean age of the patients was 39.0 ± 19.4 years, and the mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 14.7 months. Osteomyelitis was the most common pathology. Bilateral condyles were preserved in only two cases. The TRM has been reported in clinical cases only and no large cohort study is available. Functional and aesthetic parameters have either not been reported or have been reported in heterogeneous formats, thus hampering comparisons of autogenous, alloplastic, and hybrid TRMs. Overall, TRM in patients presenting with severe maxillofacial defects achieved promising clinical outcomes endowed with acceptable function and aesthetics. Large cohort studies are needed to validate these results.

Can growing patients with end-stage TMJ pathology be successfully treated with alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction? - A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The use of alloplastic total temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR) in growing patients is controversial, mainly due to immature elements of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the use of alloplastic TMJR in growing patients, focusing on the patient's clinical presentation, surgical and medical history and efficacy of alloplastic TMJR implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature search strategy was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study type (PICOS) framework. We searched Pubmed, Google Scholar, Dimension, Web of Science, X-mol, Semantic Scholar and Embase to January 2023, without any restriction on the type of publication reporting alloplastic TMJR in growing patients (age ≤ 18 years for boys and age ≤ 15 years for girls). RESULTS: A total of 15 studies (case reports: 09, case series: 02, cohort studies: 04) met the inclusion criteria, documenting 73 patients of growing age from 07 countries. Thirty-eight (~ 52%) cases were female. The mean ± SD (range) age and follow-up of patients in all studies was 13.1 ± 3.2 (0-17) years and 34.3 ± 21.5 (7-96) months, respectively. A total of 22 (30%) patients were implanted with bilateral alloplastic TMJR. Over half of the studies (n = 10) were published in the last 3 years. All patients underwent multiple surgeries prior to implantation of alloplastic TMJR. In extreme cases, patients underwent a total of 17 surgeries. Different types of studies reporting inconsistent variables restricted our ability to perform quality assessment measures for evidence building. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical experience with alloplastic TMJR in growing patients is limited to cases showing poor prognosis with other types of reconstruction. Nevertheless, studies show promising results for the use of alloplastic TMJR in growing patients, highlighting the need for well-controlled prospective studies with long-term follow-up.

Comparison of photodynamic therapy and corticosteroid therapy in management of oral lichen planus: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as an effective therapy for various dermatology conditions, including oral lichen planus (OLP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PDT in managing OLP and to compare its effectiveness with corticosteroid therapy (CST). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing databases such as PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, X-mole, and Dimensions. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that included patients with OLP undergoing treatment with PDT and CST, with no limitations on sample size or patient age. RESULTS: Out of 197 studies identified, only 8 met the inclusion criteria, involving 210 patients (104 in Group I: PDT, 106 in Group II: CST), with a female to male ratio of 3.75. Three studies reported OLP lesion numbers, six studies described lesion types, and five studies provided lesion location information. The efficacy of both PDT and CST was assessed using lesion size, pain, Thongprasom sign (ThS) scoring, efficacy index (EI), and clinical severity index (CSI). The limited and inconsistent reporting of data hindered to conduct a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: PDT effectively treats OLP lesions, leading to significant symptom reduction and improved functionality. However, limited relevant RCTs and heterogeneous data reporting hinder definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of PDT compared to CTS.

Do Case Reports on Total Mandibular, Extended, and Bilateral Total Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction Prostheses Adhere to the Surgical CAse REport Guidelines?

PURPOSE: The Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines are a standardized format for reporting surgical cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the completeness of case reports documenting alloplastic reconstruction of large craniomaxillofacial defects involving total mandibular, bilateral, and extended temporomandibular joint in major high-quality craniomaxillofacial journals, based on the SCARE guidelines. METHODS: An extensive online search was performed according to the Priority Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dimensions databases to identify relevant case reports. Each selected case report was assessed on 16 topics (38 items) of the SCARE guidelines, using a scoring scale of "0" (No/noncompliance), "1" (Yes/compliance), and "2" (unclear). The completeness of reporting (COR) score was calculated as the ratio of "yes" responses to "total" (ie, yes + no + unclear) responses. Adequacy of case reporting was denoted by a COR score of 70% or more. RESULTS: A total of 35 case reports were selected, where the male to female patients ratio was 3:4 cases, mean ± standard deviation (SD) age: 34.9 ± 16.7 years, mean ± SD follow-up duration: 17.0 ± 12.9 months, and number of patients with left, right, and bilateral temporomandibular joint reconstruction prostheses were 16, 10, and 09, respectively. The mean ± SD COR score for all 35 case reports and the individual item of the SCARE guidelines was 70.2 ± 10.5% and 66.5 ± 31.2%, respectively. The minimum and maximum COR score was found for "Keywords" (0.0%) and "Introduction" (100%) and "Clinical Findings" (100%), respectively. Adequate reporting was found for 20/35 (57%) case reports. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that case reports in major high-quality craniomaxillofacial journals suffer from insufficient reporting. Widespread adoption of available standards, such as SCARE guidelines, is proposed to improve the quality and robustness of case reporting.

Extended total temporomandibular joint reconstruction prosthesis: A comprehensive analysis.

Alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) is the treatment of choice for end-stage temporomandibular joint diseases. Extended TMJR (eTMJR) is a modification of the standard alloplastic fossa-condyle joint that includes components extending further to the skull base or the mandible. The aim of this study is to review the use of the eTMJR prosthesis for the treatment of large craniomaxillofacial defects. Data mining was performed according to the PRISMA statement using online search in databases such as PubMed (Medline), Google Scholar, Dimensions, Semantic Scholar and Web of Science. A total of 19 case reports, 08 case series and 03 retrospective studies were identified. A total of 49 patients were presented in the case reports and case series, who were implanted with 56 eTMJR prostheses (07 bilateral and 42 unilateral procedures). The mean age of the patients was 36.02±16.54 years, the male to female patient ratio was 1:1.72 and the mean follow-up time was 23.74 ± 19.83 months. The eTMJR prosthesis was most frequently used to treat ameloblastoma and hemifacial microsomia. Analysis of the retrospective studies was performed in three domains: the baseline characteristic of patients, treatment outcomes in terms of functional variables and complications after eTMJR prostheses implantation. This study concluded that the implantion of the eTMJR prosthesis was uncommon, that appropriate class of eTMJR prosthesis was not reported, and that the width of the mandibular component (like the length) of eTMJR prosthesis has substantial variations.

Treatment of pediatric bilateral condylar fractures: A comprehensive analysis.

Pediatric bilateral condylar fractures (PBCF) is a rare clinical pathology, where the management is carried out with both conservative and surgical approaches. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare these two treatment approaches and their associated long term complications in PBCF. An extensive literature review- through the search of online databases- was conducted to survey, collect, analyze and compare the reported outcomes of different treatment modalities for PBCF. The number of studies presenting PBCF case reports was 16, while the number of such retrospective studies included here was 19. Analyses of these studies revealed that the conservative treatment is preferred in PBCF patients younger than 12 years of age. Moreover, a composite approach where the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is carried out for one side while the intermaxillary fixation (IMF) for the contralateral side is frequently reported for the management of PBCF cases; this approach appears effective in improving daily functioning of temporomandibular joint and reducing long term complications. Performing ORIF for one side while IMF for the contralateral side seems the most common treatment approach in PBCF. This study may help in rapid decision making for treatment selection of PBCF patients while minimizing the risk for late complications.