Is there "cherry picking" in the ESRD Program? Perceptions from a Dialysis Provider Survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Changes in ESRD reimbursement policy, including proposed bundled payment, have raised concern that dialysis facilities may use "cherry picking" practices to attract a healthier, better insured, or more adherent patient population. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: As part of a national survey to measure beliefs about drivers of quality in dialysis, respondents were asked about their perceptions of cherry picking, including the frequency and effect of various cherry picking strategies on dialysis outcomes. We surveyed a random sample of 250 nurse members of the American Nephrology Nurses Association, 250 nephrologist members of the American Medical Association, 50 key opinion leaders, and 2000 physician members of the Renal Physicians Association. We tested hypothesized predictors of perception, including provider group, region, age, experience, and the main practice facility features. RESULTS: Three-quarters of respondents reported that cherry picking occurred "sometimes" or "frequently." There were no differences in perceptions by provider or facility characteristics, insurance status, or health status. In multivariable regression, perceived cherry picking was 2.8- and 3.5-fold higher in the northeast and Midwest, respectively, versus the west. Among various cherry picking strategies, having a "low threshold to 'fire' chronic no-shows/late arrivers," and having a "low threshold to 'fire' for noncompliance with diet and meds" had the largest perceived association with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Under current reimbursement practices, dialysis caregivers perceive that cherry picking is common and important. An improved understanding of cherry picking practices, if evident, may help to protect vulnerable patients if reimbursement practices were to change.

Kidney insufficiency and nutrient-based modulation of inflammation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with chronic kidney disease have a high cardiovascular mortality rate. Despite recent advances in dialysis techniques, over 20% of US dialysis patients die every year. Protein-energy malnutrition and inflammation are common and usually concurrent in chronic kidney disease patients, and have been implicated as the main cause of high mortality. We reviewed the pathophysiology of the malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome and its potential modulation by dietary and other nutritional interventions in chronic kidney disease patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome is a main cause of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease epidemic in chronic kidney disease. This may be by virtue of the syndrome's inflammatory components. Malnutrition and inflammation lead to weight loss over time, i.e. cachexia in slow motion, and result in decreased serum cholesterol and homocysteine levels. A 'reverse epidemiology' of cardiovascular risk factors is observed in chronic kidney disease, in that obesity, hypercholesterolemia and hyperhomocysteinemia are paradoxically associated with better survival. Among the possible etiologies of the malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome, anorexia, low nutrient intake and oxidative stress are theoretically amenable to dietary modulation; however, the bulk of findings are epidemiological. SUMMARY: There is no consensus as to how to correct the malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in chronic kidney disease patients. Because the malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome is multifactorial, its correction probably requires a battery of simultaneous interventions, rather than one single modality. Clinical trials focusing on the syndrome are currently non-existent and are therefore urgently required to improve poor clinical outcome in chronic kidney disease patients.

The Nutritional and Inflammatory Evaluation in Dialysis patients (NIED) study: overview of the NIED study and the role of dietitians.

The absolute majority of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients die within 5 years of commencing dialysis treatment, mostly because of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The strongest and most common correlates of death in MHD patients are not conventional CV risk factors, but markers of protein-energy malnutrition and inflammation, together also known as malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS). Paradoxically, classic risk factors such as obesity and hypercholesterolemia are associated with better survival in MHD patients. It has been hypothesized that this so-called reverse epidemiology is caused by the overwhelming prevalence and dominating effect of MICS in MHD patients. Hence, the key to improving survival and quality of life in MHD patients may be a better understanding of MICS and its interactions with CV disease and outcome. The Nutritional and Inflammatory Evaluation in Dialysis Patients (NIED) study is a longitudinal multicenter cohort study that aims to examine these hypotheses. At any given semiannual round, approximately 360 MHD patients from 8 DaVita dialysis facilities in the Los Angeles area are examined; 900 MHD patients will be cumulatively studied by the end of this 5-year prospective study (October 2001 to September 2006). Repeated measures of markers of nutritional status and inflammation are performed by 10 to 12 dialysis unit dietitians while patients attend their routine HD treatment in their dialysis facilities. All-cause and CV mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life are studied as outcome measures. The collaborating dietitians are the main evaluators and play crucial roles in all aspects of the study. This article reviews the design and infrastructure of the NIED study and reports preliminary findings of the first 12 to 30 months of the study.