Task-Specific Rapid Auditory Perceptual Learning in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: What Could It Mean for Speech Recognition.

OBJECTIVES: Speech recognition in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is quite variable, particularly in challenging listening conditions. Demographic, audiological, and cognitive factors explain some, but not all, of this variance. The literature suggests that rapid auditory perceptual learning explains unique variance in speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss. The present study focuses on the early adaptation phase of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning. It investigates whether adult CI recipients exhibit this learning and, if so, whether it accounts for portions of the variance in their recognition of fast speech and speech in noise. DESIGN: Thirty-six adult CI recipients (ages = 35 to 77, M = 55) completed a battery of general speech recognition tests (sentences in speech-shaped noise, four-talker babble noise, and natural-fast speech), cognitive measures (vocabulary, working memory, attention, and verbal processing speed), and a rapid auditory perceptual learning task with time-compressed speech. Accuracy in the general speech recognition tasks was modeled with a series of generalized mixed models that accounted for demographic, audiological, and cognitive factors before accounting for the contribution of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning of time-compressed speech. RESULTS: Most CI recipients exhibited early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning of time-compressed speech within the course of the first 20 sentences. This early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning had unique contribution to the recognition of natural-fast speech in quiet and speech in noise, although the contribution to natural-fast speech may reflect the rapid learning that occurred in this task. When accounting for demographic and cognitive characteristics, an increase of 1 SD in the early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning rate was associated with ~52% increase in the odds of correctly recognizing natural-fast speech in quiet, and ~19% to 28% in the odds of correctly recognizing the different types of speech in noise. Age, vocabulary, attention, and verbal processing speed also had unique contributions to general speech recognition. However, their contribution varied between the different general speech recognition tests. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous findings in other populations, in CI recipients, early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual, learning also accounts for some of the individual differences in the recognition of speech in noise and natural-fast speech in quiet. Thus, across populations, the early rapid adaptation phase of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning might serve as a skill that supports speech recognition in various adverse conditions. In CI users, the ability to rapidly adapt to ongoing acoustical challenges may be one of the factors associated with good CI outcomes. Overall, CI recipients with higher cognitive resources and faster rapid learning rates had better speech recognition.

Implicit learning and individual differences in speech recognition: an exploratory study.

Individual differences in speech recognition in challenging listening environments are pronounced. Studies suggest that implicit learning is one variable that may contribute to this variability. Here, we explored the unique contributions of three indices of implicit learning to individual differences in the recognition of challenging speech. To this end, we assessed three indices of implicit learning (perceptual, statistical, and incidental), three types of challenging speech (natural fast, vocoded, and speech in noise), and cognitive factors associated with speech recognition (vocabulary, working memory, and attention) in a group of 51 young adults. Speech recognition was modeled as a function of the cognitive factors and learning, and the unique contribution of each index of learning was statistically isolated. The three indices of learning were uncorrelated. Whereas all indices of learning had unique contributions to the recognition of natural-fast speech, only statistical learning had a unique contribution to the recognition of speech in noise and vocoded speech. These data suggest that although implicit learning may contribute to the recognition of challenging speech, the contribution may depend on the type of speech challenge and on the learning task.

Hearing Outcomes with Percutaneous and Transcutaneous BAHA® Technology in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes of BAHA Connect® and BAHA Attract® implantations, and to examine the prognostic utility of a preimplantation Softband®-attached processor trial. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent Connect® (19 ears) and Attract® (25 ears) implantation between 2007 and 2017. INTERVENTION: BAHA® implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unaided air conduction (AC), bone conduction (BC), and speech reception thresholds (SRTs), as well as free field (FF) aided with Softband®-attached processor and with implant-attached processor thresholds. RESULTS: Serviceable implant-attached processor PTA0.5,1,2 kHz (≤35 dB HL) was achieved in 89 and 88% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively, while at 4 kHz this was achieved in 68 and 32% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively (p  =  0.032). Significantly more Connect® ears showed alignment between FF aided with implant-attached processors thresholds and BC thresholds. The alignment between the Softband®-attached processors thresholds and implant-attached processors thresholds was similar in the two groups. Both groups exhibited similar positive improvement in the quality of life questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Accessibility to sound with the implant-attached processor is well predicted by the pre-implantation Softband® trial, both in the BAHA Connect® and in the BAHA Attract® ears. Hearing rehabilitation targets at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz are met by most Connect® and Attract® ears, while at 4 kHz the outcome with Attract® is poorer. This information should be presented to the patient during consultation prior to a decision as to the type of BAHA® device to be implanted.

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Presenting as Auditory Neuropathy Hearing Disorder in a Child.

Otologic manifestations are known to occur in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), but the occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss, especially in pediatric populations, has been addressed in only a few reports. Here, we describe a pediatric patient who presented with IIH and severe bilateral hearing loss. The patient's hearing loss was diagnosed as a form of auditory neuropathy (AN) and resolved after prompt treatment of the increased intracranial pressure. This case points to a possible association between IIH and AN and suggests that IIH may potentially be a reversible cause of AN spectrum disorder. Laryngoscope, 129:E407-E411, 2019.

Cochlear implantation outcome in straightforward cases: can we do more for adults who cannot understand speech using hearing aids alone?

BACKGROUND: Many adults with moderate-profound hearing loss whose speech recognition has deteriorated and are no longer benefitting from hearing aids (HAs) could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). Of these, only <5% are implanted. In order to inform eligible patients about expected results and ease the route to implantation, better guidelines for candidate selection are needed. OBJECTIVES: To provide reliable guidelines by determining, in a well-characterized group of implantees, the minimal expected post-CI scores for monosyllabic (MS) word recognition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 20 adults unilateral implantees considered (prior to implantation) straightforward CI candidates were assessed ≥20 months post-CI. Their post-CI CI-aided thresholds and MS word recognition were compared to their pre-CI scores. In addition, SSQ12 scores were evaluated post-CI. RESULTS: Post-CI, thresholds were 40 dB or better in all participants, and 35 dB or better in 95% of them. 90% scored 60% or better on MS words in quiet. In speech noise all scored 15-60% and 50% scored 45-60%. Poorer unaided pre-CI thresholds yielded greater patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with moderate-profound hearing loss, whose speech recognition has deteriorated, are no longer benefitting from HAs and fulfil defined criteria for straightforward CI, should be referred for formal CI candidacy evaluation.