RESUMO
Introduction: Toleration of the complexity and pain of interventions such as endoscopy and colonoscopy is highly difficult for patients. Considering the disagreement on the method of injection of propofol, this study was performed to evaluate the quality of anesthesia using the three methods of propofol + fentanyl, propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine, and propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine. Methods: This one-way blind clinical trial study included 99 patients who were admitted in three groups by block randomization method. In a group of patients that were sedated with propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine, the dose of all drugs is reduced by half the amount of the other groups. Variables included age, sex, frequency of cough, apnea, need for jaw thrust maneuver, O2 saturation, duration of recovery, and procedural satisfaction. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. P value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: The three groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics. The effects of the three sedation protocols on the variables showed that patient's apnea, cough, O2 saturation, and also proceduralist satisfaction in the group of the patient that sedated with four drugs was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than other groups. But there was no significant difference between the three groups when comparing the recovery time and need for jaw thrust during the procedure. Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that the use of combination of "propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine" with lower doses, significantly results in higher quality sedation compared with higher doses of "propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine" or "propofol + fentanyl" for scoping procedures.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block) is widely used as an anesthetic technique for operations of short duration of the distal upper or lower extremities. We compared the efficacy of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine plus paracetamol versus lidocaine plus systemic morphine for short-duration hand and forearm surgeries. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms: lidocaine plus morphine (control) and lidocaine plus paracetamol were carried out at a University hospital. METHODS: We included men and women aged 20 to 70 years scheduled for short surgical procedures (30-60 minutes) distal to the elbow. Intravenous regional anesthesia was carried out by injecting 45 cc lidocaine 0.5% plus 300 mg paracetamol for the paracetamol group; or 45 cc lidocaine 0.5% plus 4 mg intravenous morphine for the control group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain-free period in minutes since deflation of proximal tourniquet. The secondary outcome was the highest intensity of postoperative pain on the visual analog scale within 2 hours after deflating the proximal tourniquet. FINDINGS: There was no significant difference between morphine and paracetamol in the duration of postoperative pain-free period (P = .078) and the mean intensity for maximum pain (P = .106). However, severe pain was significantly more frequent in the morphine group (P = .001). Paracetamol seemed to be safer than morphine as an adjuvant to lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using 2 cc paracetamol (300 mg Apotel) as the adjuvant to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia.
