Esthetic rehabilitation of mutilated maxillary anterior alveolar segment by combining orthodontic osseous distraction and implant-supported crowns: A clinical report.

Bony defects in the esthetic zone, especially in the maxillary anterior region, increase the complexity of surgical and prosthetic procedures. Moving teeth with preprosthetic osseous distraction techniques can be an alternative nonsurgical option to traditional regenerative or reparative surgical therapies to increase bone volume. Healthy peri-implant bone, periodontium, and adjacent teeth provide a favorable environment for implant restorations. The esthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary region after the removal of 2 ankylosed central incisors is presented. The lateral incisors were moved mesially to the central incisor positions, and implants placed in the lateral incisor positions after new healthy bone had been induced.

Fixed screw-retained interim restorations with immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: A case series with six different techniques.

Postextraction immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone is a common treatment modality. Immediate fixed interim restoration following immediate implant placement may provide excellent esthetic results to the patients and boost the clinicians' confidence. This paper demonstrates a series of six different techniques used to fabricate the customized screw-retained interim restorations following immediate implant placement with partial extraction therapy in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone. The techniques have utilized a putty index, polycarbonate shell crown, patients' existing crowns (prosthetic or natural), or laminate veneer, or fabricated in the laboratory based on the specific clinical situation. Advantages and limitations of each technique including alternative techniques or materials have been discussed. Excellent esthetic results were obtained with all six techniques using the screw-retained immediate interim restorations following partial extraction therapy and immediate implant placement.

The socket shield technique with proximal extensions for single-rooted teeth.

The conventional socket shield (SS) design extends from the mesiolabial to the distolabial line angle. C-shaped SS, L-shaped SS, and proximal SS designs have proximal extensions that help to maintain the hard and soft tissue in the interproximal areas. This is beneficial for implant sites adjacent to an existing implant or an edentulous space. The most common complication of the socket shield technique (SST) is internal shield exposure. Due to anatomical features such as a scalloped ridge shape and an oval socket shape of some teeth, the risk of complications such as internal shield exposure, inadvertent SS displacement, and fracture of the SS during implant insertion is greater in proximal shield areas. The present article describes guidelines for case selection for proximal shield extensions, along with SS preparation and the selection of implant and prosthetic components.

Management of unfavorable implant positions and angulations in edentulous maxillae with different complete-arch fixed prosthetic designs: A case series and clinical guidelines.

Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla can be difficult because of anatomic limitations and high esthetic demand. The choice between cement and screw retention depends on factors such as esthetics, occlusion, retrievability, and passivity. The choice is also often governed by the ability to manage technical or biologic complications. In the edentulous maxilla, because of the bone trajectory and resorption pattern, unfavorable implant angulations may be encountered. In such situations, a conventional screw-retained prosthesis is difficult to design. This article describes the restoration of edentulous maxillae for a series of patients with different complete-arch fixed prosthesis designs. The clinical guidelines, including indications, advantages, and limitations of each design, were discussed.

Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone - Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: It is irrefutable that the extraction of teeth inextricably results in definitive changes in the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Recently, Socket-Shield Technique (SST) has been used to keep the buccal two-third of the root intact in the socket. This buccal shield further preserves the periodontium-bundle bone complex and hence preserves the buccal hard and soft tissue. The purpose of the study was to do a statistical comparative analysis of two different types of flapless and graftless techniques using the esthetic (Pink Esthetic Index) and radiological parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of thirty nonrestorable tooth/root stumps (vital or nonvital) were selected and randomly allocated to two different groups: control group with immediate conventional implant placement (without SST) (Group C, n = 15) and test group with immediate implant placement using SST (Group S, n = 15). All of the sites received immediate chairside temporaries. All implants were restored either with screw- or cement-retained prostheses 4 months postoperative. Each control and test group was analyzed at two different durations: 15 days after placement of provisional and 15 days after placement of definitive prosthesis. Five parameters of Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were used for esthetic analysis, and digital periapical radiographs were used for radiographic analysis. RESULTS: Within the time frame of the study (15 days postplacement of definitive prosthesis), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between PES of the two techniques. Test group S (mean = 9.07) showed better scores than control group C (mean = 6.87). It was observed that buccal bone was maintained in all the cases of test group S while there was loss of buccal bone in almost all the cases of control group C. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this short-term pilot study, better soft-tissue parameters were observed with SST as compared to a conventional graftless technique whenever a restoration on immediate implant placement is considered.

"ABCD" Implant Classification: A Comprehensive Philosophy for Treatment Planning in Completely Edentulous Arches.

A thorough and precise treatment plan that considers various factors such as age, availability of bone, interarch space for prosthesis design, smile line, lip support, patient desires, and economics is a necessity before implant surgery. Many previous classification systems for treatment planning in edentulous situations tend to focus on only a certain parameter such as esthetics, or available bone volume, or are specifically designed for the maxilla or mandible. The authors have proposed a simplified and universal ABCD classification that uses the 4 vital parameters of age, bone volume, cosmetic display, and degree of resorption to create an algorithm that satisfies the treatment needs of every patient. Various permutations of the 4 parameters can be used to arrive at a solution that streamlines the further phases of the rehabilitative process. The aim of the present article is to provide a science-driven approach to understand a patient's individual needs with careful attention to the interplay of all the aforementioned factors in the decision-making process.

Shield the socket: Procedure, case report and classification.

The extraction of a tooth leads to a cascade of events which results in resorption of the alveolar bone around the socket. The buccal bone loss that occurs postextraction leads to vertical and horizontal bone loss. It requires complex hard and soft-tissue reconstruction to achieve esthetically pleasing results in such cases. In the socket-shield technique (SST) the root is bisected, and the buccal two-third of the root is preserved in the socket so that the periodontium along with the bundle bone and the buccal bone remains intact. A classification of SST technique is proposed depending on the position of the shield in the socket. This classification is required so as to help in understanding the preparation design and the role of shield and in maximizing the usage of the shield to achieve best possible esthetics in immediate implant placement sites.

Fast-Tracking the Implant Prosthodontic Workflow for Full-Arch Restorations: Case Series.

The conventional approach for fabrication of a definitive prosthesis for full-arch implant cases requires multiple visits. This article presents a case series highlighting the efficacy of a novel time-saving technique for full-arch implant prosthodontics. The technique is indicated for cases in which an immediate fixed provisional restoration has been delivered on the day of implant placement or within 72 hours of implant placement or for cases where the clinician has made an esthetically and functionally acceptable provisional restoration before starting the prosthetic phase for the definitive restoration. The technique involves taking an impression of the well-adjusted provisional restoration and transferring the jaw relation in a single step, allowing the clinician to circumvent several steps without compromising accuracy or end results.

Management of Fenestration Defects During Flapless Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.

The success of flapless immediate implant placement is dependent on the bony architecture on the buccal aspect of the socket. The presence of a fenestration defect in the buccal cortical plate may jeopardize the esthetic outcome, especially if the clinician does not undertake adequate soft and hard tissue augmentation procedures. This article describes the use of an esthetic buccal flap design to deal with fenestration defects created during anterior implant placement immediately after extraction. This technique has been proven effective in maintaining the soft tissue architecture and allows hard tissue grafting of the fenestration defect around the implant in a postextraction socket.

Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the new bone formation following guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a calcium phosphosilicate (CPS), alloplastic bone putty at peri-implant dehiscence defects and to assess survival rate of implants placed in the augmented sites after 12 months of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were placed in patients exhibiting Seibert class I ridge defects resulting in peri-implant dehiscence defects. The defects were treated following GBR principles with the use of a CPS alloplastic bone graft putty in combination either with a collagen membrane or a titanium mesh. The height of each bony dehiscence was clinically measured at the time of implant placement and again during second-stage surgery. The percentage of complete defect coverage, frequency of adverse events, and risk factors for residual defect were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-six implants were placed in 26 patients. Twenty-seven of the 36 sites employed a collagen membrane in conjunction with the CPS while the remaining nine sites utilized a titanium membrane. Mean gain in bone height was 3.23 ± 2.04 mm, with 75 % of the peri-implant defects achieving complete regeneration. A negative correlation was identified between patient age and complete coverage of the peri-implant defect (p = 0.026). The implant survival rate at 12 months was 97.22 %. CONCLUSION: Use of CPS bone putty during delayed implant placement at peri-implant dehiscence sites either in combination with a collagen membrane or a titanium mesh results in predictable defect coverage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The handling characteristics of CPS putty may simplify GBR protocol. Implants placed in conjunction with GBR have a very good survival rate after 1 year of follow-up.

A clinical and radiographic case series of implants placed with the simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique in the posterior maxilla.

The aim of the present case series was to evaluate a simplified minimally invasive transalveolar sinus elevation technique utilizing calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty for hydraulic sinus membrane elevation. The simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique is based on the application of hydraulic pressure via a viscous bone graft that acts as an incompressible fluid. In this retrospective study, 21 patients (mean age: 48.5 ± 12 years) consecutively treated with the simplified minimally invasive transalveolar sinus elevation technique were evaluated. 28 tapered implants were placed in posterior maxillary sites with less than 6 mm of residual bone height as determined radiographically on cone beam volumetric tomographs. No sinus membrane perforations were noted and none of the patients complained of symptoms of sinusitis post-operatively (0%). The mean gain in bone height post-operatively was 10.31 ± 2.46 mm (p < 0.001). All implants successfully integrated (100% success rate) and were loaded with cement-retained prostheses. The proposed technique is a simple, efficacious, minimally invasive approach for sinus elevation that can be recommended for sites with at least 3 mm of residual height.

Implants placed simultaneously with lateral window sinus augmentation using a putty alloplastic bone substitute for increased primary implant stability: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the primary stability of implants placed in significantly pneumatized maxillary sinuses with minimum residual bone height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients who had been treated with simultaneous implant placement in sites with <5 mm of vertical bone height using a modified direct sinus lift technique were included. Implants placed in adjacent sites with at least 5 mm of bone height were included as quasi-controls. RESULTS: A total of 30 implants were inserted with a maximum insertion torque number >20 N/cm. Logistic regression analysis failed to show any association between residual bone height and primary implant stability. Implant survival was 96.67% (29/30) during a mean follow-up of 15.74 months postloading. CONCLUSIONS: The diminished preoperative vertical dimensions of the residual ridges did not seem to negatively influence the osseointegration of implants placed in this study. The prerequisite for simultaneous sinus augmentation and implant placement is an adequate primary stability of the implant and not a fixed minimum bone height level.