RESUMO
This case report elucidates an uncommon manifestation of toxoplasmosis characterized by an ulcerative oropharyngeal lesion and cervical lymphadenopathy, which intriguingly simulated a tonsillar neoplasm. The patient, a 28-year-old immunocompetent woman, reported symptoms such as a persistent sore throat, unilateral neck pain, and otalgia. Despite the initial clinical impressions, a diagnostic left subtotal tonsillectomy revealed no malignancy but marked acute and chronic inflammation. A comprehensive investigation subsequently indicated a recent primary infection with Toxoplasma gondii, as evidenced by the presence of high IgM antibodies and low IgG avidity. This unique case underlines the significance of incorporating toxoplasmosis into the differential diagnosis of oropharyngeal lesions, thereby necessitating a meticulous approach to laboratory testing. Laryngoscope, 134:1741-1743, 2024.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Tonsilares , Toxoplasmose , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Neoplasias Tonsilares/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários , Afinidade de Anticorpos , Imunoglobulina G , Toxoplasmose/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes of BAHA Connect® and BAHA Attract® implantations, and to examine the prognostic utility of a preimplantation Softband®-attached processor trial. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent Connect® (19 ears) and Attract® (25 ears) implantation between 2007 and 2017. INTERVENTION: BAHA® implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unaided air conduction (AC), bone conduction (BC), and speech reception thresholds (SRTs), as well as free field (FF) aided with Softband®-attached processor and with implant-attached processor thresholds. RESULTS: Serviceable implant-attached processor PTA0.5,1,2 kHz (≤35âdB HL) was achieved in 89 and 88% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively, while at 4âkHz this was achieved in 68 and 32% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively (pâ =â 0.032). Significantly more Connect® ears showed alignment between FF aided with implant-attached processors thresholds and BC thresholds. The alignment between the Softband®-attached processors thresholds and implant-attached processors thresholds was similar in the two groups. Both groups exhibited similar positive improvement in the quality of life questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Accessibility to sound with the implant-attached processor is well predicted by the pre-implantation Softband® trial, both in the BAHA Connect® and in the BAHA Attract® ears. Hearing rehabilitation targets at 0.5, 1, and 2âkHz are met by most Connect® and Attract® ears, while at 4âkHz the outcome with Attract® is poorer. This information should be presented to the patient during consultation prior to a decision as to the type of BAHA® device to be implanted.