Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 10(12): e33039, 2024 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988532

RESUMO

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ocular health related to digital device usage among university students in Lebanon. Design: A cross-sectional design was utilized to examine the association between the pandemic and ocular health. Participants: A total of 255 university students in Lebanon participated in the study, selected based on their enrollment during the pandemic. Methods: An online survey assessed participants' digital device usage, awareness of digital eye strain, and experienced symptoms. The study addressed the relationship between symptom frequency and screen time, especially in their connection to the pandemic and online learning. Results: Prior to the pandemic, the majority of participants (73.0 %) were unaware of digital eye strain. Following the transition to online learning, nearly half of the participants (47.0 %) reported using digital devices for 12 or more hours. The majority (92.0 %) experienced a substantial increase in daily digital device usage for learning, with an average increase of 3-5 h. Symptoms of digital eye strain, including headache, burning of eyes, blurry vision, sensitivity to light, worsening of vision and dryness of the eyes intensified in both frequency and severity during the pandemic and online learning period. Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of promoting healthy habits and implementing preventive measures to reduce the prevalence of digital eye strain symptoms among university students. Healthcare professionals and public health authorities should educate individuals on strategies to alleviate digital eye strain, considering the persistent reliance on digital devices beyond the pandemic.

2.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 2024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615818

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare 1-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal VEGF inhibitor injections were delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288 treatment-naive eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from October 31, 2015 to October 31, 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry. METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n = 1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n = 1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8-4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4-5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (P = 0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76 to -61) µm and -85 (-92 to -78) µm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (P = 0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (P < 0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

3.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 8(6): 527-536, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185453

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the proportion, predictors, and outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with a high burden of VEGF inhibitor intravitreal (IVT) injections after 2 years in routine clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project, of patients treated in European centers. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve eyes (1 eye per patient) starting VEGF inhibitors for nAMD from January 2017 to March 2020 with 24 months of follow-up. We analyzed the following 3 treatment-burden groups defined by the mean interval of the 3 closest injections to the 24-month visit: (1) those with a high-treatment burden had injection intervals ≤ 42 days, (2) those with a low-treatment burden had injection intervals between 43 and 83 days; and (3) those with tolerable treatment burden had injection intervals between 84 and 365 days. METHODS: Multinomial regression was used to evaluate baseline risk predictors of patients requiring a high-treatment burden. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients that experienced a high-treatment burden at 2 years and its predictors. RESULTS: We identified 2038 eligible patients completing 2 years of treatment (2038/3943 patients [60%]) with a median (quartile 1, quartile 3) of 13 (10, 17) injections. The proportion of patients with a high-treatment burden was 25% (516 patients) at 2 years. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.99; P < 0.01) were more likely to have high-treatment burden, whereas eyes with type 3 choroidal neovascular lesions at baseline were significantly less likely (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.52; P < 0.01). Regarding type of fluid, patients with subretinal fluid only at baseline (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.34-11.01; P = 0.01) and persistent active intraretinal (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.18-2.06; P < 0.01) or subretinal fluid only (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.52-3.21; P < 0.01) after the loading phase had a higher risk of high treatment burden at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: High treatment burden is a common issue in routine clinical practice in Europe, with a quarter of patients requiring injections of conventional VEGF inhibitors every 6 weeks at 2 years and 40% discontinuing treatment within 2 years. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Injeções Intravítreas , Sistema de Registros , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Acuidade Visual , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/administração & dosagem , Cegueira/etiologia , Cegueira/prevenção & controle , Cegueira/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 16: 2119-2127, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35800672

RESUMO

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy affecting different organ systems including the eye. The purpose of this review is to present and evaluate the medical literature regarding the early ophthalmological manifestations of acute myeloid leukemia. AML affects the ocular system through direct infiltration of tissues, secondary to hematological abnormalities, or in the form of chloroma or myeloid sarcoma in the brain or orbit consequently leading to a variety of manifestations depending on the ocular tissue involved. It is imperative for ophthalmologists to be aware of the early ophthalmological manifestations of AML which will allow for earlier diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening disease.

5.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 139(9): 937-943, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351374

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: A review of the injury patterns, treatment strategies, and responding physicians' experience during the Port of Beirut blast may help guide future ophthalmic disaster response plans. OBJECTIVE: To present the ophthalmic injuries and difficulties encountered as a result of the Port of Beirut blast on August 4, 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective medical record review of all patients who presented to the emergency department and 13 ophthalmology outpatient clinics at the American University of Beirut Medical Center for treatment of ophthalmic injuries sustained from the explosion in Port of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, from August 4 to the end of November 2020. Patients were identified from emergency records, outpatient records, and operative reports. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Types of ocular injuries, final best-corrected visual acuity, and need for surgical intervention were evaluated. Visual acuity was measured with correction based on noncycloplegic refraction using the Snellen medical record. EXPOSURES: Ocular or ocular adnexal injuries sustained from the Port of Beirut explosion. RESULTS: A total of 39 blast survivors with ocular injuries were included in this study. Twenty-two patients presented with ocular injuries on the day of the blast, and 17 patients presented within the following 3 months to the ophthalmology clinics for a total of 48 eyes of 39 patients were treated secondary to the blast. Thirty-five patients (89.6%) were adults, and 24 (61.5%) were female. A total of 21 patients (53.8%) required surgical intervention, more than half of which were urgently requested on the same day of presentation (14 [35.9%]). Most eye injuries were caused by debris and shrapnel from shattered glass leading to surface injury (26 [54.2%]), eyelid lacerations (20 [41.6%]), orbital fractures (14 [29.2%]), brow lacerations (10 [20.8%]), hyphema (9 [18.8%]), open globe injuries (10 [20.8%]), and other global injuries. Only 7 injured eyes (14.5%) had a final best-corrected visual acuity of less than 20/200, including all 4 open globe injuries with primary no light perception (8.3%) requiring enucleation or evisceration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the aftermath of the Port of Beirut explosion, a review of the ophthalmic injuries showed a predominance of shrapnel-based injuries, many of which had a delayed presentation owing to the strain placed on health care services. Reverting to basic approaches was necessary in the context of a malfunctioning electronic medical record system.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões , Traumatismos Oculares , Lacerações , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosões/epidemiologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/etiologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/cirurgia , Explosões , Traumatismos Oculares/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Traumatismos Oculares/cirurgia , Pálpebras , Feminino , Humanos , Lacerações/complicações , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(4)2021 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33811093

RESUMO

Retinal artery and vein occlusion are rare devastating complications of central nervous system (CNS) leukaemic infiltrates of the retina and its vasculature. Only a handful of reports exist wherein CNS relapse presents with retinal vascular occlusions. This is usually accompanied by optic nerve swelling and subretinal infiltrates. We present a case of bilateral retinal artery occlusion as a first manifestation of CNS relapse in a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia without optic disc oedema and retinal infiltrates.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana , Sistema Nervoso Central , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/etiologia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/etiologia
7.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 15(5): 556-563, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640816

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report a case of a woman diagnosed with choroidal melanoma during pregnancy, as well as review similar cases published in the literature. The prevalence, risk factors, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of choroidal melanoma in pregnancy are addressed. METHODS: An extensive search of the literature was conducted by accessing PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases in January 2018 to identify cases of choroidal or uveal melanoma diagnosed during pregnancy. PATIENT: A 37-year-old white woman pregnant with twins and diagnosed with choroidal melanoma. RESULTS: Choroidal melanoma in pregnancy has a prevalence ranging from 4.3% to 7.5% among women of childbearing age with the disease. Pregnancy has been linked to increased incidence of choroidal melanoma, but female hormones have not been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Other factors such as melanocyte-stimulation hormone and fetal-induced angiogenesis may be implicated. Choroidal melanoma in pregnancy has not resulted in a worse maternal or fetal outcome. CONCLUSION: Although rare, choroidal melanoma in pregnancy is a clinical challenge. Management of these patients should be tailored to maternal and fetal needs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Coroide , Melanoma , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez , Adulto , Neoplasias da Coroide/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...