GALAD score and a proposal for GALADUS model for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in Vietnamese patients with chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: The GALAD score, a serum biomarker-based model, predicts the likelihood of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease. We evaluated the performance of the GALAD score compared to that of liver ultrasound in detecting HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study recruited a group of 136 patients with HCC and a control group of 436 patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C. The performance of the GALAD score and ultrasound in detecting HCC in these patients was analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal GALAD score were compared to those of ultrasound. RESULTS: The AUC of the GALAD score for detecting HCC was 0.940 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.96], higher than that of ultrasound [0.939 (0.91-0.96), p < 0.001]. At a threshold of 1.24, the GALAD score had a sensitivity of 91.2% and a specificity of 81.9% for detecting HCC. The AUC of the GALAD score for early HCC detection was 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.80, p < 0.001; threshold 1.13, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 67.8%, p < 0.001). The combination of GALAD and ultrasound (GALADUS score) showed further improvement, achieving an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99; cut-off point 1.37, sensitivity 95.6%, specificity 89.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the GALADUS score showed improved performance compared to the GALAD score. Therefore, we suggest that the performance of the GALAD score should be reconsidered and that it should be evaluated in combination with ultrasound for HCC detection.

Predicting the presence of extracranial metastases in patients with brain metastases upon first diagnosis of cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine factors allowing the prediction of extracranial metastases in patients presenting with brain metastases at the first diagnosis of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 659 patients with brain metastases upon first diagnosis of cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The parameters age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), primary tumor type and number of brain metastases were compared between 359 patients with extracranial metastases and 300 patients without extracranial metastases. Additional analyses were performed for patients with the most unfavorable and those with the most favorable characteristics. RESULTS: The comparison of patients with versus without extracranial metastases revealed significant differences between the groups in terms of KPS (p < 0.001) and number of brain metastases (p < 0.001). Of the study patients, 113 had both most unfavorable characteristics, i.e. KPS ≤ 50 and ≥ 4 brain metastases. The sensitivity for identifying patients with extracranial metastases was 82 %; specificity was 51 %. A total of 50 patients had KPS ≥ 90 and only one brain metastasis. The sensitivity for identifying patients without extracranial metastases was 86 %; specificity was 58 %. CONCLUSION: The combination of KPS and the number of brain metastases can help to predict the presence or absence of extracranial metastases.

Brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): prognostic importance of the number of involved extracranial organs.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigated the potential prognostic value of the number of involved extracranial organs in patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 472 patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone with 5 × 4 Gy or 10 × 3 Gy for brain metastasis from NSCLC were included in this retrospective study. In addition to the number of involved extracranial organs, 6 further potential prognostic factors were investigated including WBRT regimen, age, gender, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), number of brain metastases, and the interval from cancer diagnosis to WBRT. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with metastatic involvement of one (lung vs. bone vs. other metastasis) and two (lung + bone vs. lung+lymph nodes vs. other combinations) extracranial organs. RESULTS: The survival rates at 6 months of the patients with involvement of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 extracranial organs were 52, 27, 17, 4, and 14%, respectively (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved extracranial organs remained significant (risk ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.46; p<0.001). Age <65 years (p=0.004), KPS ≥ 70 (p<0.001), and only 1-3 brain metastases (p=0.022) were also significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. In the separate analyses of patients with involvement of one and two extracranial organs, survival was not significantly different based on the pattern of extracranial organ involvement. CONCLUSION: The number of involved extracranial organs is an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC, irrespective of the pattern of extracranial organ involvement.

Brain metastasis. Prognostic value of the number of involved extracranial organs.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic role for survival of the number and the type of involved extracranial organs in patients with brain metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 1146 patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastasis have been retrospectively analyzed. In addition to the number of involved extra cranial organs, seven potential prognostic factors were investigated including WBRT regimen, age, gender, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), primary tumor type, number of brain metastases, and the interval from cancer diagnosis to WBRT. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed for patients with involvement of one (lung vs. bone vs. liver vs. other metastasis) and two (lung + lymph nodes vs. lung + bone vs. lung + liver vs. liver + bone vs. other combinations) extracranial organs. RESULTS: The 6-month survival rates for the involvement of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 extracranial organs were 51, 30, 16, 13, and 10%, respectively (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved extracranial organs maintained significance (risk ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.34; p<0.001). According to the multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001), gender (p=0.002), and KPS (p<0.001) were also independent prognostic factors for survival. In the subgroup analyses of patients with involvement of one and two extracranial organs, survival was not significantly different based on the extracranial organ involved. CONCLUSION: The number of involved extracranial organs proved to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with brain metastasis, regardless of the organs involved. The number of involved extracranial organs should be considered in future trials designed for patients with brain metastasis.

A new survival score for patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common primary tumor in patients developing brain metastasis. This study was performed to develop and validate a survival score particularly for this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, the data of 514 patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastasis from NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a test group (n = 257) and a validation group (n = 257). In the multivariate analysis of the test group, gender, performance status, and extracranial metastases were independent predictors of survival and, therefore, included in the scoring system. The score for each of the three factors was obtained from the 6-month survival rate (in %) divided by 10. The total scores that represented the sum of the three scores were 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, or 15 points. Three prognostic groups were formed according to the total scores. RESULTS: The 6-month survival rates in the test group were 9 % for 5-9 points (group A), 54 % for 11-12 points (group B), and 79 % for 15 points (group C). In the validation group the 6-month survival rates were 14, 56, and 78 %, respectively. The comparisons between the prognostic groups A, B, and C of the test and the validation group did not reveal any significant differences. CONCLUSION: This new score appears valid and reproducible. It can help predict the survival of patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC.

A simple survival score for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Personalized cancer treatment considers the patient's survival prognosis. Therefore, it is important to be able to estimate the patient's survival time, particularly in a palliative situation such as brain metastasis. This study aimed to create and validate a survival score for patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer, which is the second most common primary tumor in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 230 patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastasis from breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned to a test (n = 115) or a validation group (n = 115). According to the results of the multivariate analysis of the test group, Karnofsky Performance Score and extracranial metastases were included in the scoring system. The score for each factor was obtained from the 6-month survival rate (in %) divided by 10. Total scores represented the sum of these scores and were 4, 7, 9, or 12 points. Three prognostic groups were formed. RESULTS: The 6-month survival rates in the test group were 10 % for 4-7 points, 55 % for 9 points, and 78 % for 15 points (p < 0.001). In the validation group the corresponding 6-month survival rates were 11, 54, and 75 %, respectively (p < 0.001). The comparisons between the prognostic groups of the test and the validation group did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: This simple survival score appears valid and reproducible. It can be used to estimate the survival time of patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer receiving WBRT alone.